Learning the psychology of the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon through on-line practice

  1. Marcos Ruiz 1
  2. María José Contreras 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Zeitschrift:
Open Praxis

ISSN: 2304-070X

Datum der Publikation: 2017

Ausgabe: 9

Nummer: 4

Seiten: 421-431

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5944/OPENPRAXIS.9.4.619 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Open Praxis

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Psychology undergraduates can benefit from direct experiences with laboratory procedures of psychological phenomena. However, they are not always available for students within a distance education program. The present study included students from the Spanish National Distance Education University (UNED) that were to take part in a Basic Psychology examination session. They participated in web-sessions on a tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) laboratory procedure. The aim was to study whether their performance at TOT-related items would be differentially improved. Our results support the conclusion that practicing with the TOT application was effective in improving the TOT comprehension among students. Study A showed that the performance level was higher for the TOT-practiced participants relative to the non-practiced ones. Study B showed significant group by item-type interaction. Also, there was a significant effect of group, and item-type. The results are contextualized in the psychological institutions’ mainstream effort for Psychology to be viewed as a STEM discipline by students, the political representatives, and the society.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • American Psychological Association (2013). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/undergrad/index.aspx
  • Benjamin, L.T. (2005). Setting course goals: Privileges and responsibilities in a world of ideas. Teaching of Psychology, 32(3), 146-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3203_1
  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M.A., y Bethel E.C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
  • Bonnetain, E., Boucheix, J.M., Hamet, M., & Freyaz, M. (2010). Benefits of computer screen-based simulation in cardiac arrest procedures. Medical Education, 44(7), 716-722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03708.x
  • Breckler, S.J. (2014a). Calling psychology education what it is: STEM. Monitor on Psychology, 45(7), 74.
  • Breckler, S.J. (2014b). Learning STEM, working STEM. Monitor on Psychology, 45(9), 48.
  • Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
  • Clay, R.A. (2014). Learning in a digital world. Monitor on Psychology, 45(11), 38.
  • Coll, C., Rochera, M.J. & de Gispert, I. (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers and Education, 75, 53-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.015
  • Contreras, M.J. (2010). Práctica TIAD: Documentación y programa. [TIAD practice: Documentation and software]. UNED: Plataforma aLF de Procesos Psicológicos Básicos. (Accessible only to authorized students and teachers).
  • De la Fuente, J., Martínez, J.M., Peralta F.J., & García, A.B. (2010). Percepción del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en diferentes contextos instruccionales de la Educación Superior. [Perception of the teaching-learning process and academic achievement in diverse instructional contexts of Higher Education]. Psicothema, 22, 806-812. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.es/pdf/3805.pdf
  • Dunlosky, J. & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Los Ángeles, CA: Sage.
  • Garrison, D.R., & Akyol, Z. (2009). Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9014-7
  • Gil-Gómez de Liaño, B., León, O. & Pascual-Ezama, D. (2012). Research Participation Improves Student’s Exam Performance. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 544-550.
  • González, J. (1996). El fenómeno de la ‘punta de la lengua’ y la recuperación léxica: Estudio de sus propiedades en castellano y el efecto de la frecuencia del estímulo. [The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon and lexical retrieval: A study on its properties in Spanish and the stimulus frequency effect]. Estudios de Psicología, 56, 71-96.
  • Griggs, R.A. & Bates, S.C. (2014). Topical coverage in Introductory Psychology: Textbooks versus lectures. Teaching of Psychology, 41(2), 144-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628314530347
  • Gurung, R.A.R., Hackathorn, J., Enns, C., Frantz, S., Cacioppo, J.T., Loop T., & Freeman, J.E. (2016). Strengthening Introductory Psychology: A new model for teaching the introductory course. American Psychologist, 71(2), 112-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0040012
  • Hartnett, J.L. (2013). Stats on the cheap: Using free and inexpensive internet resources to enhance the teaching of statistics and research methods. Teaching of Psychology, 40(1), 52-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628312465865
  • Homa, N., Hackathorn, J., Brown, C.M., Garczynski, A., Solomon, E.D., Tennial, R., Sanborn, U.A., & Gurung, R.A.R. (2013). An analysis of learning objectives and content coverage in Introductory Psychology syllabi. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 169-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628313487456
  • Hughes, S., Lyddy, F., & Lambe, S. (2013). Misconceptions about Psychological Science: a review. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 12(1), 20-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.20
  • Kirschner, P. & Huisman, W. (1998). “Dry laboratories” in science education; computer-based practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 665-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200605
  • Koriat, A. & Lieblich, I. (1974). What does a person in a “TOT” state know that a person in a “don’t know” state doesn’t know. Memory & Cognition, 2(4), 647-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03198134
  • Luzón, J.M. & Quintana, I. (2010). Guía Práctica de Alf: Perfil Equipo Docente. [User’s Guide for Alf: Teaching team profile]. Madrid: IUED-UNED.
  • Mayer, R. (2001). Multi-media learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moore, M. (1989). Editorial: three types of interaction. Americal Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
  • Norcross, J.C., Hailstorks, R., Aiken, L.S., Pfund, R.A., Stamm, K.E. & Christidis, P. (2016). Undergraduate study in Psychology: Curriculum and assessment. American Pychologist, 71(2), 89-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0040095
  • Pearson, M.R. & Richardson, T.A. (2013). Teaching the truth about lies to Psychology students: The speed lying task. Teaching of Psychology, 40(1), 56-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628312465866
  • Pellegrino, J.W., Chudowsky, N.J., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • Price, M. (2010). Earning a spot in science’s big tent. Monitor on Psychology, 41, 32.
  • Quellmalz, E.S., Timms, M.J., Silbergitt, M.D. & Buckley, B.C. (2012). Science assessments for all: Integrating science simulations into balanced state science assessment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 183-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.21005
  • R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
  • Ruiz, M. (2003). Procedimientos y simulaciones en psicología de la memoria [Procedures and simulations in psychology of memory]. Madrid: UNED.
  • Ruiz, M. (2004). Las caras de la memoria [The faces of memory]. Madrid: Pearson.
  • Ruiz, M. (2010). Práctica FPL: Documentación y programa. [TOT Practice: Documentation and software]. UNED (Accessible only to authorized students and teachers. Pdf document available from the authors upon request).
  • Ruiz, M. (2011). Apuntes sobre Psicología de la Memoria. [Notes on the Psychology of Memory]. (Accessible only to authorized students and teachers. Pdf document available from the authors upon request).
  • Sewell, R.D., Stevens, R.G., & Lewis, D.J (1995). Multimedia computer technology as a tool for teaching and assessment of biological science. Journal of Biological Education, 29(1), 27-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1995.9655415
  • Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744- 6570.2011.01190.x
  • Thoms, B. & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers and Education, 75, 112-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.002
  • Zhang, M. (2014). Who are interested in online science simulations? Tracking a trend of digital divide in Internet use. Computers and Education, 76, 205-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.001
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet