Representación gráfica de documentos para extracción automática de relaciones

  1. Cabaleiro Barciela, Bernardo
  2. Peñas Padilla, Anselmo
Revista:
Procesamiento del lenguaje natural

ISSN: 1135-5948

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 49

Páginas: 57-64

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Procesamiento del lenguaje natural

Resumen

Este artculo presenta un sistema de representacion de documentos orientado a la compactacion, integracion y simpli cacion de informacion. El sistema genera grafos a nivel de documento a partir de arboles de dependencias sintacticas haciendo explcita la semantica de algunas aristas. El objetivo es crear una representaci on util para multiples tareas de procesamiento de lenguaje natural, entre ellas la extraccion automatica de relaciones, para la que realizamos una evaluacion extrnseca cuantitativa.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Artiles, Javier, Qi Li, Taylor Cassidy, Suzanne Tamang, y Heng Ji. 2011. Cuny blender tac-kbp2011 temporal slot filling system description. En Proceedings of the Text Analysis Conference.
  • Banko, Michele, Michael J. Cafarella, Stephen Soderl, Matt Broadhead, y Oren Etzioni. 2007. Open information extraction from the web. En In IJCAI, páginas 2670-2676.
  • Beth, Sundheim. 1995. Proceedings of the sixth message understanding conference. MUC-6, Columbia, MD.
  • Chinchor, Nancy A. 1998. Overview of proceedings of the seventh message understanding conference. En Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference, MUC-7, Fairfax, VA.
  • Clark, Peter y Phil Harrison. 2009. Largescale extraction and use of knowledge from text. En Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Knowledge capture, K-CAP '09, páginas 153-160, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  • Grishman, Ralph y Beth Sundheim. 1996. Message understanding conference-6: a brief history. En Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, ICCL, páginas 466-471.
  • Hasler, Laura, Constantin Orasan, y Karin Naumann. 2008. Nps for events: Experiments in coreference annotation.
  • Heim, Irene, 1983. File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness, páginas 164-189. Walter de Gruyter.
  • Humphreys, Kevin, Robert Gaizauskas, y Saliha Azzam. 1997. Event coreference for information extraction.
  • Ji, Heng y Ralph Grishman. 2011. Knowledge Base Population: Successful Approaches and Challenges. En ACL HLT 2011, páginas 1148-1158.
  • Ji, Heng, Ralph Grishman, y Hoa Trang Dang. 2011. Overview of the tac2011 knowledge base population track. En Text Analysis Conference, TAC 2011 Workshop, Notebook Papers.
  • Karttunen, Lauri. 1968. What do referential indices refer to? Rand Corporation: [Paper]. Rand Corp.
  • Klein, Dan y Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. En ACL 2003, páginas 423-430.
  • Maynard, Diana, Kalina Bontcheva, y Hamish Cunningham. 2003. Towards a semantic extraction of named entities. En In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing.
  • McNamee, Paul y Hoa T. Dang. 2009. Overview of the TAC 2009 knowledge base population track. En TAC 2009.
  • Mel'cuk, Igor y Alain Polguère. 1987. A formal lexicon in the meaning-text theory (or how to do lexica with words). Computational Linguistics, 13(3-4):261-275.
  • Peñas, Anselmo y Eduard Hovy. 2010. Filling knowledge gaps in text for machine reading. En Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, COLING '10, páginas 979-987, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Peñas, Anselmo y Ekaterina Ovchinnikova. 2012. Unsupervised acquisition of axioms to paraphrase noun compounds and genitives. En (Ed.): CICLing 2012, Part I, LNCS 7181, páginas 388-401, Springer-Verlag.
  • Pradhan, Malcolm, Gregory Provan, Blackford Middleton, y Max Henrion. 1994. Knowledge engineering for large belief networks. En Proceedings of the Tenth international conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, UAI'94, páginas 484-490, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
  • Recasens, Marta. 2010. Coreference: Theory, annotation, resolution and evaluation.
  • Schank, Roger C. 1972. Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psychology, 3(4):552{631, October.
  • Surdeanu, Mihai, Sonal Gupta, John Bauer, David McClosky, Angel X. Chang, Valentin I. Spitkovsky, y Christopher D. Manning. 2011. Stanford's distantlysupervised slot-filling system. En Proceedings of the Fourth Text Analysis Confe- rence (TAC 2011), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, November.
  • Verhagen, Marc, Inderjeet Mani, Roser Sauri, Robert Knippen, Seok Bae Jang, Jessica Littman, Anna Rumshisky, John Phillips, y James Pustejovsky. 2005. Automating temporal annotation with TARSQI. En ACLdemo'05.