La enseñanza de contenidos científicos a través de un modelo “Flipped”Propuesta de instrucción para estudiantes del Grado de Educación Primaria

  1. González-Gómez, David 3
  2. Jeong, Jin Su 2
  3. Cañada-Cañada, Florentina 3
  4. Gallego Picó, Alejandrina 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03n6nwv02

  3. 3 Universidad de Extremadura
    info

    Universidad de Extremadura

    Badajoz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0174shg90

Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

ISSN: 0212-4521,  2174-6486

Argitalpen urtea: 2017

Alea: 35

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 71-87

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ENSCIENCIAS.2233 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

La metodologia d'instrucció invertida o «flipped-classroom» constitueix una manera d'aprenentatge en el qual s'inverteix el format tradicional d'una classe. En aquesta metodologia, les classes magistrals s'imparteixen «fora de l'aula», així el temps que l'estudiant roman a l'aula s'empra per realitzar activitats d'aprenentatge més centrades en l'alumne, tals com a resolució de problemes / casos pràctics, discussions i treball col·laboratiu. En aquesta recerca es duu a terme un estudi comparatiu entre els resultats d'aprenentatge i percepció d'un grup d'estudiants del Grau d'Educació Primària cap als continguts científics treballats. Els resultats preliminars d'aquest estudi indiquen que els estudiants que van seguir la metodologia flipped van aconseguir millors resultats d'aprenentatge i una millor percepció tant cap al contingut com cap a la metodologia.

€ Ikusi finantzaketa

Finantzaketari buruzko informazioa

Este trabajo ha sido financiado por los proyectos de investigación Proyecto EDU2016-77007-R (AEI/FEDER, UE) y ayuda a grupos GR15009 (Junta de Extremadura y FEDER). Jin Su Jeong agradece al programa Juan de la Cierva Formación (JDC-2015) por su financiación.

Finantzatzaile

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Ash, K. (2012). Educators view the «Flipped» model with a more critical eye. Education Week, 32(2), pp.S6-S7.
  • Baker, C. (2012). Flipped classrooms: turning learning upside down. Deseret News. Disponible en línea: <http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765616415/Flipped-classrooms-Turning-learning-upside -down.html?pg1⁄4all>.
  • Bergmann, J. y Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Maximizing face time. Training & Development, New York.
  • Biggs, J. y tang, C. (2007) Teaching for quality learning at University. Third Edition. The society for research into higher education. Open University Press, UK
  • Bishop, J. L. y verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented a the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-25, Atlanta, GA.
  • Blair, E.; Maharaj, C. y Primus, S. (2015). Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9393-5
  • Bull, G.; Ferster, B. y Kjellstrom, W. (2012). Inventing the flipped classrom. Learning with technology, 40, pp. 10-11.
  • Butt, A. (2014). Student view on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accrediation, 6(1), pp. 33-43.
  • Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Kinshuk y Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model isntead? Computers and Education, 79, pp. 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
  • Christiansen, M. A. (2014). Inverted Teaching: Applying a New Pedagogy to a University Organic Chemistry Class. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), pp. 1845-1850. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400530z
  • Crujeiras Pérez, B. y Jiménez Aleixandre, M. P. (2015). Desafíos planteados por las actividades abiertas de indagación en el laboratorio: articulación de conocimientos teóricos y prácticos en las prácticas científicas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 33(1), pp. 63-84. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1469
  • Davies, R. S.; Dean, D. L. y Ball, N. (2013) Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ Tech Res Dev 61(4), pp. 563-580 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
  • Dávila Acedo, M. A.; Borrachero Cortés, A. B.; Cañada Cañada, F.; Martínez Borreguero, G. y Sánchez-Martín, J. (2015). Evolución de las emociones que experimentan los estudiantes del grado de maestro en educación primaria, en didáctica de la materia y la energía. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 12(3), pp. 550-564.
  • Delozier, S. y Rhodes, M. (2016). Flipped classrooms. A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9
  • Ferreri, S. P. y O’connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe77113
  • Findlay-Thompson, S. y Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education and Accreditation, 6, pp. 63–71.
  • Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning and Leadign with Technology, 39, pp. 12-17.
  • Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., y Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), pp. 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008
  • González-Gómez, D.; Jeong, J. S.; Airado Rodríguez, D.; Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: an initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, pp. 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9
  • Handelsman, J.; Ebert-May, D.; Beichner, R.; Bruns, P.; Chang, A.; Dehaan, R.; Gentile, J.; Lauffer, S.; Steart, J.; Tilghman, S. M., y Wood, W. B. (2004). Policy forum: Scientific teaching. Science, 304, pp. 521-522.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022
  • Herreid, C. F. y Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), pp. 62-66.
  • Hill, J. R., Song, L. y West, R. E. (2009). Social learning theory and web-based learning environments: A review of research and discussion of implications. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), pp. 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640902857713
  • Imran, M. (2013) Increasing the intereaction time in a lecture by integrating flipped classroom and just-in-time teaching concepts. J Learn Teach 7, pp.1-13
  • Jarvis, T. y Pell, A. (2004). Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a tow-year science inservice program and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 26, pp.1787-1811. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243763
  • Jeong, J. S.; González-Gómez, D.; Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016). Students’ perceptions and emotions toward learning in a flipped general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, pp. 747-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9630-8
  • Kim, M. K.; Kim, S. M.; Khera, O. y Getman, J. (2014) The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. Internet High Educ 22, pp. 37-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
  • Knight, J. K. y Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), pp. 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1187/05-06-0082
  • Long, T.; Logan, J. y Waugh, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the value of using videos as a preclass learning experience in the flipped classroom. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4
  • Love, B.; Hodge, A.; Grandgenett, N. y Swift, A. W. (2013). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), pp. 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582
  • Mason, G. S.; Rutar, T. S. y Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 56(4), pp. 430-435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2249066
  • Mattis, K. V. (2015). Flipped classroom versus traditional textbook instruction: Assessing accuracy and mental effort at different levels of mathematical complexity. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(2), pp. 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9238-0
  • Mclaughlin, J. E.; Roth, M. T.; Glatt, D. M.; Gharkholonarehe, N.; Davidson, C. A.; Griffin, L. M. y Mumper, R. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89, pp. 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086
  • Mellado, V.; Borrachero, A. B.; Brígido, M.; Melo, L. V.; Dávila, M. A.; Cañada, F.; Conde, M. C.; Costillo, E.; Cubero, J.; Esteban, R.; Martínez, G.; Ruiz, C.; Sánchez, J.; Garritz, A.; Mellado, L.; Vázquez, B.; Jiménez, R. y Bermejo, M. L. (2014). Las emociones en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 32(3), pp. 11-36.
  • Moraros, J.; Islam, A.; Yu, S.; Banow, R. y Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Medical Education, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2
  • Newman, D. L.; Deyoe, M. M.; Connor, K. A. y Lamendola, J. M. (2015). Flipping STEM leraning: Impact on students’ process of learning and faculty instructional activities. En A. DeMarco (Ed.), Curriculum desing and classroom management: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 23-31).
  • Novak, G.; Gavrin, A.; Christian W. y Patterson E. (1999). Just-in-time teaching: blending active learning with web technology. Prentice Hall, PENNSILVANIA. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19159
  • O’Flaherty, J. y Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
  • Osborne, J.; Simon, S. y Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. Instrumental Journal of Science Education, 25, pp. 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, pp. 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A.; Briggs, D.; Iverson, H.; Talbot, R. y Shepard, L. A. (2011). Impact of undergraduate science course innovations on learning. Science, 331(6022), pp. 1269-1270. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198976
  • Sams, A. y Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students’ learning. Technology-Rich learning, 70(6), pp. 16-20.
  • Sowa, L. y Thorsen, D. (2015). An assessment of student learning, perceptions and social capital develpment in undergraduate, lower-division STEM courses employing a flipped classroom pedaggoy. Paper Presented at the 122nd ASEE Annual Conferencie & Exposition, Seattle, WA.
  • Staker, H. y Horn, M. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute. Disponible en línea: <http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535180.pdf>.
  • Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, pp. 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
  • Tourón, J. y Santiago, R. (2015). Flipped Learning model and the development of talent at school. Revista de Educacion, 368, pp. 33-65.
  • Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Online instruction at home frees class for learning. Education next, 12(1), pp. 82-83.
  • Tune, J. D.; Sturek, M. y Basile, D. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 11(3), pp. 57-77 https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00091.2013
  • Van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I. y Van Der Molen, J. H. W. (2015). Improving primary teacher’ attitudes toward science by attitude-focused professional development. Journal of Research in Scinece Teaching, 52(5), pp. 710-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21218
  • Young, J. R. (2002). «Hybrid» teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chron Higher Educ 48(28):A33-A34
  • Zawilinski, L. M.; Richard, K. A. y Henry, L. A. (2016). Inverting instruction in literacy methods courses: Making learning more active and personalized. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 59(6), pp. 695-708. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.498
  • Sohrabi, B. y Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, pp. 514524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.056
Datuen iturria: Dialnet