Los juegos de simulación empresarial a través de la educación a distanciaaplicación del juego INTOP en estudios de posgrado

  1. Romero Cuadrado, María Sagrario
  2. Gutiérrez Fernández, Milagros
  3. Rodríguez Carrasco, José Manuel
Revista:
Pecunia: revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales

ISSN: 1699-9495

Año de publicación: 2010

Número: 11

Páginas: 61-83

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.18002/PEC.V0I11.629 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Pecunia: revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales

Resumen

Business games constitute a methodology of special importance, allowing you to bring the student to the business world, where as it is known, bringing proceedings and verify its real impact is virtually impossible. Thanks to these economic reality simulators, students can make decisions and observe its results evaluating the effectiveness of the decision adopted. Therefore, the students begin to be aware of the actual circumstances which will be in their future business. Measuring the level of learning and the possible effects company simulations games can have on the learning is an extremely complex task. This work is intended to contrast with empirical evidence the effectiveness of the business simulation games applied to distance learning students, thus providing added value in simulation games research, in order to empirically demonstrate which are the factors that make the business simulators didactic effectiveness

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arquero, J.L. y Jiménez, S.M. (1999). “Influencia del estudio de casos en la mejora del aprendizaje, adquisición de capacidades no técnicas y motivación en análisis contable”, Revista de Enseñanza Universitaria, extraordinario, pp. 225- 241.
  • Bernard, R.S. (2006). “Characterizing business games used in distance education”, Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 33, pp. 124-130.
  • Brown, G. y Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. Londres: Routledge.
  • Cea D´Ancona, M.A. (2002). Análisis multivariable. Teoría y práctica en la investigación social. Madrid: Ed. Síntesis.
  • Dill, W.R. (1961). “Experience with a complex management game”, California Management Review, 3 (3), pp. 38-51.
  • Domingo, M.A. (2004). “Los juegos de empresa sobre gestión de operaciones en la formación universitaria”, Documento de trabajo no publicado. Universidad de Sevilla.
  • Duck, J. (2005). “Creating dynamic interaction in a virtual world: add value to online classrooms through live e-learning and collaboration”, Development in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 32, pp. 101-103.
  • Elwood, C. (1993). Handbook of management games. Cambridge: Gower Press.
  • Escobar, B. y Lobo, A. (2005). “Juegos de simulación empresarial como herramienta docente para la adaptación al espacio europeo de educación superior”, Cuadernos de Turismo, 16, pp. 85-104.
  • Faria, A.J. (1998). “Business simulation games. Current usage levels: an update”, Simulation & Gaming, 29, pp. 295-308.
  • Faria, A.J. (2000). “The changing nature of simulation research: A brief ABSEL´s history”, Developments in business simulation and experiential learning, 27, pp. 84-90.
  • Faria, A.J. (2001). “The changing nature of simulation research: A brief history”, Simulation & Gaming, 32 (1), pp. 97-110.
  • Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fortmüller, R. (2009). “Learning through business games: Acquiring competences within virtual realities”, Simulation & Gaming, 40 (1), pp. 68-83.
  • Hacer, J.W. (1960). Business games. A simulation tecnique. Iowa: State University of Iowa.
  • Hair, J.; Anderson, R.; Tatham, R. y Black, W. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Nueva Jersey: Pearson.
  • Hsu, E. (1989). “Role-event gaming, simulation in management education: A conceptual framework and review”, Simulation & Gaming, 20 (4), pp. 409-438.
  • Kuljis, J. y Paul, R.J. (2003). “Web- based discrete event simulation models: current states and possible futures”, Simulation & Gaming, 34 (1), pp. 39-53.
  • Letnick, N. (2005). “Distance education delivery of an intensive simulation based course”, Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 32, pp. 186-191.
  • Likert, R. (1932). “A technique for the measurement of attitudes”, Archives of Psychology 140, pp. 1–55.
  • Markovich, D. (2007). “Evaluating simulation learning in a distant learning instructional model”, Development in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 24, pp. 78-79.
  • McConell, H. (1978). “A comprehensive system for item analysis in psychological scale construction”, Journal of Educational Measurement, 15 (2).
  • Mcmanus, A. y Fesinstein, A. (2009). “Implementation of effective experiential learning environments”, Simulation & Gaming, 116 (1), pp. 230- 235.
  • Morales, P. (2000). Medición de actitudes en psicología y educación: construcción de escalas y problemas metodológicos. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas de Madrid.
  • Pérez López, C. (2004). Técnicas de análisis multivariante de datos: aplicaciones con SPSS, Madrid: Ed. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Raia, A.P. (1966). “A study of the educational value of management games”, The Journal of Business, pp. 339-352.
  • Rodríguez Carrasco, J.M. (1975). Juegos de empresa. Madrid: ESIC.
  • Schreier, C.E. (1977). “The role of the administrator in experiential learning and simulation”. En, Nielsen C.C. (Ed.), New horizons in simulation games and experiential learning. Fourth Annual Conference of the Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, Wichita, KS: Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, pp. 177- 186.
  • Smith, J.A. (2005). “Evaluating the direction of research in online education: are we going anywhere?” Developments in business simulations and experiential learning, 32, pp. 340- 343.
  • Stainton, A. (2010). “Educational validity of business gaming simulation: A research methodology framework”, Simulation & Gaming, 41, pp. 705-723.
  • Tejedor, F. y García, A. (1996). Perspectivas de las nuevas tecnologías en la educación. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Thorelli, H.B. (1964). International operations simulation. Nueva York: Free Press.
  • Wellington, D.; Hutchinson, D. y Faria, A.J. (2005). Internet to enhance course presentation: A help or hindrance to student learning. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.
  • Visauta Vinacua, B. (2007). Análisis estadístico con SPSS 14: estadística básica. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Wolfe, D.E. (2000). Medición de actitudes en psicología y educación: construcción de escalas y problemas metodológicos. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas.
  • Wolfe, D.E. y Byrne, E.T. (1976). “A comparison of perceived learning in three pedagogically different sections of a required business policy course”. En, Sord, B. (Ed.), Computer simulation and learning theory. Third International ABSEL Conference, Knoxville, Tennessee. Austin, TX: Bureau of Business Research. The University of Texas at Austin, pp. 474-482.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet