¿Cuáles son las razones subyacentes al éxito educativo de Corea del Sur?

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• BELL, D. and HAHM, C. (Eds.) (2003): Confucianism for the modern world (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
• BELLAH, R. (1968): Reflections on the Protestant ethic analogy in Asia, In S. N. Eisenstadt (Ed.), The Protestant ethic and modernization: A comparative view (New York, Basic Books).
• BERGER, P. L. (1986): The Capitalist revolutions: Fifty propositions about prosperity, equality and liberty (New York, Basic Books).
• CHONG, W. S. (1986): Zeal for Education, Korea Journal, 26, pp. 45-51.
• CHUNG, J-S. (1994): Women’s Unequal Access to Education in South Korea, Comparative Education Review, 38, 4.
• DEUCHLER, M. (1992): The Confucian transformation of Korea: A study of society and ideology (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
• JEONG, I. and ARMER, J. M. (1994): State, Class and Expansion of Education in South Korea: A General Model, Comparative Education Review, 38, 4.
• HAHM, C. (2004): The ironies of Confucianism, The Journal of Democracy, 15, 3, July, pp. 93-107.
• HWANG, B. T. (1979): Confucianism in modernisation: Comparative study of China, Japan and Korea (Tesis doctoral) (Berkeley, University of California).
• KAHN, H. (1979): World economic development: 1979 and beyond (Boulder, Westview Press).
• Kim, S. B. (1983): Recent Development of Higher Education in Korea: Quantity, Quality and Equality, Korea Journal, 23, pp. 20-30.
• Kim, T. (2009): Confucianism, Modernities and Knowledge: China, South Korea and Japan, in R. Cowen and A. M. Kazamias (eds.), International Handbook of Comparative Education, pp. 857-872 (London, Springer).
• Kwon, K. (2007): Economic development in East Asia and a critique of the postConfucian thesis, Theory and Society, 36 (1), pp. 55-83.
• LEE, S.-H. (2006): A topography of Confucian discourse: Politico-philosophical reflections on Confucian discourse since modernity (New Jersey, Homa&Sekey Books).
• Leung, F. K. S. (1998): The implications of Confucianism for education today, The Journal of Thought, 33 (2), pp. 25-36.
• LODGE, G. and VOGEL, E. (Eds.) (1987): Ideology and national competitiveness: An analysis of nine countries (Boston, Harvard Business School Press).
• MCGINN, N. (1980): Education and development in Korea (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
• MORISHIMA, M. (1982): Why has Japan succeeded? Western technology and the Japanese ethos (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
• OECD (2010a): What Students Know and Can Do: Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Vol.1. (Paris, OECD).
• OECD (2010b): PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming Social Background — Equity in Learning Opportunities and Outcomes (Volume II) (Paris, OECD).
• ROBINSON, J. (1994): Social Status and Academic Success in South Korea, Comparative Education Review, 38, 4.
• SNYDER, T. D. and HOFFMAN, C. M. (1995): Digest of Education Statistics 1995 (Washington, U.S. Department of Education).
• SORENSEN, C. W. (1994): Success and Education in South Korea, Comparative Education Review, 38, 1.
• Tai, H.-C. (1989): The Oriental alternative: An hipótesis on cultura and economy, in H.-C. Tai (Eds), Confucianism and economic development: an Oriental alternative, pp. 6-37 (Washington D. C., The Washington Institute Press).
• TU, W.-M. (1996) (Ed.): Confucian traditions in East Asian modernity (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
• VIDAL, F. y MOTA, R. (2009): La Encuesta de la Infancia 2008 (Madrid, Fundación SM y Universidad Pontificia de Comillas).
• VOGEL, E. (1979): Japan as number one (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
• WATKINS, D. A. & BIGGS, J. B. (Eds.) (1996): The Chinese learner, cultural psy- chological and contextual influence (Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre).