Returning Home versus Movement without Returna Levinasian Reading of John Banville's The Sea

  1. Cerezo Moreno, Marta
Revue:
Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos

ISSN: 0210-6124

Année de publication: 2015

Volumen: 37

Número: 1

Pages: 51-68

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos

Résumé

Taking as its starting point the contrast Emmanuel Levinas outlines between returning to consciousness as homecoming and the theory of the trace of the other as a movement towards alterity, or a movement without return, this paper analyses how the narrative configuration of John Banville�s The Sea (2005) shows an internal dialectic between an inner and an outer movement. It centres on the study of Max and his wife Anna, the protagonists of the novel, as fictional impersonations of this dual dynamic. Framed within the Levinasian perception of totality as the reduction of the other to the same, this paper envisions Max�s return home as a totalising journey that constitutes individuality. Parallel to Max�s inner exploration, it regards Anna�s photographs of her fellow patients during her stay at the hospital�as a terminal stomach cancer patient�as a representation of Levinas� conceptualisation of infinite responsibility for the other. By merging the philosopher�s theory of the trace of the other with Walter Benjamin�s theory of the optical unconscious and Roland Barthes� photographic concept of the punctum, it will be shown how Anna�s pictures call for new social ethical narratives around terms of social integration and equality for disabled people that could dismantle restrictive, and in Levinas� terms, ontological conceptions of normality.

Références bibliographiques

  • Banville, John. 2005. The Sea. London: Picador.
  • Barthes, Roland. (1980) 2000. Camera Lucida. London: Vintage Books.
  • Benjamin, Walter. (1936) 1969. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Translated by Harry Zohn and edited by Hannah Arendt, 217-52. New York: Schocken Books.
  • Benjamin, Walter. 1999. “Little History of Photography.” In Vol. 2. Part. 2 of Selected Writings: 1931- 1934. 4 vols., edited by Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland and Gary Smith, 507-30. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
  • Bevis, Kathryn. 2007. “‘Better than Metaphors?’ Dwelling and the Maternal Body in Emmanuel Levinas.” Literature & Theology 21 (3): 317-29.
  • Brownell, Laura Camille. 2010. “‘To Sweeten Ireland’s Wrong’: The Presence of Postcolonial Trauma in Contemporary Irish Fiction.” Master’s thesis, California State University. Online access.
  • Creed, Barbara. (1993) 2007. The Monstrous Feminine. Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
  • D’Hoker, Elke. 2002. “Portrait of the Other as a Woman with Gloves: Ethical Perspectives in John Banville’s The Book of Evidence.” Critique 44 (1): 23-37.
  • Elo, Mika. 2007. “Walter Benjamin on Photography: Towards Elemental Politics.” Transformations 15. http://www.transformationsjournal.org/journal/issue_15/article _01.shtml.
  • Eubanks, Cecil L. and David J. Gauthier. 2011. “The Politics of the Homeless Spirit: Heidegger and Levinas on Dwelling and Hospitality.” History of Political Thought 32 (1): 125-46.
  • Facchinello, Monica. 2010. “‘The Old Illusion of Belonging’: Distinctive Style, Bad Faith and John Banville’s The Sea.” Estudios Irlandeses 5: 33-44.
  • Gallop, Jane. 1988. Thinking Through the Body. New York: Columbia UP.
  • Imhof, Rüdiger. 2006. “The Sea: ‘Was It Well Done?’” Irish University Review 36 (1): 165-81.
  • Iversen, Margaret. 1994. “What is a Photograph?” Art History 17 (3): 450-64.
  • Izarra, Laura P. Z. 2006. “Disrupting Social and Cultural Identities: A Critique of the Ever-Changing Self.” Irish University Review 36 (1): 182-99.
  • Katz, Claire Elise. 2003. Levinas, Judaism, and the Feminine. The Silent Footsteps of Rebecca. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana UP.
  • Kenny, John. 2006. “Well Said Well Seen: The Pictorial Paradigm in John Banville’s Fiction.” Irish University Review 36 (1): 52-67.
  • Levinas, Emmanuel. (1963) 1986. “The Trace of the Other.” In Deconstruction in Context, edited by Mark Taylor, 345-59. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
  • Levinas, Emmanuel. (1969) 2005. Totality and Infinity. An Essay on Exteriority. Pennsylvania: Dusquene UP.
  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. “Philosophy and the Idea of Infinity.” In Collected Philosophical Papers. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Dordrecth, Boston and Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Maddrell, Avril. 2012. “Mapping Grief and Memory in John Banville’s The Sea.” In Geography and Memory. Explorations in Identity, Place and Becoming, edited by Owain Jones and Joanne Garde Hansen, 58-67. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • McCarthy, Karen Anne. 2012. “‘An Art Which is Honest Enough to Despair and Yet Go on’: The Limitations and Potential of Narrative in Three Contemporary Irish Novels.” Master’s thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg. https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10210/8457/McCarthy%20 2013%20w.pdf?sequence=1.
  • O’Connell, Mark. 2011. “The Empathic Paradox: Third-Person Narration in John Banville’s First Person Narratives.” Orbis Litteratum 66 (6): 427-47.
  • O’Connell, Mark. 2013. John Banville’s Narcissistic Fictions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Palazzolo, Pietra. 2005. “Telling Stories: Alterity and Ethics in John Banville’s The Untouchable and Shroud.” In Textual Ethos Studies: Or Locating Ethics, edited by Anna Fahraeus and Ann Katrin Jonsson, 145-59. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.
  • Peters, Susanne. 2008. “John Banville: The Sea (2005).” In Teaching Contemporary Literature and Culture, vol. 2, Novels, edited by Susanne Peters, Klaus Stierstorfer and Laurenz Volkmann, 37-54. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
  • Robbins, Jill. 2001. Is it Righteous to Be?: Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford UP.
  • Sanford, Stella. 2002. “Levinas, Feminism and the Feminine.” In The Cambridge Companion to Levinas, edited by Simon Critchley and Robert Bernasconi, 139-60. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Savkay, Canan. 2011. Ethics, Self and the Other. A Levinasian Reading of the Postmodern Novel. Bloomington: Author House.
  • Siegel, Elisabeth. 2007. “‘Another Fleeting Image’: Pictorial Memory in John Banville’s The Sea.” In Intermedialities, edited by Werner T. Huber, Evelyne Keitel and Gunter Süss, 107-17. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
  • Smith, Brett. 2009. “Imagining Being Disabled Through Playing Sport: The Body and Alterity as Limits to Imagining Others’ Lives.” In Ethics, Disability and Sports, edited by Ejgil Jespersen and Mike J. McNamee, 56-71. New York: Routledge.
  • Sontag, Susan. 1978. On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Stiker, Henri-Jacques. (1999) 2009. A History of Disability. Michigan: U of Michigan P.
  • Watkiss, Joanne. 2007. “Ghosts in the Head: Mourning, Memory and Derridean ‘Trace’ in John Banville’s The Sea.” The Irish Journal of Gothic and Horror Studies 2. http://irishgothichorrorjournal.homestead.com/theseabanville.html.
  • Wehrs, Donald R. 2013. Levinas and Twentieth-Century Literature: Ethics and the Reconstitution of Subjectivity. Newark: U of Delaware P.
  • Zamorano Llena, Carmen. 2010. “‘The Figures of the Far Past Come Back at the End’: Unmasking the Desired Self through Reminiscence in Late Adulthood in John Banville’s The Sea.” In Flaming Embers: Literary Testimonies on Ageing and Desire, edited by Nela Bereu Ramos, 87-112. Bern: Peter Lang