The effect of relational training on intelligence quotienta case study

  1. Vizcaíno Torres, Rosa M.
  2. Ruiz, Francisco J.
  3. Luciano Soriano, María Carmen
  4. López López, Juan Carlos
  5. Adrián Barbero
  6. Enrique Gil
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2015

Volume: 27

Issue: 2

Pages: 120-127

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Abstract

Background: Relational training protocols based on Relational Frame Theory (RFT) are showing promising results in increasing intelligence quotient. This case study aimed at analyzing the effect of a training protocol in fluency and flexibility in relational responding on intelligence quotient with a 4-year-old child. Method: The child's cognitive and psychomotor development was evaluated before and after the implementation of the training protocol using the McCarthy's Aptitudes and Psychomotricity Scale (MSCA). The training protocol consisted of a multiple-exemplar-training (MET) in relational framing in accordance with COORDINATION (Phases 1 and 2), OPPOSITION (Phase 3 and 4), and COMPARISON (Phases 5 and 6). The MET protocol was implemented in approximately 12 hours throughout five and one half months. Results: The training was effective in establishing relational responding in OPPOSITION and COMPARISON frames as well as in promoting fluency and flexibility in all the three types of trained relations. After this training, the child showed an increase above 1.5 SD in the General Cognitive Index of the MSCA (from 106 to 131). Conclusions: This case study adds further empirical evidence of the potential of RFT training to improve cognitive abilities and intelligence.

Bibliographic References

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P.M. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with opposite as generalized operant behaviour in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 559-586.
  • Berens, N.M., & Hayes, S.C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for a relational operant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45-71.
  • Cassidy, S., Roche, B., & Hayes, S.C. (2011). A relational frame training intervention to raise Intelligence Quotients: A pilot study. The Psychological Record, 61, 173-198.
  • Cassidy, S., Roche, B., & O’Hora, D. (2010). Relational Frame Theory and human intelligence. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 11, 37-51.
  • Hayes, S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.) (2001). Relational frame theory. A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic.
  • Kaplan, R.M., & Sacuzzo, D.P. (2012). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Inc Fulfillment
  • Luciano, C., Gómez-Becerra, I., & Rodríguez-Valverde, M. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derivedequivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349-365.
  • Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Berens, N.S., Rodríguez-Valverde, M., Mañas, I., & Ruiz, F.J. (2009). Acquiring the earliest relational operants. Coordination, difference, opposition, comparison, and hierarchy. In R.A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding. Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 149-170).Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
  • McCarthy, D. (1988). Escalas McCarthy de aptitudes y psicomotricidad para niños (3rd ed.). Madrid: TEA.
  • Ruiz, F.J., & Luciano, C. (2011). Cross-domain analogies as relating derived relations among two separate relational networks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 95, 369-385.
  • Ruiz, F.J., Suárez, J.J., & López, J.C. (2012). Tratamiento de un caso de autismo a través de entrenamiento en comportamiento relacional derivado [Treatment of case of autism through training in derived relational responding]. In R. Quevedo-Blasco & V.J. Quevedo- Blasco (Eds.), Avances en Psicología Clínica (pp. 609-612). Granada: Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual
Data source: Dialnet