Análisis de la estructura conceptual de categorías semánticas naturales y artificiales en una muestra de pacientes de Alzheimer

  1. Peraita Adrados, Herminia
  2. Moreno Martínez, Francisco Javier
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2006

Volumen: 18

Número: 3

Páginas: 492-500

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aronoff, J.M., Gonnerman, L.M., Andersen, E.S., Kempler, D. y Almor, A. (2003). Implications of distributed representations for semantic processing: evidence from Alzheimer’s disease. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 25, 97-102.
  • Borgo, F. y Shallice, T. (2001). When living things and other «sensory quality» categories behave in the same fashion: a novel category specificity effect. Neurocase, 7, 201-220.
  • Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B. y Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213-261.
  • Caramazza, A., Hillis, A. y Leek, E.C. (1994). The organization of lexical knowledge in the brain: evidence from category and modality-specific deficits. En Hirschfeld, Lawrence A. y Gelman, Susan A. (eds.): Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 68-84). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Caramazza, A., Hillis, A., Rapp, B. y Romani, C. (1990). The multiple semantics hypothesis: multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 161-189.
  • Chan, A.S., Salmon, D.P. y De la Pena, J. (2001). Abnormal semantic network for «animals» but not for «tools» in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 37, 197-217.
  • Cree, G.S. y McRae, K. (2003). Analysing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 2, 163-201.
  • Díaz, M.C., Moreno, F.J., Peraita, H. y Sánchez Bernardos, M. (2001). Deterioro en el proceso de denominación y emparejamiento palabra-oída dibujo en la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Estudios de Psicología, 22, 273-285.
  • Farah, M.J. y McClelland, J.L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 120, 339-357.
  • Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E. y McHugh, P.R. (1975) «Mini-Mental State»: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
  • Galeote, M. y Peraita, H. (1999). Memoria semántica y fluidez verbal en demencias. Revista Española de Neuropsicología, 2-3, 3-17.
  • Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M.A., Hodges, J.R. y Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness and intercorrelation: analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 125-174.
  • Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M.A., Patterson, K., Pratt, K.H. y Hodges, J.R. (2005). Semantic feature knowledge and picture naming in dementia of Alzheimer’s type: a new approach. Brain and Language, 93, 79-94.
  • Gonnerman, L.M., Andersen, E.S., Devlin, J.T., Kempler, D. y Seidenberg, M.S. (1997). Double dissociation of semantic categories in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language, 57, 254-279.
  • Harley, T. y Grant, F. (2004). The role of functional and perceptual attributes: evidence from picture naming in dementia. Brain and Language, 91, 223-234.
  • Laiacona, Barbarotto, Trivelli y Capitani (1993). Disossociazioni semantiche intercategoriali: descrizione di una batteria standardizzata e dati normativi. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 54, 209-248.
  • Laws, K.R. (2005). «Illusions of normality»: a methodological critique of category-specific naming. Cortex 41, 842-851.
  • Mandler, J.M. (1992). How to build a baby II: conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587-604.
  • McRae, K. y Cree, G.S. (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. En E.M.E. Forde y Humphreys (eds.): Category-specificity in mind and brain (pp. 211-249). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychological Review, 81, 267-285.
  • McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D. y Stadlan, E. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 34, 939-944.
  • Peraita, H., Elosúa, R. y Linares, P. (1992). Representación de categorías naturales en niños ciegos de nacimiento. Madrid: Trotta.
  • Peraita, H., Galeote, M., Díaz, C. y Moreno, F.J. (2000). Estudio de la producción verbal de ejemplares de categorías semánticas en una muestra de jóvenes, otra de personas de la tercera edad y una de enfermos de Alzheimer. Revista de Gerontología y Geriatría, 35, 37-43.
  • Peraita, H., Galeote, M. y González-Labra, M.J. (1999). Deterioro de la memoria semántica en pacientes de Alzheimer: evidencia a partir de tareas de definición, clasificación y razonamiento analógico. Psicothema, 4, 917-937.
  • Peraita, H., González-Labra, M.J., Sánchez Bernardos, M.L. y Galeote, M. (2000). Batería de evaluación de la memoria semántica en Alzheimer. Psicothema, 12, 192-200.
  • Peraita, H., Linares, P. y Elosúa, R. (1990). Conceptual representation: thoughts and suggestions form data on a sample of blind subjects. Actas cognitiva, 90, 851-856.
  • Peraita, H., Moreno, F.J. y Díaz, C. (2001, Julio). Is the dichotomy between functional/associative and visual/perceptual features conceptually adequate to address the topic of categorical dissociations? En E. Service (chair): The connection between working memory and long-term memory. Simpsioum realizado en el III Congreso de Memoria ICON, Valencia, España.
  • Sartori, G. y Lombardi, L. (2004). Semantic relevance and semantic disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 439-452.
  • Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Teuber, H.L. (1950). Neuropsychology. En M.R. Harrover (ed.): Recent advances in psychological testing (pp. 30-52). Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Tyler, L.K. y Moss, H.E. (1998). Going, going, gone…? Implicit and explicit tests of conceptual knowledge in a longitudinal study of semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1.313-1.323.
  • Tyler, L.K., Moss, H.E., Durrant-Peatfield, M.R. y Levy, P (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75, 195-231.
  • Warrington, E.K. y McCarthy, R.A. (1987). Categories of knowledge: further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110, 1.273-1.296.
  • Warrington, E.K. y Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-854.