Designing computer-generated pedagogical feedback for Spanish students of EFL

  1. Senra Silva, Inmaculada
Journal:
Revista española de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 0213-2028

Year of publication: 2010

Volume: 23

Pages: 281-296

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista española de lingüística aplicada

Bibliographic References

  • Bolt, P. 1992. “An evaluation of grammar-checking programs as self-help learning aids for learners of English as a foreign language.” CALL 5 (1-2): 49-91.
  • Chacón-Beltrán, R. 2007. “Learner Autonomy in CALL: A Grammar-Checker for Spanish EFL Students”. English Language and Literature Studies: Interfaces and Integrations. Eds. K. Rasulic and I. Trbojevic. Belgrade: University of Belgrade. 267-273.
  • Chacón-Beltrán, R. 2009. “Life-Long Learning and Learner Autonomy in English as a Foreign Language Instruction: Technological solutions in the European Space for Higher Education”. English Language Teaching in the European Credit Transfer System: Facing the Challenge. Ed. M. L. Pérez-Cañado. Bern: Peter Lang. 187-195.
  • Conrad, S. and L. Goldstein. 1999. “ESL student revision after teacher written comments: Texts, contexts and individuals”. Journal of Second Language Learning 8: 147-180.
  • Ferris, D. 1999. “The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996)”. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 1-10.
  • Ferris, D. 2006. “Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the shortand long-term effects of written error correction”. Feedback in Second Language Writing. Contents and Issues. Eds. K. Hyland and F. Hyland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 81-122.
  • Ferris, D. and R. Barrie. 2001. “Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be?”. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161-184.
  • Goldstein, L. 2006. “Feedback and revision in second language writing”. Feedback in second language writing. (Cambridge Applied Linguistics). Eds. K. Hyland and F. Hyland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 185-205.
  • Goldstein, L. and R. Kohls. 2002. “Writing, commenting and revising: The relationship between teacher feedback and student revision online. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference. Salt Lake City, UT. April 6-9.
  • Hamp-Lyons, L. 2006. “Feedback in portfolio-based writing courses”. Feedback in second language writing. (Cambridge Applied Linguistics). Eds. K. Hyland and F. Hyland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 140-161.
  • Higgs, T. and R. Clifford. 1982. “The push toward communication”. Curriculum, Competence, and the Foreign Language Teacher. Ed. T. Higgs. Skokie, IL: National Textbook Company. 57-79.
  • Hyland, F. 2001. “Providing effective support: investigating feedback to distance language learners”. Open Learning 16 (3): 233-245.
  • Hyland, F. 2003. “Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback”. System 31: 217-230
  • Hyland, K. and F. Hyland. 2006. “Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction”. Feedback in second language writing. (Cambridge Applied Linguistics). Eds. K. Hyland and F. Hyland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1-19.
  • Lalande, J. F. 1982. “Reducing composition errors: An experiment”. The Modern Language Journal 66: 140-149.
  • Lawley, J. 1999. “A new computer-mediated writing aid for Spanish students of English as a foreign language”. English Language Teacher Education in Europe. Eds. P. Faber et al. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 31-43.
  • Lawley, J. 2003. “The development of a grammar checker for Spanish secondary students of English as a foreign language”. RESLA 16: 127-138.
  • Lawley, J. 2004. “A preliminary report on a new grammar checker to help students of English as a foreign language”. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 3 (3): 331-342.
  • Lawley, J. 2009. “An EFL Grammar Checker that really works: making Bologna come true”. English Language Teaching in the European Credit Transfer System: Facing the Challenge. Ed. M. L. Pérez-Cañado. Bern: Peter Lang. 197-204.
  • Milton, J. 2006. “Resource-rich Web-based feedback”. Feedback in second language writing. (Cambridge Applied Linguistics). Eds. K. Hyland and F. Hyland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 123-139.
  • Nagata, N. 1993. “Intelligent computer feedback for Second Language instruction”. The Modern Language Journal 77 (3): 331-339.
  • Nagata, N. 1996. “Computer vs. workbook instruction in Second Language Acquisition”. CALICO Journal 14 (1): 53-75.
  • Truscott, J. 1992. “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”. Language Learning 46: 327-369.
  • Truscott, J. 1996. “The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Ferris”. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 111-122.
  • Ware, P. D. and M. Warscgauer. 2006. “Electronic feedback and second language writing”. Feedback in second language writing. (Cambridge Applied Linguistics). Eds. K. Hyland and F. Hyland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 105-122.
  • Ypsilandis, G. S. 2002. “Feedback in Distance Education”. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15 (2): 167-181.