Sensores, programación y dispositivos en sesiones de Educación Artística. Un caso en el contexto de Educación Primaria

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41, 16–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Ausubel, D. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48, 251–257. doi:10.3102/00346543048002251[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Baytak, A., & Land, S. M. (2011). An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 765–782. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9184-z[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Berry, M. (2013). Computing in the national curriculum: A guide for primary teachers. Retrieved from: http://www.computingatschool.org.uk/data/uploads/CASPrimaryComputing.pdf [Google Scholar]
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, handbook 1 cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay. [Google Scholar]
• Brennan, K. (2012). Best of Both Worlds: Issues of Structure and Agency in Computational Creation, in and out of School. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. [Google Scholar]
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). Using artifact-based interviews to study the development of computational thinking in interactive media design. American Educational Research Association meeting, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdf [Google Scholar]
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032[Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Bruckman, A. (2006). Learning in online communities. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 461–472). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial. [Google Scholar]
• European Parliament and Council. (2006). Key competences for lifelong learning – A European framework. Official Journal of the European Union on 30 December 2006/L394. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_394/l_39420061230en00100018.pdf [Google Scholar]
• Fu, F.-L., Wu, Y.-L., & Ho, H.-C. (2009). An investigation of coopetitive pedagogic design for knowledge creation in web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53, 550–562. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.004[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. [Google Scholar]
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (1995). SPSS/PC+Step by: A simple guide and reference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. [Google Scholar]
• Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1988). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Madrid: Ediciones Morata. [Google Scholar]
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
• Hiltz, S. R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., & Turoff, M. (2000). Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 103–125. [Google Scholar]
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 K-12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2014-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf [Google Scholar]
• Jonassen, D. H. (1977). Approaches to the study of visual literacy: A brief survey for media personnel. Pennsylvania Media Review, 11, 15–18. [Google Scholar]
• Kolodner, J., Camp, P., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., … Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495–547. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kwon, D. Y., Kim, H. S., Shim, J. K., & Lee, W. G. (2012). Algorithmic bricks: A tangible robot programming tool for elementary school students. Education, IEEE Transactions, 55, 474–479. doi:10.1109/TE.2012.2190071[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lambert, L., & Guiffre, H. (2009). Computer science outreach in an elementary school. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 24(3), 118–124. [Google Scholar]
• Laros, F. J. M., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2005). Emotions in consumer behavior: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1437–1445. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.013[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lee, Y. J. (2011). Empowering teachers to create educational software: A constructivist approach utilizing Etoys, pair programming and cognitive apprenticeship. Computers & Education, 56, 527–538. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.018[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Leman, M. (2008). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
• Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmond, E. (2010). The “Scratch” programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), 1–15. doi:10.1145/1868358[Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Maya, I., Pearson, J. N., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q. M., & Reese, G. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263–279. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.022[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Ministerio de Educación y Cultura y Deporte, MECD. (2014). Real Decreto 126/2014, de 28 de febrero, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Primaria. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2014/03/01/pdfs/BOE-A-2014-2222.pdf [Google Scholar]
• Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. New York, NY: Basic Books.[Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
• Sáez López, J. M. (2012). Valoracion de la persistencia de los obstaculos relativos al uso de las tecnologias de la informacion y la comunicacion en educacion primaria. Educatio siglo XXI: Revista de la facultad de educación, 30(1), 253–274. Retrieved from http://revistas.um.es/educatio/article/view/149231 [Google Scholar]
• Sáez-López, J. M., & Cózar, R. (in press). Programación visual por bloques en Educación Primaria: Aprendiendo y creando contenidos en Ciencias Sociales. Revista Complutense de Educación. [Google Scholar]
• Sáez López, J. M., & Miyata, Y. (2013). Integrating “Scratch” in primary education. In Scratch connecting worlds. 25-27 july. Retrieved from http://scratch2013bcn.org/node/173 [Google Scholar]
• Sáez-López, J. M., Román, M., & Vázquez, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school. A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129–141. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 1, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
• Wilson, A., & Moffat, D. C. (2010). Evaluating “Scratch” to introduce younger school children to programming. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Psychology of Programming Interest Group. Leganes: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. [Google Scholar]
• Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Clark, J., Rogers, M. P., Spradling, C., & Pais, J. (2013). What, no canoes? Lessons learned while hosting a “Scratch” summer camp. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28, 204–210. [Google Scholar]