Referentes para la orientación del aprendizaje desde la perspectiva del aprendizaje autorregulado

  1. Anaya Nieto, Daniel
  2. Fernández Suárez, Ana Patricia
  3. Suárez Riveiro, José Manuel
Journal:
Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía

ISSN: 1139-7853,  1989-7448

Year of publication: 2006

Volume: 17

Issue: 1

Pages: 19-32

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5944/REOP.VOL.17.NUM.1.2006.11334 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The concept of self-regulated learning has emerged during the last years generating an investigationline which tries to join the knowlege and investigation on cognitive, affective-motivational and learning environment variables. This construct, althought being under a process of definition and explanation, can provide a good theoretical basis for the understanding and evaluation of students learning process. In this way, we try to underline the main features which in the near future will lead us to theelaboration of resources for its evaluation. Thus, in this work we present its main characteristics, components, current investigation lines and instruments near its evaluation. All in all, we try to help stu-dents development, in educational centres, of what traditionally has been called "learning to learn".

Bibliographic References

  • Álvarez, M. y Fernández, R. (1990). Cuestionario de Hábitos y Técnicas de Estudio. Madrid: TEA.
  • Anaya, D. (2002). Diagnóstico en Educación. Madrid: Sanz y Torres.
  • Avellaneda, M. P., Corps, E. R., Cabezas, M. N. y Polo, A. (2000). Diagnóstico Integral del Estudio. Madrid: TEA.
  • Beltrán, J. (1993). Procesos, estrategias y técnicas de aprendizaje. Madrid: Síntesis Psicología.
  • Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 2, 100-112.
  • Boekaerts, M. (2001). Bringing about change in the classroom: strengths and weaknesses of the self-regulated learning approach. Learning and Instruction, 12 (6), 589-604.
  • Borkowski, J. G. y Muthukrishna, N. (1992). Moving metacognition into the classroom: "Working models" and effective strategy teaching. En M. Pressley, K. R. Harris y J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C. y Laurache, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 317-329.
  • Corno, L. (1986). The metacognitive control components of Self-regulated Learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 333-346.
  • Corno, L. (1995). Comments on Winne: Analytic and systemic research are both needed. Educational Psychologist, 30 (4), 201-206.
  • Entwistle, N. (1995). Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examinations. Educational Psycholgist, 30, 47-54.
  • Garcia, T. y Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (Ed.) (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Pintrich, P. R. y De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40.
  • Pintrich, P. R. y García, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. En M. Maehr y P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 7. Goals and self-regulatory processes. Greenwich, CT: TAI.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W. y De Groot, E. V. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents' motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14 (2), 139-161.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. y Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of themMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (M.S.L.Q.). Ann Arbor, MI: NCRIPTAL: The University of Michigan.
  • Pokay, P. y Blumenfeld, P. C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late en the semester: the role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 41-50.
  • Roces, C., Tourón, J. y González, M. C. (1995). Validación Preliminar del CEAM TT (Cuestionario de Estrategias de Aprendizaje y Motivación TT). Psicológica, 16 (3), 347-366.
  • Román, J. M. y Gallego, S. (1994). Estrategias de Aprendizaje. Madrid: TEA.
  • Schmek, R. R.; Geisler-Brenstein, E. y Cercy, S. P. (1991). Self-concept and learning: the revised inventory of learning processes. Educational Psychology, 11, 343-362.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Sheldon, K. M. y Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24 (5), 546-557.
  • Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (1), 71-81.
  • Suárez, J. M. (2000). Características diferenciales y predictivas del Aprendizaje Autorregulado en estudiantes universitarios. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación. Universidad de A Coruña.
  • Suárez, J. M., González, R., Abalde, E. y Valle, A. (2001). Un modelo explicativo de las influencias de las orientaciones de meta sobre la autorregulación del aprendizaje. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 19 (1), 249-262.
  • Suárez, J. M., González, R. y Valle, A. (2001). Multiple-goal pursuit and its relation to cognitive, self- regulatory, and motivational strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 561-572.
  • Vermunt, J. D. y Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257-280.
  • Weinstein, C. E. (1987). LASSI (Learning and Study Strategies Inventory). Clearwater, FL.: H. & H. Publishing Co.
  • Weinstein, C. E. y Mayer, R. E. (1986). Teaching of learning strategies. En M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. N. York: Macmillan.
  • Winne, P. H. (1995). Jnherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 173-187.
  • Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students' regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (2), 224-235.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. y Martínez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. y Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psycholgy, 80, 284-290.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. y Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-regulated Learning and academic achievement. Theory, research and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Data source: Dialnet