Espacios diversos de la sociedad postdigitalretos educativos

  1. Eduardo García Blazquez
  2. Gil Tevar, Simón
  3. Javier Gil Quintana
Journal:
Communiars: Revista de imagen, artes y educación crítica y social

ISSN: 2603-6681

Year of publication: 2024

Issue: 12

Pages: 42-54

Type: Article

DOI: 10.12795/COMMUNIARS.2024.I12.02 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Communiars: Revista de imagen, artes y educación crítica y social

Sustainable development goals

info

SDG classification obtained using Aurora SDG artificial intelligence model.

Abstract

The article examines the post-digital society from the perspective of uncertainty, ignorance, the transparent and invisible, control fluids, emptiness, disappointment, and indignation. In this society, fear has become the norm, with many of its associated risks: pandemics, wars, exclusion of the population, as well as economic and digital divides. These perspectives present five educational challenges: 1. Society characterized by uncertainty. Learn adaptive skills, digital literacy, interdisciplinary education, intercreativity and innovation, and global awareness. 2. A space characterized by ignorance and a lack of knowledge. Educate the public on media literacy. 3. Transparent and invisible spaces. Educate the public in the commitment to be cautious in the face of insecurity and the bombardment of information available to them. 4. Space of "control fluids". Through dialogue, constructive criticism, and consensus, educate n both formal and informal settings. 5. Places of emptiness, indignation, and disappointment. Focus on civic engagement, innovation, and reducing inequalities, privacy concerns, and misinformation

Bibliographic References

  • Aguilera, O. (2023). La ciudad en la era de la sociedad red. EDUWEB, 17(2), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2023.17.02.2
  • Alonso, J. C. G., y Cortes-Ramírez, E.-E. (2023). La translación en “Utopía” de Tomás Moro: un análisis desde la retórica cultural. Castilla: Estudios de Literatura, 14, 295-312. https://doi.org/10.24197/cel.14.2023.295-312
  • Bauman, Z. (2012). Vida de consumo. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Bauman, Z. (2022). Tiempos líquidos: Vivir en época de incertidumbre.Grupo Planeta Spain.
  • Bauman, Z. (2023). Daños colaterales: Desigualdades sociales en la era global. Fondo de Cultura Economica.
  • Beck, U. (1998). La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad.Paidós.
  • Brey. A., Innerarity, D., y Mayos, G. (2009). La sociedad de la ignorancia y otros ensayos. Libros infonomia.
  • Cascone, K. (2000). The Aesthetics of Failure: “Post-Digital” Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music. Computer Music Journal,24(4), 12-18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3681551
  • Cascone, K., &Jandrić, P. (2021). The Failure of Failure: Postdigital Aesthetics against Techno-mystification. Postdigital Science and Education,3(2), 566-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00209-1
  • Castells, M., y Kumar, M. (2014). A conversation with Manuel Castells. Berkeley Planning Journal, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/BP327124502
  • Da Silva Façanha, L. (2023, 31 enero). Educação e filosofia em Rousseau na perspectiva teatral. https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/tede/4611
  • D’Andrea, F., y Galantino, M. G. (2023). Multidimensional risks in the XXI century. EGEA.
  • Escaño, C. (2023). Educación Postdigital: un enfoque desde la pedagogía crítica y mediática para un contexto post-COVID19. Revista Mediterránea De Comunicación, 14(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.23899
  • Fernández-Ardèvol, M., y Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2022). The Network Society Today. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221092800
  • García, M. L. (2023). El desafío digital: informarse, pensar y decidir libremente en la era cibernética. Ediciones Granica, S.A.
  • Han, B. (2013).La sociedad de la Transparencia. Herder Editorial.
  • Han, B. (2015). The burnout society. Stanford University Press.Innerarity, D. (2012). The future and its enemies: In Defense of Political Hope. StanfordUniversity Press.
  • Innerarity, D. (2013). The democracy of knowledge. BloomsburyPublishing USA.
  • Innerarity, D. (2022). La sociedad del desconocimiento. Batiscafo.
  • Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J. y Hayes, S. (2019). Postdigital science and education, Educational Philosophy and Theory. Communiars. Revista deImagen, Artes y Educacion Crítica y Social,2,11-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/Communiars.2019.i02.01
  • Jandrić, P., Escaño, C., & Mañero, J. (2023). Pedagogía crítica postdigital y justicia social bioinformacional. Profesorado, Revista De Currículum Y Formación Del Profesorado, 27(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v27i1.24645
  • Jopling, M. (2023). The Postdigital School. In: Jandrić, P. (eds) Encyclopedia of Postdigital Science and Education.Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_24-2
  • Kortava, S. (2023).Towards a New Modern Ulrich Beck ́s Views on the Transformation of Modern Society. Political Sciences, Sociology, Psychology, 19. https://doi.org/10.52340/sou.2023.19.47
  • Lipovetsky, G. (1983). La era del vacío. Ensayos sobre el individualismo contemporáneo. Anagrama.
  • Lipovetsky, G. (2006). La sociedad de la decepción. Anagrama.
  • Lipovetsky, G. (2016). De la ligereza. Anagrama.
  • Malik, A., Bashir, F., y Mahmood, K. (2023). Antecedents and consequences of misinformation sharing behavior among adults on social media during COVID-19. SageOpen, 13(1).https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221147022
  • McLuhan, M., y Powers, B. R. (2020).La aldea global: Transformaciones en la vida y los medios de comunicación mundiales en el siglo XXI. Editorial Gedisa.
  • Mitchell, R. (2002). The Postdigital Membrane: Imagination, Technology and Desire. Leonardo,35(3), 337-338. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2002.35.3.337b
  • Padilla Caballero, A. M. (2023). La globalización como causa de divergencia cultural.Reforma Siglo XXI, 29(113), 58-61.https://reforma.uanl.mx/index.php/revista/article/view/50
  • Sundberg, L. (2023). Towards the Digital Risk Society: A review. Human Affairs, 34(1), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2023-0057
Data source: Dialnet