Más que ideologíala injusticia percibida diferencia a los simpatizantes de un nuevo partido antiausteridad de los simpatizantes de los partidos tradicionales de izquierda

  1. Alexandra Vázquez
  2. David Lois
Journal:
International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

ISSN: 0213-4748,  1579-3680

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 34

Issue: 1

Pages: 26-57

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2018.1537651 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Tras el estallido de la crisis económica en 2008, los partidos antiausteridad del sur de Europa han cobrado mayor relevancia y han transformado radicalmente la escena política. En España, la emergencia de Podemos, un partido de izquierda opuesto a las medidas de austeridad, ha hecho peligrar el sistema bipartidista tradicional. No obstante, se sabe muy poco sobe las razones que motivaron a más de un millón de españoles a votar a un partido recién creado en sus primeras elecciones. Para subsanar ese vacío, el presente estudio analiza los factores que motivan la intención de votar a Podemos en lugar de otros partidos tradicionales de izquierda. Los resultados revelan que, además de los predictores tradicionales del comportamiento de voto (orientación ideológica e identificación con el partido), la injusticia percibida — una variable clave en la teoría de la acción colectiva — influye de manera decisiva en la preferencia por Podemos sobre otros partidos tradicionales de izquierda. El análisis cualitativo de las razones indicadas por los participantes mediante una pregunta abierta arroja resultados similares. Estos resultados sugieren que el apoyo a un partido contrario a las medidas de austeridad podría considerarse una acción colectiva dirigida a promover el cambio social.

Bibliographic References

  • (2015). Barómetro De Abril, Retrieved from www.scopus.com
  • Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2006). Exploring the bases of partisanship in the american electorate: Social identity vs. ideology. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 175-187. doi:10.1177/106591290605900201
  • Arzheimer, K. (2009). Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in western europe, 1980-2002. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 259-275. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00369.x
  • Blumenstiel, J. E., & Plischke, T. (2015). Changing motivations, time of the voting decision, and short-term volatility - the dynamics of voter heterogeneity. Electoral Studies, 37, 28-40. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.003
  • Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Capanna, C., & Mebane, M. (2009). Perceived political self-efficacy: Theory, assessment, and applications. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1002-1020. doi:10.1002/ejsp.604
  • Cohen, A., Vigoda, E., & Samorly, A. (2001). Analysis of the mediating effect of personal-psychological variables on the relationship between socioeconomic status and political participation: A structural equations framework. Political Psychology, 22(4), 727-757. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00260
  • Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States, Retrieved from www.scopus.com
  • Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 108-119. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.108
  • Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 Retrieved from www.scopus.com
  • Karyotis, G., & Rüdig, W. (2015). Blame and punishment? the electoral politics of extreme austerity in greece. Political Studies, 63(1), 2-24. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12076
  • Karyotis, G., Rüdig, W., & Judge, D. (2014). Representation and austerity politics: Attitudes of greek voters and elites compared. South European Society and Politics, 19(4), 435-456. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.977478
  • Kerbo, H. R. (1982). Movements of “Crisis” and movements of “Affluence”: A critique of deprivation and resource mobilization theories. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 26(4), 645-663. doi:10.1177/0022002782026004004
  • Kuenzi, M., & Lambright, G. M. S. (2011). Who votes in africa? an examination of electoral participation in 10 african countries. Party Politics, 17(6), 767-799. doi:10.1177/1354068810376779
  • Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1232-1245. doi:10.1177/0146167206289729
  • Louis, W. R. (2009). Collective action - and then what? Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 727-748. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01623.x
  • Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Through rose-colored glasses: System-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 991-1004. doi:10.1177/0146167213487997
  • Petty, R. E., Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2003). Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. Handbook of Affective Sciences, , 752-772. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
  • Pilch, I., & Baran, L. (2013). Personal values, perceptions of unfairness in social exchange and happiness among young voters and non-voters in poland. Political Preferences, 4, 99-114. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
  • Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597-617. doi:10.1111/bjso.12006
  • Roberts, K. (2015). Youth mobilisations and political generations: Young activists in political change movements during and since the twentieth century. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(8), 950-966. doi:10.1080/13676261.2015.1020937
  • Sabucedo, J. M., & Cramer, D. (1991). Sociological and psychological predictors of voting in great britain. Journal of Social Psychology, 131(5), 647-654. doi:10.1080/00224545.1991.9924648
  • Sanders, D. (2003). Party identification, economic perceptions, and voting in british general elections, 1974-97. Electoral Studies, 22(2), 239-263. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00014-8
  • Smith, H. J., & Ortiz, D. J. (2002). Is it just me? the different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration, , 91-115. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
  • Sturmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 59-99. doi:10.1080/10463280340000117
  • Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129-148. doi:10.1037/a0022728
  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 307-326. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00452.x
  • Van Der Brug, W., & Mughan, A. (2007). Charisma, leader effects and support for right-wing populist parties. Party Politics, 13(1), 29-51. doi:10.1177/1354068806071260
  • van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 127-138. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.003
  • van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology, 61(5-6), 886-905. doi:10.1177/0011392113479314
  • Van Zomeren, M. (2016). Building a tower of babel? integrating core motivations and features of social structure into the political psychology of political action. Political Psychology, 37, 87-114. doi:10.1111/pops.12322
  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
  • Wright, S. C. (2009). The next generation of collective action research. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 859-879. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01628.x
Data source: Dialnet