La relación entre la discriminación percibida y el balance afectivo en personas con discapacidad físicaEl papel mediador del dominio del entorno

  1. Fernando Molero Alonso
  2. María del Prado Silván Ferrero
  3. Cristina García Ael
  4. Itziar Fernández Sedano
  5. Claudia Tecglen García
Journal:
Acta Colombiana de Psicología

ISSN: 1909-9711,  0123-9155

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 16

Issue: 1

Pages: 35-42

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Acta Colombiana de Psicología

Abstract

There is a large body of research showing that perceived discrimination has a negative effect on physical and mental health of persons belonging to different stigmatized groups. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between perceived discrimination and affective balance in people with physical disabilities. In addition, the mediating role of a special relevant variable -the environmental mastery (Ryff, 1989a) - is analyzed in relation to people with physical disabilities as a protective factor against negative discrimination. Participants in the study were 52 people with physical disabilities. Results showed that the negative relationship between perceived discrimination and affective balance is significantly reduced by introducing environmental mastery into the equation. It was also found that the age of the participants shows a positive association both with affective balance and environmental mastery. This research shows that to the extent that people with physical disabilities feel able to choose or create favorable environments, the negative effects of stigma are reduced.

Bibliographic References

  • Baron, R, Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51. 1173-1182
  • Braddock, D, Parish, S. (2001). Handbook of Disability Studies. Sage. Thousand Oaks^eCA CA.
  • Carrasco, L. F, Martín, N, Molero, F. Conciencia de estigma y calidad de vida en personas con discapacidad física y sensorial. Revista de Psicología Social.
  • Los jóvenes con discapacidad en España: informe de situación 2010. Grupo Editorial Cinca, S. A.. Madrid.
  • Crocker, J, Major, B, Steele, C. (1998). The Handbook of Social Psychology. 4. McGraw-Hill. Boston.
  • Díaz, D, Rodríguez-Carvajal, R, Blanco, A, Moreno-Jiménez, B, Gallardo, I, Valle, C, van Dierendonck, D. (2006). Adaptación española de las escalas de bienestar psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema. 18. 572-577
  • Dijker, A, Koomen, W. (2007). Stigmatization, Tolerance and Repair: An Integrative Psychological Analysis of Responses to Deviance. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs.
  • Jenaro, C, Flores, N. (2006). Necesidades en el medio rural de las personas con gran discapacidad física y sus familias: Informe de resultados 2006. PREDIF. Madrid.
  • Jiménez, A, Huete, A. (2002). La discriminación por motivos de discapacidad: Análisis de las respuestas recibidas al cuestionario sobre discriminación por motivos de discapacidad promovido por el CERMI estatal.
  • Katz, I. (1981). Stigma: A social psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale^eNJ NJ.
  • Maya, I, García, M, Santolaya, F. (2007). Estrategias de intervención psicosocial: casos prácticos. Pirámide. Madrid.
  • Mehnert, T, Krauss, H, Nadler, R, Boyd, M. (1990). Correlates of life satisfaction in those with disabling conditions. Rehabilitation Psychology. 35. 21-39
  • Molero, F, Recio, P, García-Ael, C, Fuster, M. J, Sanjuán, P. (2012). Measuring dimensions of perceived discrimination in five stigmatized groups. Social Indicators Research.
  • Pascoe, E.A, Smart Richman, L. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. 135. 531-554
  • (2008). Necesidades en el medio urbano de las personas con gran discapacidad física y sus familias.
  • Quiles, M. N, Morera, M. D. (2008). Método, teoría e investigación en psicología social. Pearson. Madrid.
  • Ryan, M. R, Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology. 52. 141-166
  • Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it?: Explorations of the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57. 1069-1081
  • Ryff, C. (1989). Beyond Ponce de León and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful aging. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 12. 35-55
  • Ryff, C. D, Keyes, C. L M, Hughes, D. L. (2003). Status inequalities, perceived discrimination and eudaimonic well-being: Do the challenges of minority life hone purpose and growth?. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 44. 275-291
  • Sandín, B, Chorot, P, Lostao, L, Joiner, T. E, Santed, M. A, Valiente, R. M. (1999). Escala panas de afecto positive y negative: validación factorial y convergencia transcultural. Psicothema. 11. 37-51
  • Sanjuán, P. (2011). Affect balance as mediating variable between effective psychological functioning and satisfaction with life. Journal of Happiness Studies. 12. 373-384
  • Sanjuán, P, Ruiz, M.A, Pérez, A. (2011). Life satisfaction and positive adjustment as predictors of emotional distress in men with coronary heart disease. Journal of Happiness Studies. 12. 1035-1047
  • Schimmack, U, Diener, E. (1997). Affect intensity: Separating intensity and frequency in repeatedly measured affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 73. 1313-1329
  • Schulz, R, Decker, S. (1985). Long-term adjustment to physical disability: The role of social support, perceived control, and self-blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 48. 1162-1172
  • Silván-Ferrero, M. P. (2008). Método, teoría e investigación en psicología social. Pearson. Madrid.
  • Silván-Ferrero, M.P, Bustillos, A. (2009). Justificación de la desigualdad y actitudes hacia la discapacidad: ¿Oposición o dominancia?. Revista de Psicología Social. 24. 41-51
  • Sobel, M.E. (1982). Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco.
  • Uppal, S. (2006). Impact of the timing, type and severity of disability on the subjective wellbeing of individuals with disabilities. Social Science and Medicine. 63. 525-539
  • Watson, D, Clark, L.A, Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect The PANAS scales.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54. 1063-1070
Data source: Dialnet