Efectos de orden de presentación entre criterios de respuestas basados en relaciones de semejanza y de equivalencia-equivalencia

  1. García García, Andrés
  2. Gómez Bujedo, Jesús
  3. Pérez Fernández, Vicente J.
  4. Bohórquez Zayas, Cristóbal
  5. Gutiérrez Domínguez, María Teresa
Journal:
Acción psicológica

ISSN: 1578-908X

Year of publication: 2003

Volume: 2

Issue: 3

Pages: 239-249

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5944/AP.2.3.534 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Acción psicológica

Abstract

This paper describes an experiment which shows how the arbitrary relationship of equivalence-equivalence can be blocked, and in turn to block, to a non arbitrary relationship as it is the physical similarity among stimuli, in function of the order of presentation of the answer criteria. It was carried out with University students. This equivalence-equivalence paradigm was proposed in this study as a model of human analogical reasoning in which the subjects respond (or not) according to the equivalence relationship between two complex stimuli. The results of this work are discussed from a double perspective: on the one hand, the study of those factors that can distort the achievement of complex behaviours based on the relationships among the antecedent stimuli; On the other hand, the extent of the basic competition phenomena already consolidated in the phenomena of classic and operant conditioning.

Bibliographic References

  • Barnes, D. (1990). Equivalence without symmetry? A stimulus artefact. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Northeastern University, Boston.
  • Barnes, D., Hegarty, N. y Smeets, P. M. (1997). Rela- ting equivalence relations to equivalence relations: a relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57-83.
  • Benjumea, S. (1993). Condicionamiento Instrumental Humano. En J. I. Navarro (Ed.): Aprendizaje y Memoria Humana, pp. 441-479. Aravaca, Madrid: Ed. McGraw-Hill.
  • Bohórquez, C., García, A., Gutiérrez, M. T., Gómez, J. y Pérez, V. (2002). Efecto del entrenamiento en reflexividad y la evaluación de equivalencia en la competencia entre relaciones arbitrarias y no arbitrarias en el paradigma de equivalencia-equivalencia. Revista Internacional de Psicología y Terapia Psicológica, 2, 41-56.
  • Bohórquez, C., García, A., Pérez, V., Gómez, J. y Gutiérrez, M. T. (2001). Ensombrecimiento entre relaciones arbitrarias y no arbitrarias en el paradigma de equivalencia-equivalencia. Suma Psicológica. Vol 8, n.° 2, 251-270.
  • Bush, K. M., Sidman, M. y de Rose, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29-45.
  • Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M. y Barnes-Holmes, D. (2000). Matching compound samples with unitary comparisons: Derived stimulus relations in adults and children. The Psychological Record, 50, 671-685.
  • Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M. y Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002). Establishing Transfer of Compound Control in Children: A Stimulus Control Analysis. The Psychological Record, 52, n.° 2.
  • Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M. y Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002). Matching Functionally Same Relations: Implications for Equivalence-Equivalence as a Model for Analogical Reasoning. The Psychological Record, 52, n.° 3.
  • Catania, A. C., Shimoff, E. y Matthews, A. A. (1990). The experimental analysis of rule-governed behavior. En S.C. Hayes, (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies and instructional control. Nueva York: Plenum Press.
  • Denavy, J. M., Hayes, S. C. y Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
  • García, A. (2002). Antecedentes históricos del uso de discriminaciones condicionales en el estudio de la simetría. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 23, 123-130.
  • García, A. y Benjumea, S. (2001). Pre-requisitos ontogenéticos para la emergencia de relaciones simétricas. Revista Internacional de Psicología y Terapia Psicológica. 1, n.° 1, 115-135.
  • García, A., y Benjumea, S. (2002). Relaciones bidireccionales en no-humanos. Suma Psicológica, 9, n.° 2, 193-214.
  • García, A., y Benjumea, S. (2002). Orígenes y ampliación y aplicaciones de la equivalencia de estímulos. Apuntes de Psicología, 2, n.° 1, 41-56.
  • García, A., Gómez, J., Gutiérrez, M. T., y Puche, A. (2001). Formación y ampliación de clases de equivalencia aplicadas al tratamiento de un niño autista. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 27, n.° 114, 649-669.
  • García, A., Gutiérrez, M. T., Bohórquez, C., Gómez, J., Pérez, V. (2002). Competencia entre relaciones arbitrarias y relaciones no arbitrarias en el paradigma de equivalencia-equivalencia. Apuntes de Psicología, 20, 205-224.
  • Gershenson, C. W. y Joseph, B. (1990). The formation of conditional discrimination and equivalence classes by individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. Poster presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Nashville, TN.
  • Green, G. y Sigurdartottir, Z. G. (1990). Long-term remembering of equivalence classes and sequence classes by two brain-injured adults. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Nashville, TN.
  • Hayes, S. C. Y Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behevior – behavior relations, and the behavior – analitic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst. 9, 175-190.
  • Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. En L. J. Hayes y P. N. Chase (Eds.). Dialogues of verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
  • Hayes, S. C. y Hayes, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. En Hayes, S.C. (Ed.): Rule-Governed Behavior: Cognition, Contingencies and Instructional Control. Pp. 153-188. Nueva York: Plenum Press.
  • Joseph, B. y Thompson, T. (1990). The formation of equivalence relations by persons with Prader-Willi and Down Syndrome. Poster presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Nashville, TN.
  • Kamin, L.J. (1968). «Attention-like» processes in classical conditioning. En M.R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive stimulation. Miami: University or Miami Press.
  • Kamin, L.J. (1969). Predictibility, susprise, attention, and conditioning. En B.A. Campbell y R.M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior. Nueva York: Appleton-Century-Crofs.
  • Lazar, R. (1977). Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 27, 381-392.
  • Mackay, H.A. (1991). Conditional stimulus control. En Iversen y Lattal (Eds.) Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Eslevier Science Publisher BV.
  • Markham, M.R. y Dougher, M.J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
  • Pavlov, I.P. (1927). Conditional reflexes. Londres: Oxford University Press.
  • Pérez-González, L. A. (1994). Transfer of relational stimulus control in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 487-503.
  • Pérez-González, L. A. y Moreno-Sierra, V. (1999). Formación de clases de equivalencia en ancianos. Psicothema, 11, 2, 325-336.
  • Puche, A., García, A., Gómez, J. y Gutiérrez, M. T. (2002) Emergencia de relaciones expresivas y receptivas en el entrenamiento de letras y números en niños diagnosticados con autismo. Acción Psicológica, 3, 245-252.
  • Rehfeldt, R. A., Clayton, M. y Hayes, L. J. (1998). Blocking the formation of 5-member equivalence classes using complex samples. Mexican Journal of behavior analysis, 24, 279-292.
  • Rehfeldt, R. A., Dickson, M. R., Hayes, L. J. y Steele, A. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and the blocking effect. The Psychological Record. 48, 647-664.
  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
  • Sidman, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: where do they come from? En D. E. Blackman y H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice. Contributions and controversies. Hove: Erlbaum.
  • Sidman, M. y Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample. An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
  • Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
  • Singh, N. N. y Solman, R. T. (1990). A stimulus control analysis of the picture-word problem in children who are mentally retarded; The blocking effect. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 525-532.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1937). Two types of conditioned reflex: A reply to Konorski and Miller. Journal of General Psychology, 16, 272-279.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1957). Conducta verbal. México. Trillas. Skinner, B.F. (1969). Contingencias de reforzamiento. México. Trillas.
  • Skinner, B.F. (1984a). An operant analysis of problem solving. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 473-724.
  • Stromer, R. y Stromer, J.B (1990a). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51- 66.
  • Stromer, R. y Stromer, J.B. (1990b). Matching to complex: Further study of arbritary stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 40, 505-516.
  • Valero, L. y Luciano, M. C. (1993). Relaciones de equivalencia: un estudio de replicación del efecto de la relación simétrica sobre la transitiva. Apuntes de psicología, 37, 25-40.
  • Wulfert, E. y Hayes, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125-144.