Factores determinantes de la primacía global / local del procesamiento en patrones visuales jerárquicos

  1. Luna Blanco, María Dolores
  2. Villarino Vivas, Ángel
  3. Merino Merino, José María
Revista:
Acción psicológica

ISSN: 1578-908X

Año de publicación: 2003

Volumen: 2

Número: 1

Páginas: 9-17

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/AP.2.1.517 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Acción psicológica

Resumen

Two experiments are reported examining whether the size (3 and 15 degrees of visual angle) and exposure duration (10 and 200 msec) of stimuli interacted in determining global/local processing dominance using stimuli whit global and local levels located at the same (Experiment 1) or different retinal locus (Experiment 2). The results showed that global/local processing dominance depends on the size and eccentricity of global and local information. The exposure duration of stimuli modulated global/local dominance processing depending on both, the size of the stimuli and the same/different eccentricity of global and local information.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Amirkhiabani, G. & Lovegrove, W.J. (1996). Role of eccentricity and size in the global precedence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1434- 1447.
  • Amirkhiabani, G. & Lovegrove, W.J. (1999). Do the global advantage and interference effect covary?, Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1308-1319.
  • Breitmeyer, B.G. y Ganz, L. (1977). Temporal studies with flashed gratings: Inferences about human transient and sustained channels. Vision Research, 17, 861-865.
  • Hibi, Y., Takeda, Y. Y Yagi, A. (2002). Global interference: The effect of exposure duration that is substituted for spatial frequency. Perception, 31, 341-348.
  • Hilz, R. y Cavonius, C.R. (1974). Functional organisation of the peripheral retina: sensitivity to periodic stimuli. Vision Research, 14, 1333-1337.
  • Kimchi, R. y Palmer, S.E. (1985). Separability and integrality of global and local levels of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,11, 673-688.
  • Kinchla, R.A. y Wolfe, J.M. (1979). The order of visual processing: Top-down, bottom-up or middle-out. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 225-231.
  • Lasaga, M. y Luna, D. (1992). Processing dominance effects of the size and number of local elements. Fifth Meeeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology. Paris.
  • Luna, D. (1993). Effects of exposure duration and eccentricity of global and local information on processing dominance. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 183-200.
  • Luna, D.; Marcos-Ruiz, R. & Merino, J.M. (1995). Selective attention to global and local information: Effects of visual angle, exposure duration and eccentricity on processing dominance. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-200.
  • Luna, D., Merino, J.M. y Villarino, A. (2002). Influencia de factores estimulares y atencionales en la primacía del procesamiento de la información global y local. Acción Psicológica, 3, 253-261.
  • Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing : The role of sparsity. Memory and Cognition, 7, 476- 484.
  • May, J.G.; Gutierrez, C. & Harsin, Ch. A. (1995). The time-course of global precedence and consistency effects. International Journal of Neuroscience, 80, 237-245.
  • Merino, J.M. y Luna, D. (1997a). Influencia de la posición retiniana de la información global y local sobre la transición en el orden de procesamiento. Psicológica, 18, 119-138.
  • Merino, J.M. y Luna, D. (1997b). Procesos sensoriales y primacía de la información global y local. Cognitiva, 9, 159-173.
  • Modigliani, V., Bernstein, D. y Govorkov, S. (2001). Attention and size in a global/local task. Acta Psychologica, 108, 35-51.
  • Nachmias, J. (1967). Effect of exposure duration on visual contrast sensitivity with square-wave gratings. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 421-427.
  • Navon, D. (1977). Forest before the trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception”. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
  • Navon, D. (1981a). The forest revisited: more on global precedence. Psychologucal Research, 43, 1-32.
  • Navon, D. (1981b). Do attention and decision follow perception? Comment on Miller. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1175-1182.
  • Navon, D. (1991). Testing a queue hypothesis for the processing of global and local information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 173-189.
  • Navon, D. & Norman, J. (1983). Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 955-965.
  • Paquet, L. & Merikle, Ph. (1984). Global precedence: The effect of exposure duration. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 45-53.
  • Robson, J.G. y Graham, N. (1981). Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Research, 21, 409-418.
  • Ward, L.W. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 562-582.
  • Ward, L.W. (1983). On processing dominance: Comment on Pomerantz. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 541-546.
  • Watson, A.B. (1982). Summation of grating patches indicates many types of detector at one retinal location. Vision Research, 22, 17-25.
  • Watson, A.B. (1983). Detection and recognition of simple spatial forms. En O.J. Braddick y A.C. Sleigh (Eds.), Physical and biological processing of images (pp.101-114). Berlín: Springer.
  • Wrigth, M.J. & Johnston, A. (1983). Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual locus. Vision Research, 23, 983-989.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet