Creative Coding and Intercultural Projects in Higher Educationa Case Study in Three Universities

  1. José-Manuel Sáez López 1
  2. Yoshiro Miyata 2
  3. Mª Concepción Domínguez-Garrido 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Chukyo University
    info

    Chukyo University

    Nagoya, Japón

    ROR https://ror.org/04ajrmg05

Revista:
RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1138-2783

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: Juegos digitales y gamificación aplicados en el ámbito de la educación

Volumen: 19

Número: 2

Páginas: 145-165

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/RIED.19.2.15796 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

Resumen

El presente estudio analiza conceptos, actitudes y prácticas de113 alumnos de tres importantes universidades de diferentes países (Japón, México y España) en relación al proceso de codificación para crear presentaciones multimedia en un contexto intercultural. El proyecto está enmarcado en dos grupos de investigación, y ha sido desarrollado para mejorar habilidades de codificación en presentaciones multimedia interculturales. Se aplica una prueba t de Student, un cuestionario mixto con un diseño pretest-postest, una prueba de Wilcoxon y entrevistas a los alumnos, haciendo uso de triangulación de datos. Los resultados muestran que el fomento de actividades multimedia y la interacción intercultural utilizando herramientas de codificación y la comunicación en una universidad tiene varias ventajas con respecto a las competencias TIC. La investigación demostró estadísticamente una eficacia significativa en cuanto a la capacidad de los estudiantes para comprender el manejo y uso de contenidos multimedia a través de programación por bloques. Aunque hay alguna limitación relacionada con el lenguaje de programación Scratch, los estudiantes destacaron que Scratch es fácil de usar, divertido y perfecto para presentaciones y animaciones.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ADEC Guiding Principles for Distance Learning and Teaching (1999). American distance education consortium. Retrieved from http://www.adec.edu/admin/papers/distanceteaching_principles.html
  • Anastasiades, P. S., Filippousis, G., Karvunis, L., Siakas, S., Tomazinakis, A., Giza, P., & Mastoraki, H. (2010). Interactive videoconferencing for collaborative learning at a distance in the school of 21st century: A case study in elementary schools in Greece. Computers in Education, 54(2), 321-339.
  • Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41, 16-25.
  • Anderson, T. (2005). Design-based research and its application to a call centre innovation in distance education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(2), 69-83. Retrieved from http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8080/dspace/bitstream/2149/741/1/design_based_research.pdf
  • Ausubel, D. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48, 251-257.
  • Barab, S., & Squire, B. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. Retrieved from http://website.education.wisc.edu/kdsquire/manuscripts/jls-barab-squire-design.pdf
  • Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). Using artifact-based interviews to study the development of computational thinking in interactive media design. American Educational Research Association meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdf
  • Brennan, K. (2012): Best of both worlds: Issues of structure and agency in computational creation, in and out of school. (Doctoral Dissertation). MIT. Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/files/dissertation/Brennan_Dissertation.pdf
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
  • Bruner, J. (1966).Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London and New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
  • Dede, C., Ketelhut, D., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19.
  • Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education, 47(3), 298–315.
  • Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Gerstein, R. (2000). Videoconferencing in the classroom: Special projects toward cultural understanding. Computers in the Schools, 16(3/4), 177–186.
  • Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1988). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1977). Approaches to the study of visual literacy: A brief survey for media personnel. Pennsylvania Media Review, 11, 15-18.
  • Knipe, D., & Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 301–311.
  • López-Escribano, C., & Sánchez-Montoya, R. (2012). Scratch y necesidades educativas especiales: Programación para todos. RED, Revista de Educación a Distancia, 34.
  • Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmong, E. (2010). The Scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), 1-15.
  • Maxcy, S. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 51–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mingfong, J., Yam San, C., & Ek Ming, T. (2010). Unpacking the design process in design-based research. Wong, S.L., Kong, S. C & Yu, F. Y. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2, 543-547). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
  • Miyata, Y., Ueshiba, T., & Harada, Y. (2012). Cultivating constructive mindset in world museum, collaboration across cultures and generations, paper presented to the Constructionism 2012, Athens, Greece.
  • Näsström, G. (2009). Interpretation of standards with Bloom’s revised taxonomy: A comparison of teachers and assessment experts. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32, 39-51.
  • Omatsey, J. N. (1999). Teaching through tele-conferencing. Some curriculum challenges. College Student Journal, 33(3), 346–353.
  • Owen, J. M., & Rogers, P. J. (1999). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches (International ed.). London, England: Sage.
  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books. Retrieved from https://creative-computing.appspot.com/assets/lib/Papert-1993.pdf
  • Reeves, T. (2000). Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “design experiments” and other developmental strategies. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Retrieved from http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/~treeves/AERA2000Reeves.pdf
  • Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Hernández, A. M., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009) Scratch: Programming for all, Communications of the ACM, 52(11). Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/Scratch-CACM-final.pdf
  • Sáez, Leo, L., & Miyata (2013). Uso de edmodo en proyectos colaborativos internacionales en educación primaria. Edutec, revista electrónica de tecnología educativa, 43, 1-17. Retrieved from http://edutec.rediris.es/revelec2/revelec43/edmodo_proyectos_colaborativos_internacionales_primaria.htm
  • Sáez-López, J.M., Román-González, M. y Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school. A two year case study using scratch in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129-141 .http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
  • Stewart, M., & Vallance, M. (2008). The impact of synchronous inter-networked teacher training in information and communication technology integration. Computers & Education, 51, 34–5.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Chapter 6 Interaction between learning and development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 1, 139–145.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet