La cooperación en proyectos tecnológicos, ¿qué queda por hacer?Una aproximación desde el enfoque estratégico

  1. Nieves Arranz 1
  2. Juan Carlos Fernández de Arroyabe 2
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 University of Essex
    info

    University of Essex

    Colchester, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/02nkf1q06

Revista:
Papeles de economía española
  1. Moral Rincón, María José (coord.)

ISSN: 0210-9107

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: Competitividad en los mercados internacionales: búsqueda de ventajas

Número: 150

Páginas: 88-113

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Papeles de economía española

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abramovsky, L.; Kremp, E.; López, A.; Schmidt, T., y Simpson, H. (2009), «Understanding cooperative innovative activity: Evidence from four European countries», Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18: 243-265.
  • Archibugi, D., y Coco, A. (2004), «International partnerships for knowledge in business academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA», Technovation, 24: 517- 528.
  • Arora, A . , y Gambardella , A . ( 1 9 9 0 ) , «Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology», The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38: 361-379.
  • Arranz, N., y Arroyabe, J. C. (2008), «The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms», Technovation, 28: 88-100.
  • Barajas, A.; Huergo, E., y Moreno, l.(2012), «Measuring the economic impact of international R&D cooperation: the case of RJV supported by the EU Framework Programme», Journal of Technology Transfer, 37: 917-942.
  • Barajas, A.; Huergo, E., y Moreno, l. (2016), «SMEs performance and public support for international RJVs», Journal of Small Business Management, DOI: 10.1111/jsbm.12221.
  • Bayona-Sáez, C., y García-Marco, T. (2010), «Assessing the effectiveness of the Eureka Program», Research Policy, 39: 1375-1386.
  • Bayona-Sáez, C.; Garcia-Marco, T., y Huerta, E. (2001), «Firms’ motivations for coopera- tive R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms», Research Policy, 30: 1289-1307.
  • Branstetter, l. G., y Sakakibara, M. (2002), «When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data», The American Economic Review, 92: 143-159.
  • Busom, I., y Fenández-Ribas, A. (2008), «The impact of firm participation in R&D pro-grammes on R&D partnerships», Research Policy, 37: 240-257.
  • Cassiman, B., y Veugelers, R. (1998), «R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence», Universitat Pompeu Fabra Economics WP 328.
  • Cassiman, B., y Veugelers, R. (2002), «R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium», The American Economic Review, 92: 1169-1184.
  • Castro, L.M.; Montoro-Sánchez, A., y Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. (2011), «Innovation in services industries: current and future trends», The Service Industries Journal, 31: 7-20.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006), Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business Press, Massachusetts.
  • Chun, H., y Mun, S. (2012), «Determinants of R&D cooperation in small and medium- sized enterprises», Small Business Eco- nomics, 39: 419-436.
  • Cis (2012), Community Innovation Survey, Eurostat, UE, http://ec.europa.eu/euros- tat/web/microdata/community-innova-tion-survey
  • Coad, A.; Segarra, A., y Teruel, M. (2016), «Innovation and firm growth: does firm age play a role?», Research Policy, 45: 387-400.
  • Cotec (2014), Informe Cotec 2014. Tecnología e Innovación, Fundación COTEC para la Innovación Tecnológica, Madrid.
  • Ddas, T. K., y Ten, B. S. (2000), «A resource based theory of strategic alliances», Journal of Management, 26: 31-61.
  • Doz, y. l.; olK, p. M., y ring, p. s. (2000), «Formation processes of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead?», Strategic Management Journal, 21: 239-266.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., y Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996), «Resource-based view of strategic al- liance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms.» Organi- zation Science 7: 136-150.
  • Fernández, Z., y Nieto, M. J. (2006), «Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs», Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 340-351.
  • Fritsch, M., y Lukas, r. (2001), «Who cooperates on R&D?», Research Policy, 30: 297-312.
  • García Canal, E. (1995), «Acuerdos de cooperación en I+D en España: un análisis empírico», Revista Asturiana de Economía, 4: 195-207.
  • Grant, R., y Bade-Fuller, C. A. (2004), «A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances», Journal of Management Studies, 41: 61-84.
  • Grewal, R.; Lilien, G. L., y Mallapragada, G. (2006), «Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems», Management Science, 52: 1043-1056.
  • Gutiérrez-García, A.; Vega-Jurado, J., y Fernández de Lucio (2010), «Cooperación con agentes científicos y desempeño innovador», en Sanz, L. y Cruz, L. (coord.): Análisis sobre ciencia e innovación en España, Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT): 532-564.
  • HagEdoorn, J. (1993),. «Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partne- ring: interorganizational modes of coope- ration and sectoral differences», Strategic Management Journal, 14: 371-385.
  • Hagedoorn, J.; Link, A., y Vonortas, N. (2000), «Research partnerships», Research Policy, 29: 567-586.
  • Hipp, C., y Grupp, H. (2005), «Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement con- cepts and typologies», Research Policy, 34: 517-535.
  • Hitt, M. A.; Hoskisson, R. E.; Ireland, R. D., y Harrison, J. S. (1991), «Effects of acqui- sitions on R&D inputs and outputs», Academy of Management Journal, 34: 693-706.
  • Huergo, E., y Redrado, P. (2007), «Las actividades tecnológicas en la industria española y el contexto europeo», Papeles de Economía Española, 112: 106-120.
  • Koka, B. R., y Prescott, J. E. (2002), «Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view», Strategic Management Journal, 23: 795-816.
  • Lavie, D. (2006), «The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view», Academy of Management Review, 31: 638-658.
  • Leiponen, A. (2005), «Organisation of knowledge and innovation: The case of Finnish business services», Industry and Innovation, 12: 185-203.
  • López, A. (2008), «Determinants of R&D cooperation: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms», International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26: 113-136.
  • Miotti, l., y Sachwald, F. (2003), «Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis», Research policy, 32: 1481-1499.
  • Miyata, y. (1996), «An economic analysis of cooperative R&D in the United States», Technovation, 16: 123-131.
  • Moran, p. (2005), «Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance», Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1129-1151.
  • Mytelka, L. K. (1991), «States, strategic alliances and international oligopolies: the European ESPRIT Programme», en Mytelka, L.K. (Ed.): Strategic Partnerships, Pinter Publishers, London.
  • Nieto, M. J., y Santamaría, L. (2010), «Technological collaboration: Bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms», Journal of Small Business Management, 48: 46-69.
  • OECD (1996), «Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification», STI Working Papers,1996/2, OCDE.
  • Park, N. K.; Mezias, J. M., y Song, J. A. (2004), «Resource-based view of strategic alliances and firm value in the electronic marketplace», Journal of Management, 30: 7-27.
  • Pitec (2012), Panel de Innovación Tecnológica (PITEC), Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, http://www.fecyt.es/es/publicacion/pitec-2010-lafinanciacion-de-la-innovacion-de-lasempresas
  • Quintana-García, C., y Benavides-Velasco, C. (2004), «Cooperation, competition and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms», Technovation, 24: 927-938.
  • Revilla, E.; Sarkis, J., y Acosta, J. (2005), «Towards knowledge management and learning taxonomy for research joint ventures», Technovation, 25: 1307-1316.
  • Segarra, A., y Teruel, M. (2014), «High-Growth Firms and innovation: an empirical analysis for Spanish firms», Small Business Economics, 43: 805-821.
  • Shaw, B. (1994), «User-supplier links and innovation», en Dodgson, M. y Rothwell, R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
  • Takayama, M.; Watanabe, W., y Griffy-Brown, Ch. (2002), «Alliance strategy as a competitive strategy for successively creative new product development: the proof of the co-evolution of creativity an efficiency in the Japanese pharmaceutical industry», Technovation, 22: 607-623.
  • Tether, B.S. (2002), «Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis», Research Policy, 31: 947-967.
  • Triguero, Á., y Córcoles, D. (2013), «Understanding innovation: An analysis of persistence for Spanish manufacturing firms», Research Policy, 42: 340-352.
  • Verspagen, B., y Duysters, G. (2004), «The small worlds of strategic technology alliances», Technovation, 24: 563-571.
  • Vuola, O., y Hameri, A. (2006), «Mutually benefiting joint innovation process between industry and big-science», Technovation, 26: 3-12.
  • Williamson, O.E. (2002), «The Theory of the firm as Governance Structure: From choice to contract», Economic Perspective,16: 171-196.
  • Yasuda, H. (2005), «Formation of strategic alliances in high-technology industries: comparative study of the resources-based theory and the transaction-cost theory», Technovation, 25: 763-770.