La eficacia en la educación a distancia¿un problema resuelto?

  1. García Aretio, Lorenzo
  2. Ruiz Corbella, Marta
Journal:
Teoría de la educación

ISSN: 1130-3743

Year of publication: 2010

Volume: 22

Issue: 1

Pages: 141-162

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14201/7135 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Teoría de la educación

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Grâce à l�inquiétude suscitée par l�éducation à distance, concernant sa qualité, a été réunie une ample littérature scientifique qui a aidé à détecter les points forts et faibles de cette méthodologie, ce qui a mené à sa constante amélioration. L�une des voies de recherche, a pour objectif de vérifier s�il existe des différences manifestes entre l�enseignement présentiel et l�enseignement à distance. À travers la méthodologie empirique de l�analyse de contenu, nous avons eu accès à des recherches sur le rendement des étudiants dans les deux types de formation, dans le but de détecter des différences significatives entre ces derniers. Cette métaanalyse met en évidence que l�efficacité dans l�enseignement ne dépend ni des ressources technologiques, ni des professeurs, ni des étudiants, quoique tous s�avèrent être décisifs, mais de la qualité de ses conceptions pédagogiques. Avec des conceptions rigoureuses, soit en format présentiel, soit dans la modalité à distance, les résultats ne diffèrent pas de façon significative.

Bibliographic References

  • ANDERSON, T. (2005) Distance learning-Social software's killer ap? Consultado el 17 de junio de 2009. http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8080/dspace/ bitstream/2149/2328/1/distance-learning.pdf.
  • ARSUN, O. I. y KURU, S. (eds.) (2006) iCamp. Innovative, inclusive, interactive & intercultural learning campus. Draft Exploitation Model. Consultado el 12 de julio de 2009. http://www.icamp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2007/ 05/d52-icamp-exploitation-modeldraft.pdf.
  • BAJTELSMIT, J. W. (1990) Study methods in distance education: a summary of five research studies, en MOORE, M. G. (ed.) Contemporary Issues in American Distance Education. New York, Pergamon Press, 181-191.
  • BARKLEY, E. F.; CROSS, K. P. y MAJOR, C. H. (2005) Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • BARRY, M. y RUNYAN, G. (1995) A review of distance learning studies in the U.S. Military. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9 (3), 37-47. (Texto electrónico en Biblioteca UNED).
  • BASU, S. (2005) If there is no significant difference, why should we care? The Journal of Educators Online, 2 (2). Consultado el 23 de junio de 2009. http://www.thejeo.com/Basu%20Conger%20Final.pdf.
  • BATES, A. W. y POOLE, G. (2003) Effective teaching with technology in higher education Foundations for success. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • BERNARD, R. M.; ABRAMI, P. C.; LOU, Y.; BOROKHOVSKI, E.; WADE, A; WOZNEY, L.; ANDREW, P.; FISET, M. y HUANG, B. (2004) How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74 (3), 379-439. (Texto electrónico en Biblioteca UNED). (Pubitemid 39604249)
  • BOYD, D. (2007) The significance of social software, en BURG, T. N. y SCHMIDT, J. (eds.) BlogTalks reloaded: Social software research & cases. Norderstedt, Books on Demand, 15-30. Consultado el 21 de junio de 2009. http://www.danah.org/papers/BlogTalksReloaded.pdf.
  • BRAGG, A. B. (2007) Reflections on pedagogy: Reframing Practice to Foster Informal Learning With Social Software. Consultado el 20 de marzo de 2009. http://matchsz.inf.elte.hu/tt/docs/Anne20Bartlett-Bragg.pdf.
  • BROWN, G. y WACK, M. (1999) The difference frenzy and matching buckshot with buckshot. The Technology Source. Consultado el 12 de mayo de 2009. http://technologysource.org/?view=article&id=320.
  • CHAMBERS, J. A. (2002) This time, we get to do it right. Community College Week, 14 (20), 8-9. (Texto electrónico en Biblioteca UNED).
  • CHANG, T. M. (1983) Distance Learning: On the Design of an Open University. Boston, Kluwer- Nijhoff-Publishing.
  • CHESTER, A. y GWYNNE, G. (1998) Online Teaching: Encouraging Collaboration through Anonymity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4 (2). Consultado el 23 de junio de 2009. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue2/ chester.html.
  • CLARK, R. (1983) Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53 (4), 445-460.
  • CLARK, R. (1994) Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42 (2), 21-29.
  • DANIEL, J. S. (1996) Mega-universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education. London, Kogan Page.
  • DAVIES, T. G. y QUICK, D. (2001) Reducing distance through distance learning: The community college leadership doctoral program at Colorado State University. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 25 (8), 607-620. Consultado el 13 julio, 2009. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ ftinterface~content=a713837753~fulltext=713240930.
  • DAVIS, I. (2005) Talis, Web 2.0 and All That. Internet Alchemy. Consultado el 27 de junio de 2009. http://internetalchemy.org/2005/07/talis-web- 20-and-all-that.
  • FRANKLIN, T. y HARMELEN, M. (2007) Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. JISC. Consultado el 23 de agosto de 2009. http://staff.blog.ui.ac.id/harrybs/files/2008/10/web-2-for-content-for-learning- and-teaching-in-higher-education.pdf.
  • GARCÍA ARETIO, L. (1986) Educación superior a distancia. Análisis de su eficacia. Badajoz, UNED-Mérida.
  • GARCÍA ARETIO, L. (1987) Rendimiento académico y abandono en la educación superior a distancia. Madrid, ICE-UNED.
  • GARCÍA ARETIO, L. (1994) Educación a distancia hoy. Madrid, UNED.
  • GARCÍA ARETIO, L. (coord.) (1997) Investigar para mejorar la calidad de la Universidad. Madrid, UNED.
  • GARCÍA ARETIO, L. (1999) Historia de la educación a distancia. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia (RIED), 2 (1), 11-40. Consultado el 17 de mayo de 2009. http://www.utpl.edu.ec/ried/images/pdfs/vol2-1/historia- de-la-eduacion.pdf.
  • GARCÍA ARETIO, L. (2001) Educación a distancia. De la teoría a la práctica. Barcelona, Ariel.
  • GARCÍA ARETIO, L. (2009) ¿Por qué va ganando la educación a distancia? Madrid, UNED.
  • HILTZ, S. R.; ZHANG, Y. Z. y TUROFF, M. (2002) Studies of Effectiveness of Learning Networks, en MAYADAS, F.; BOURNE, J. y MOORE, J. C. (eds.) Elements of quality online education, vol. 3 in the Sloan-C Series. Needham, MA, Sloan-C.
  • KAYE, A. (1981) Origins and structures. Distance Teaching for Higher and Adult Education. Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
  • KEEGAN, D. (1996) Foundations of distance education. New York, Routledge.
  • KLAMMA, R. y otros (2007) Social software for life-long learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 10 (3), 72-83. Consultado el 23 de junio de 2009. http://www.ifets.info/journals/10-3/6.pdf.
  • KRAJNC, A. (1988) Social isolation and learning effectiveness in distance education. Ziff Papiere 71. Hagen, FernUniversitat. Consultado el 12 de agosto de 2009. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content-storage-01/ 0000019b/80/1e/2e/46.pdf.
  • LEVIN, A. (2004) Social software: What's new. Consultado el 17 de febrero de 2009. http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2004/10/18/social-software-whats- new.php.
  • LÉVY, P. (2004) La inteligencia colectiva. Washington, Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Consultado 1 de julio de 2009. http://inteligenciacolectiva.bvsalud.org/public/documents/pdf/es/ inteligenciaColectiva.pdf.
  • LOCKEE, B.; MOORE, M. y BURTON, J. (2001) Old Concerns with New Distance Education Research. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 24 (2), 60-62. Consultado el 23 de junio de 2009. http://www.coe.ufl.edu/Courses/eme5054/Foundations/Articles/Burton. pdf.
  • MATTHEWS, D. (1999) The origins of distance education and its use in the United States. T.H.E. Journal, 27. Consultado el 17 de julio de 2009. http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst?docId=5001313351.
  • MEANS, B.; TOYAMA, Y.; MURPHY, R.; BAKIA, M. y JONES, K. (2009) Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, U.S. Department of Education. Consultado el 17 de agosto de 2009. http:// www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/ evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.
  • MOORE, M. y THOMPSON, M. M. (1997) The effects of distance learning. Pennsylvania, American Center for the Study of Distance Education, Pennsylvania State University.
  • O'REALLY, T. (2005) What Is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Consultado el 30 de agosto de 2009. http://oreilly.com/web2/ archive/what-is-web-20.html.
  • PAUL, R. (1990) Towards a new measure of success: developing independent learners. Open Learning, 5 (1), 31-38.
  • Ed. en español: Hacia una autonomía del alumno: nueva pauta para medir los logros de una institución de enseñanza abierta, en MARTÍN, E. y AHIJADO, M. La educación a distancia en tiempos de cambio. Madrid, De la Torre, 43-60.
  • PHIPPS, R. y MERISOTIS, J. (1999) What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington DC, The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Consultado el 7 de agosto de 2009. http://www.ihep.org/assets/files/publications/s-z/ WhatDifference.pdf.
  • RESNICK, D. (2000) The Virtual University and college life: Some unintended consequences for democratic citizenship. First Monday, 5 (8). Consultado el 17 de junio de 2009. http://131.193.153.231/www/issues/issue5-8/ resnick/index.html.
  • RICHARDSON, W. (2006) Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and others powerful webtools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press.
  • RIVARD, N. (2002) Yes-online learning works. University Business, 5 (6), 20-21. (Texto electrónico en Biblioteca UNED).
  • ROURKE, L.; ANDERSON, T.; GARRISON, D. R. y ARCHER, W. (2001) Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education. Consultado el 14 de agosto de 2009. http://auspace. athabascau.ca:8080/dspace/bitstream/2149/732/1/ Assessing%20Social%20Presence%20In%20Asynchronous%20Textbased%20Computer%20Conf erencing.pdf.
  • RUSSELL, T. L. (2001) The No Significant Difference Phenomenon: A Comparative Research Annotated Bibliography on Technology for Distance Education. Montgomery, AL, IDECC.
  • SABA, F. (2000) Research in distance education: a status report. International Review of research in Open and Distance Learning, 1 (1), 2-9. Consultado el 27 de junio de 2009. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/ article/view/4/24.
  • SCHRAMM, W. (1962) What We Know About Learning from Instructional Television, en Educational television: The next ten years. Stanford CA, The Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University. Consultado el 17 de mayo de 2009. http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=58715345.
  • SHACHAR, M. y NEUMANN, Y. (2003) Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. Consultado el 17 de junio de 2009. http://www.scribd.com/doc/3569335/Differences-Between- Traditional-and-Distance- Education-Academic-Performances.
  • SIEMENS, G. (2004) Conectivismo: una teoría del aprendizaje para la era digital. Consultado el 27 de junio de 2009. http://www.diegoleal.org/ docs/2007/Siemens(2004)-Conectivismo.doc.
  • SIGALES, C. (2002) El potencial interactivo de los entornos virtuales de enseñanza y aprendizaje en la educación a distancia. Consultado el 18 de agosto de 2009. http://www.uoc.edu/web/esp/art/uoc/sigales0102/ sigales0102.html.
  • STYLES, C. (2006) How Web 2.0 will change history. Consultado el 17 de marzo de 2009. http://catherinestyles.files.wordpress.com/2006/08/web20history1. pdf.
  • TAIT, A. (2000) Students and attachment: the nature of electronic relationships. Adult Learning, 11 (10), 20-22. (Texto electrónico en Biblioteca UNED).
  • WEILER, K. (1991) Freire and a feminist pedagogy of difference. Harvard Educational Review, 61 (4), 449-474. (Texto electrónico en Biblioteca UNED).
Data source: Dialnet