Nivel de educación y adopción de e-serviciosuna aplicación al caso del e-gobierno

  1. Medina Molina, Cayetano
  2. Rey Moreno, Manuel
  3. Rufín Moreno, Ramón
Zeitschrift:
Sociología y tecnociencia: Revista digital de sociología del sistema tecnocientífico

ISSN: 1989-8487

Datum der Publikation: 2012

Ausgabe: 2

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 22-43

Art: Artikel

Andere Publikationen in: Sociología y tecnociencia: Revista digital de sociología del sistema tecnocientífico

Zusammenfassung

A large majority of Governments are trying to achieve the development and acceptance of its projects of e-Government as a way to improve the perceived quality of the services it provides and to facilitate access to them. Once developed various models that explain the adoption of e-Government, is stated the need to study this phenomenon jointly with the digital divide. In this line, this work analyses the moderator role played by the educational level of citizens in the adoption of e-Government, concluding that the educational level moderates the relationship between the effort expectancy and social influence and use intention. To the contrary arises that the educational level of the citizen doesn't moderate the relationship between the performance expectancy and use intention, neither the one that linked to this last and facilitating conditions with the use of e-Government platforms.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Affisco, J.F., Soliman, K.S. (2006). E-government: a strategic operations management framework for service delivery. Business Process Management Journal, 12(1), 13-21.
  • Akman, I., Yazici, A., Mishra, A., Arifoglu, A. (2005). E-Government: A global view and a empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 239-257.
  • Al-Shafi, S., Weerakkody, V. (2010). Factors Affecting e-Government adoption in the state of Quatar. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, April 12-13 (2009), Abu Dhabi
  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 285-309.
  • Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. (2006). User-centered e-government: Challenges and benefits for government Web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 163-168.
  • Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. (2008). The e-government paradox: Better customer service doesn`t necessarily cost less. Government information Quarterly, 25, 149-154.
  • Bertot, J.C., Snead, J.P., Jaeger, P.T., McClure, C.R. (2006). Functionality, usability, and accessibility: Iterative user-centred evaluation strategies for digital librarians. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 7(1), 17-28.
  • Beynon-Davies, P., Martins, S. (2004). Electronic local government and the modernization agenda: Progress and prospects for public service improvement. Local Government Studies, 30(2), 214-229.
  • Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvonen, K., Puhakainen, J., Walden, P. (2006). Adoption of mobile devices/servicessearching for answers with the UTAUT. In: 39 th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 1-10.
  • Coca, J.R., Valero, J.A., Randazzo, F. (2010). Gap in Techno-Scientific Activity: The Iberoamerican Context. Studies in Sociology of Science, 1 (2), 30-39.
  • Chan, F.K.Y., Thong, J.Y.L., Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Hu, P.J-A., Tam, K.T. (2010). Modeling Citizen Satisfaction with Mandatory Adoption of an E-Government Technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(10), 519-549.
  • Chin, W.W., Newsted, P.R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In Hoyle (ed.). Statistical Strategies for Small Samples Research (307-341). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Dwivedi, Y.K., Weerakkody, V., Williams, M.D. (2009). Guest editorial: From implementation to adoption: Challenges to successful E-Government Diffusion. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 3-4.
  • Falk, R.F., Miller, N.B. (1992). A Primer for soft modelling. Akron Ohio: University of Akron Press.
  • Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Gupta, B., Dasgupta, S., Gupta, A. (2008). Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 140-154.
  • Helbig, N.C., Gil-García, J.R., Ferro, E. (2005). Understanding the Complexity in Electronic Government: Implications from the Digital Divide Literature. Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, N.C., 11-14 Agosto.
  • Henseler, J., Fassott, G. (2010). Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models: An Illustration of Available Procedures. In. V. Esposito et al (eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares, Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 713-735
  • Jaeger, P.T. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 323-331.
  • Layne, K., Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-Government: A four-stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122-136.
  • Li, J.P., Kishore, R. (2006). How Robust is the UTAUT Instrument? A multigroup Invariance Analysis in the Context of Acceptance and Use of Online Community Weblog Systems. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, 183-189.
  • Loo, W.H., Yeow, P.H.P., Chong, S.C. (2009). User acceptance of Malaysian government multipurpose smartcard applications. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 358-367.
  • Losh, S.C. (2003). Gender and educational digital chasms in computer and Internet access and use over time: 1982-2000. IT and Society, 1(4), 73-86.
  • Muñoz-Cañavate, A., Hípola, P (2011). Electronic administration in Spain: From its beginnings to the present. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 74-90.
  • Park, J.K., Yang, S.J., Lehto, X. (2007). ADOPTION OF MOBILE TECNOLOGIES FORN CHINESE CONSUMERS. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8 (3), 196-206.xpayers` intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 636-644.
  • Rigdon, E.E., Schumacker, R.E, Wothke, W. (1998). A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear modeling. In R.E. Schumacker y G.A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1-16.
  • Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Will, A. (2008). SmartPLS 2.0 (Beta). University of Hamburg: Hamburg, Germany, 2005. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.de
  • Rivera, E. (2006). Conceptos y problemas de la construcción del gobierno electrónico. Gestión y Opinión Pública, XV (2), 569-305.
  • Schaupp, L.C., Carter, L., McBride, M.E. (2010). E-file adoption: A study of U.S. taxpayers` intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 636-644.
  • Schellong, A. (2005). CRM in the public sector: Towards a conceptual research framework. Proceedings of the 2005 national conference on digital government research.
  • Spior , J.C., Ward, B.T. (2005). Bridging the Digital Divide for e-Government inclusion. A United States Case Study. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(3), 137-146.
  • Streib, G., Navarro, I. (2006). Citizen demand for interactive E-Government: the case of Georgia consumer services. American Review of Public Administration, 36(3), 288-300.
  • Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2009), Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 333-340.
  • Van Dijk, J., Peters, O., Ebbers, W. (2008). Explaining the acceptance and use of government internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 379-399.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G. (2000). Why Don´t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence and their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Ackerman, P.L. (2000). A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision Making Processes. Organizational and Human Decision Processes, 83 (1), 33-60.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  • Verdegem, P., Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 487-497.
  • Wang, Y-S., Shih, Y-W. (2009). Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 158-165.
  • Yuen, Y.Y., Yeow, P.H., Lim, N., Saylani, N. (2010). Internet banking adoption: comparing developed and developing countries. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 52-61