Dimensionality and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish version of the Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Scale (MMDS-S)

  1. Rubio-Garay, Fernando 1
  2. Amor, Pedro J.
  3. Carrasco, Miguel A.
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Revista:
Revista de psicopatología y psicología clínica

ISSN: 1136-5420

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 22

Número: 1

Páginas: 43-54

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/RPPC.VOL.22.NUM.1.2017.16014 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicopatología y psicología clínica

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Este trabajo analiza las dimensiones y propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la Escala de Mecanismos de Desconexión Moral (MMDS). Este instrumento fue diseñado para evaluar el constructo desconexión moral. Se evaluaron 513 estudiantes (58.3% mujeres; rango de 15-25 años). El análisis factorial confirmatorio mostró cuatro modelos con un adecuado ajuste y una estructura factorial de primer orden (Modelo 1), y una estructura de segundo orden (Modelos 2, 3 y 4). El Modelo 4 ofreció el mejor ajuste [χ2 = 19.35; RMSEA = .016; GFI = .99; AGFI = .98; ECVI = .11; CAIC = 156.92], representado por un factor general de segundo orden (desconexión moral) y tres de primer orden: desconexión por despersonalización; desconexión por irresponsabilidad; y desconexión por racionalización. Se encontraron relaciones significativas entre la desconexión moral, la agresión y la empatía. El instrumento es válido y fiable para evaluar la desconexión moral en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Andreu, J. M., Peña, M. E., & Graña, J. L. (2002). Adaptación psicométrica de la versión española del Cuestionario de Agresión. Psicothema, 14, 476-482.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27-46.
  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personal and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193209.
  • Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101119.
  • Bandura, A. (2004). The role of selective moral disengagement in terrorism and counterterrorism. In F. M. Mogahaddam & A. J. Marsella (Ed.), Understanding terrorism: Psychological roots, consequences and interventions (pp. 121-250). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-374.
  • Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., & Regalia, C. (2001). Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 125-135.
  • Bandura, A., Underwood, B., & Fromson, M. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 253-269
  • Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
  • Carrasco, M. A., & Rubio-Garay, F. (2011, febrero). Desconexión moral y violencia en el noviazgo: un estudio con adolescentes y jóvenes [Moral disengagement and dating violence: a study with youths and adolescents] Poster presentation at the I Forum of New Psychology Investigators at the UNED (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia), Madrid, Spain.
  • Davis, M.H. (1980). A multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
  • Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374-391.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. Merenda, & C. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluation model fi t. In R. H. Hoyle (Eds), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp.76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., & Moilanen, K. L. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 38, 197-209.
  • Jöreskog K. G., & Sörbom D. (1996a). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientifi c Software International.
  • Jöreskog K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996b). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientifi c Software International.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • Lee, J., & Paek, I. (2014). In Search of the Optimal Number of Response Categories in a Rating Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 663-673.
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2007). FACTOR: A computer program to fi t the exploratory factor analysis model. Tarragona, Spain: University Rovira y Virgili.
  • Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4(2), 73-79.
  • McAlister, A. L., Bandura, A., & Owen, S. V. (2006). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in support of military force: The impact of September 11. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 141-166.
  • Mestre, V., Frías, M. D., & Samper, P. (2004). La medida de la empatía: Análisis del Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Psicothema, 16, 255-260.
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Obermann, M. L. (2011a). Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10, 239257.
  • Obermann, M. L. (2011b). Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 133-144.
  • Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., & Cole, E. (2013). High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 3-7.
  • Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impacts on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development 79, 1288-1309.
  • Pelton, J., Gound, M., Forehand, R., & Brody, G. (2004). The Moral Disengagement Scale: Extension with an American minority sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 31-39.
  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan.
  • Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81-94.
  • Preston, C.C., & Colman, A.M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1-15.
  • Rubio-Garay, F., Carrasco, M. A., & García-Rodríguez, B. (in press). Moral disengagement and violence in adolescent and young dating relationships: A correlational study. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica.
  • South, C. R., & Wood, J. (2006). Bullying in Prisons: The Importance of Perceived Social Status, Prisonization, and Moral Disengagement. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 490-501.
  • Vollum, S., & Buffi ngton-Vollum, J. (2010). An examination of social-psychological factors and support for the death penalty: Attribution, moral disengagement, and the value-expressive function of attitudes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 15-36.
  • White, J, Bandura, A., & Bero, L. A. (2009). Moral disengagement in the corporate world. Accountability in Research, 16, 41-74.
  • Zuñeda, A., Llamazares, A., Marañón, D., & Vázquez, G. (2016). Características individuales y familiares de los adolescentes en violencia fi lio-parental: la agresividad física, la cohesión familiar y el conflicto interparental como variables explicativas. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 21, 2133.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet