Constructing fuzzy composite indicators to support water policy entrepreneurship

  1. Pérez Zabaleta, Amelia
  2. Fernández, Pascual
  3. Prados-Castillo, Juan F.
  4. de Castro-Pardo, Mónica
Revista:
Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship

ISSN: 2773-0328

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 1

Número: 3

Páginas: 100022

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.STAE.2022.100022 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Composite indicators play a very useful role in supporting international policy entrepreneurship, helping to inform decision-making processes and to address conflicts between countries. In this paper we present a Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (Fuzzy-DEA) model to construct composite indicators based on time series under the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) approach in order to evaluate water security in 10 European water security hotspots. First, we identified nine indicators within the PSR framework. Second, we aggregated the indicators in each PSR set using a Fuzzy-DEA model. Finally, we compared the PSR results under pessimistic, optimistic and neutral scenarios. Results show that, overall, Bulgaria achieved the best pressure, state and response performance. In terms of responses, Spain registered the best performance after Bulgaria, despite the fact that it suffers from the highest pressures of all the analyzed countries. Estonia achieved the best state performance in all three scenarios, but worse results in responses than Bulgaria and Spain. Cyprus and Belgium registered the highest variability for pressures, Spain for state and Portugal for responses. The model was able to pinpoint the problems that political strategies and urgent actions should seek to tackle, while providing information regarding the variability of the indicators over time.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Buchs, (2021), Ecological Economics, 190, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107176
  • Charnes, (1978), European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp. 429, 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  • De Castro-Pardo, (2021), Land, 10, pp. 469, 10.3390/land10050469
  • De Castro-Pardo, (2022), Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1, 10.1016/j.stae.2022.100002
  • D'Inverno, (2021), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75
  • Dou, (2021), China. Journal of Environmental Management, 290
  • European Environment Agency (2022). Available in: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps Accessed on 13 March 2022.
  • FAO. 2022. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (Accessed 16 March 2022).
  • Guaita Martínez, (2020), Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34, pp. 1
  • Hatami-Marbini, (2013), International Transactions in Operational Research, 20, pp. 411, 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2012.00871.x
  • Howlett, (2017), Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19, pp. 229, 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1207507
  • Kenny, (2019), Ecological Economics, 158, pp. 1, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.025
  • Koronakos, (2021), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 79
  • Lafuente, (2020), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 100864
  • Marangoz, (2022)
  • Mintrom, (2017)
  • Mu, (2018), Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, pp. 709, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.091
  • (2013)
  • Omrani, (2020), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 69, 10.1016/j.seps.2018.12.002
  • Panagos, (2015), Environmental Science & Policy, 54, pp. 438, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012
  • Ruiz, (2021), Sustainability, 13 (3)
  • Scott, (2016), pp. 15, 10.1007/978-981-10-1914-2_2
  • Shen, (2011), International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2, pp. 21
  • Verbunt, (2018), European Journal of Operational Research, 264, pp. 388, 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.061
  • WRI (2022). Aqueduct water risk Atlas. Aqueduct project. Available in: https://www.wri.org/applications/aqueduct/water-risk-atlas/#/?advanced=false&basemap=hydro&indicator=w_awr_def_tot_cat&lat=30&lng=-80&mapMode=view&month=1&opacity=0.5&ponderation=DEF&predefined=false&projection=absolute&scenario=optimistic&scope=baseline&threshold&timeScale=annual&year=baseline&zoom=3 Accesed on January 2022.
  • Eurostat (2022). Available in: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. Accessed on 14 March 2022.
  • Yao, (2020), Journal of Hydrology, 589, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125160
  • Yee, (2015), Ecological Economics, 115, pp. 39, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.016
  • Zadeh, (1965), Information and Control, 8, pp. 338, 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  • Zhao, (2021), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 78, 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101085