Audiovisual Reception and MALLAdapting Technology to Real Needs

  1. Talaván Zanón, Noa
  2. Ávila Cabrera, José Javier
Aldizkaria:
Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

ISSN: 1697-7467

Argitalpen urtea: 2015

Zenbakia: 24

Orrialdeak: 33-46

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.30827/DIGIBUG.53789 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Abdalhamid, F. (2012). Listening Comprehension Strategies of Arabic-­Speaking ESL Learners. (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University).
  • Albers, M. and Kim, L. (2002). “Information design for the small-screen interface: An overview of Web design issues for personal digital assistants”, in Technical Communication, 49, 1: 45-60.
  • Bacon, S.M. (1992a). “The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language learning”, in Modern language Journal, 76: 160-178.
  • Bacon, S.M. (1992b). “Phases of listening to authentic input in Spanish: A descriptive study”, in Foreign Language Annals, 25, 4: 317-334.
  • Brown, G. (1995). Speakers, Listeners and Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Calle, C., Rodríguez-Arancón, P. and Arús-Hita, J. (2014). “A scrutiny of the educational value of EFL mobile learning applications”, in Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, in press.
  • Castrillo de Larreta-Azelain, M.D. (2014). “Learners attitudes toward collaborative writing in e- language learning classes: A twitter project for German as a foreign language”, in Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA) 26: 127-138, available from http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4597559, accessed 20 January, 2014.
  • Chamot, A.U. and Kupper, L. (1989). “Learning strategies in foreign language instruction”, in Foreign Language Annals, 22: 13-24.
  • Chinnery, G.M. (2006). “Emerging technologies. Going to the mall: Mobile assisted language learning”, in Language and Learning & Technology 10, 1: 9-16, available from http://llt. msu.edu/vol10num1/emerging/default.html, accessed 15 December, 2014.
  • Cohen, A.D. (1980). Testing Language Ability in the Classroom. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
  • Colpaert, J. (2006). “Pedagogy-driven design for online language teaching and learning”, in CALICO journal 23, 3: 477-497, available from https://www.calico.org/a-102-Pedagogydriven+Design+for+Online+Language+Teaching+and+Learning.html, accessed 5 November, 2013.
  • Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forchini, P. (2009). “Spontaneity reloaded: American face-to-face and movie conversation compared”, in Abstracts of the 5th Corpus Linguistics Conference. Liverpool, 118.
  • Friends. (1994-2004). Crane, D. and Kauffman, M. Warner Bros. Television and Bright/Kauffman/ Crane Productions. USA.
  • Fujita, J.N. (1985). A Preliminary Inquiry into the Successful and Unsuccessful Listening Strategies of Beginning College Japanese Students. (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45: 2424A.
  • Goh, C. (2002). Teaching Listening in the Language Classroom. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
  • Henner Stanchina, C. (1987). “Autonomy as metacognitive awareness: Suggestions for training self- monitoring of listening comprehension”, in Mélanges Pédagogiques 69-84, available from http://www.atilf.fr/IMG/pdf/melanges/6hennerstanchina.pdf, accessed 10 December, 2013.
  • Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, S.-H. and Lin, Y.-T. (2012). “A ubiquitous English voca-­ bulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use”, in Computers and Education, 58: 273-282.
  • Moreira, M.L. (1996). On Listening Comprehension: Linguistic Strategies Used by Second Language Learners in Non-Collaborative Course. (Doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56: 3562A.
  • Murphy, J.M. (1985). “An investigation into the listening strategies of ESL college students”, in ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED27875, available from http://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/ED278275.pdf, accessed 10 October, 2013.
  • Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Florencia, Kentuky: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  • O’Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U. and Kupper, L. (1989). “Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition”, in Applied Linguistics, 29: 331-341.
  • Ogata, H. and Yano, Y. (2005). “Knowledge awareness for computer-assisted language learning using handhelds”, in International Journal of Learning Technology, 5, 1: 435-449.
  • Pardo-Ballester, C. (2012). “CALL evaluation: students’ perception and use of LoMasTv”, in CALICO Journal 29, 3: 532-547, available from http://journals.sfu.ca/CALICO/index.php/calico/article/view/22/42, accessed 20 December, 2013.
  • Pavesi, M. (2012). “The potentials of audiovisual dialogue for second language acquisition”, in P. Alderete-Díez, L. Incalcaterra McLoughlin, L. Ní Dhonnchadha and D. Ní Uigín (eds.), Translation, Technology and Autonomy in Language Teaching and Learning. Oxford: Peter Lang, 155-174.
  • Quaglio, P. (2009). Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Rodríguez Martín, M.E. and Moreno Jaén, M. (2009). “Teaching conversation through films: A comparison of conversational features and collocations in the BNC and a micro-corpus of movies”, in The International Journal of Learning, 16, 7: 445-58.
  • Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and Researching Listening. London: Longman.
  • Rubin, J. (1988). Improving Foreign Language Listening Comprehension. Washington DC: US Department of Education.
  • Schmidt-Rinehart, B.C. (1992). The Effects of Topic Familiarity on Second Language Listening Comprehension of University Students of Spanish. (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University).
  • Talaván, N. (2007). “Learning vocabulary through authentic video and subtitles”. TESOL-­SPAIN Newsletter, 31: 5-8.
  • Talaván, N. (2010). “Claves para comprender la destreza de la comprensión oral en lengua extranjera”, in EPOS 26: 198-216, available from http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/ articulo?codigo=3858352, accessed 16 March, 2013.
  • Talaván, N. (2013). La subtitulación en el aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras. Barcelona: Octaedro.
  • Traxler, J. (2005). “Defining mobile learning”, in Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning. Malta, 261-266.
  • Vandergrift, L. (1997). “The comprehensive strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study”, in Foreign Language Annals, 30: 387-409.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2005). “Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening”, in Applied Linguistics, 26: 70-89.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2011). “L2 listening: Presage, process, product and pedagogy”, in E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, Volume II. New York: Routledge, 455-471.
  • Viberg, O. and Grönlund, Å. (2012). “Mobile assisted language learning: A literature review”, in mLearn 9-16, available from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-955/papers/paper_8.pdf, accessed 27 November, 2013.
  • Zou, B. (2013). “Teachers’ support in using computers for developing students’ listening and speaking skills in pre-sessional English courses”, in Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26, 1: 83-99.