Individualism: one or many

  1. Morales Domínguez, José Francisco
  2. Gaviria, Elena
  3. Molero Alonso, Fernando
  4. Arias Orduña, Ana Victoria
Aldizkaria:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Argitalpen urtea: 2000

Alea: 12

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 34-44

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Psicothema

Laburpena

Individualismo: uno o muchos. Se plantea que el individualismo es uno más de los polos de la dimensión I-C. Aun más, su sentido no se puede reducir al de un mero conflicto entre el individuo y el grupo y su función tampoco puede reducirse a las comparaciones transculturales, ya que las diferencias en individualismo están presentes a nivel subcultural. 20 grupos de alrededor 10-12 sujetos de 8 Comunidades Autónomas de España participaron en la primera fase de esta investigación. Discutieron libremente varias problemáticas del individualismo- colectivismo propuestas por un entrevistador del grupo de investigación en una entrevista semiestructurada durante una hora y media. Una lista de las diferentes afirmaciones formulada por los grupos se utilizo para conformar dos escalas piloto de alrededor 164 ítems cada una, formas A y B. 997 personas (724 mujeres, 273 hombres) participaron en una segunda fase. La mayoría de ellos eran estudiantes universitarios (media de edad 22,6 años) y provenían de 8 regiones españolas diferentes. En las discusiones de grupo emergieron diferentes problemáticas muy distintas de las implicadas por la dimensión Individualismo- Colectivismo. Las respuestas a las escalas, a pesar de la alta homogeneidad de la muestra reflejaron diferencias asociadas al sexo, la edad, el origen geográfico, la intensidad del sentimiento religioso y las posiciones ideológicas entre otras. Varios análisis de conglomerados descubrieron diferentes combinaciones de respuesta a las facetas del individualismo, lo que sugiere que el individualismo se puede concebir mejor como un fenómeno de «múltiples facetas». En base a estos resultados se analizan las implicaciones para posteriores estudios

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Argyle, M., Henderson, M., Bond, M.H., Iizuka, Y. and Contarello, A. (1986). Cross-cultural variations in relationship rules, International Journal of Psychology, 21, 287-315.
  • Bettencourt, B.A. and Dorr, N. (1997). Collective Self-Esteem as a Mediator of the Relationship between allocentrism and subjective wellbeing, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 955-964 .
  • Bierbrauer, G., Meyer, H. and Wolfradt, U. (1994). Measurement of normative and evaluative aspects in individualistic and collectivistic orientations: The Cultural Orientation Scale (COS). In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 189-199.
  • Bond, M. and Forgas, J.P. (1984). Linking person perception to behavioral intention across cultures,: the role of cultural collectivism, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 337-352.
  • Camps, V. (1993), Paradojas del Individualismo, Barcelona: Crítica.
  • Carden, A.I. and Feicht, R. (1991). Homesickness among Americans and Turkish college students, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22, 418-428.
  • Cialdini, R.B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D.W., Butner, J. and Gornik-Durose, M. (1997). Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists, Arizona State University, Unpublished.
  • Collett, P. and O’Shea, G. (1976). Pointing the way to a fictional place: a study of direction-giving in England and Iran, European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 447-458.
  • Cox, T.H., Lobel, S. and McLeod, P.L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827-847.
  • Cha, J.H. (1994). Aspects of Individualism and Collectivism in Korea. In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications , Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 157-174.
  • Ester, P. Halman, L. and de Moor, R. (1994). The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America, Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
  • Feldman, R.E. (1967). Honesty toward compatriot and foreigner: field experiments in Paris, Athens and Boston. In W.W. Lambert and R. Weisbrod (Eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Psychology, Boston: Little Brown.
  • Furnham, A. (1993). Just World Beliefs in Twelve Societies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 317-329.
  • Gelfand, M.J., Triandis, H.C. and Chan, D.K-S. (1996). Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism?, European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 397-410.
  • Gerganov, E.N., Dilova, M.L., Petkova, K.G. and Paspalanova, E.P. (1996). Culture-Specific Approach to the Study of Individualism/Collectivism, European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 277-297.
  • Ho, D.Y.F and Chiu, C.Y. (1994). Component Ideas of Individualism, Collectivism and Social Organization: an Application to the Study of Chinese Culture. In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 137-156.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences:International Differences in Work Related Values, Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Hui, C. H. (1988) Measurement of Individualism-Collectivism, Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 17-36.
  • Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Kim, U., (1994). Individualism and Collectivism: Conceptual Clarification and Elaboration. In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Kim, U. and colls. (1994). Introduction. In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Kim, U., Triandis, H.C., Kagitçibasi, Ç, Choi. S. and Yoon, G. (1994). In dividualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Lerner, M.J. (1980). The Belief in a Just World, New York: Plenum.
  • Levine, R.V. and Bartlett, C. (1984). Pace of life, punctuality and coronary heart disease in six countries, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 233-255.
  • Levine, R.V. & Norenzayan, A. (1999). The pace of life in 31 countries. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 30, 178-205.
  • Levine, R.V., West, L.J. and Reis, H.T. (1980). Perceptions of time and punctuality in the US and Brazil, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 541-550.
  • MacDonald, K. (1998). Separation and its discontents: toward and evolutionary theory of anti-semitism, Westport: Praeger.
  • Markus, H.R. and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition,Emotion and Motivation, Psychological Review, 98, 224- 253.
  • Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S. and Heimanm R.J. (1996). Culture and «basic» psychological principles. In E.T. Higgins and A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, New York: Guilford Press.
  • Mishra, R.C. (1994). Individualist and collectivist orientations across generations. In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 225-238.
  • Morales, J.F., López-Sáez, M. and Vega, L. (1992). Individualismo, Colectivismo e Identidad Social, Revista de Psicología Social, Monográfico, 49-72.
  • Morales, J.F., López-Saéz, M. and Vega, L. (1998). Discrimination and Beliefs on Discrimination in Individualists and Collectivists. In S. Worchel, J.F. Morales, D. Páez and J.C. Deschamps (Eds.), Social Identity: International Perspectives, London: Sage.
  • Morales. J.F., López. M. and Vega, L. (1999). Influence de l’individualisme sur le comportement social. In J.C. Deschamps, J.F. Morales, D. Páez and S. Worchel (eds.), L’identité sociale: la construction de l’individu dans les relations entre groupes, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
  • Muguerza, J. (1998). El puesto del Hombre en la Cosmópolis, Madrid: UNED.
  • Páez, D., Martínez-Taboada, C., Arróspide, J.J. Insúa, P. and Ayestarán, S. (1998).Constructing Social Identity: The Role of Status, Collective Values, Collective Self-Esteem, Perception and Social Behaviour. In S. Worchel, J.F. Morales, D. Páez and J.C. Deschamps (Eds.), Social Identity: International Perspectives, London: Sage.
  • Rhee, E., Uleman, J.S. and Lee, H.K. (1996). Variations in Collectivism and Individualism by Ingroup and Culture: Confirmatory Factor Analyses, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1.037-1.054.
  • Ros, M. and Grad, H. (1991). El significado del valor trabajo como relacionado a la experiencia ocupacional: una comparación de profesores de E.G. B. y estudiantes de C.A.P., Revista de Psicología Social, 6, 181-208.
  • Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25, San Diego: Academic.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond Individualism/Collectivism: New Cultural Dimensions of Values, In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 85-119.
  • Semin, G.R. and Rubini, M. (1990). Unfolding the concept of person by verbal abuse, European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 463-474.
  • Sinha, D. and Tripathi, R.C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivistic culture: a Case of Coexistence of Opposites. In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.), In dividualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 123-136.
  • Smith, P.B. and Bond, M.H. (1993). Social Psychology across cultures. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Triandis, H.C. (1994). Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Triandis, H.C. (1994). Cross-cultural Industrial and Organizational Psychology. In H.C. Triandis, M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 4, Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 103-171.
  • Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M.J., Asai, M. and Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
  • Triandis, H.C. and Gelfand, M.J. (1998). Converging Measurement of Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
  • Triandis, H., McCusker, C. and Hui, C. (1990). Multimethod Probes of Individualism and Collectivism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
  • Williams, J.E. and Best, D.L., (1990). Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Multination Study, Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Yamaguchi, S. (1994). Collectivism among the Japanese: A Perspective from the Self, In U. Kim and colls. (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 175-188
  • Yankelovich, D.H. (1981). New Rules, New York: Random House.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet