Role ambiguity, group cohesion and job satisfactiona Demands-Resources Model (JD-R) Study from Mexico and Spain

  1. Begoña Urien 1
  2. Amparo Osca 2
  3. Lourdes García-Salmones 3
  1. 1 Universidad Pública de Navarra
    info

    Universidad Pública de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z0cah89

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  3. 3 Universidad Europea de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Europea de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04dp46240

Journal:
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

ISSN: 0120-0534

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 49

Issue: 1-3

Pages: 137-145

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.RLP.2015.09.014 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

In line with the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) theory, this paper studies the relationship between role ambiguity (Demand) and group cohesion (Resource) to predict job satisfaction. This study was carried out at the same multinational company in Mexico and Spain (N=537), where blue-collar workers are organized in work groups. It is hypothesized that high levels of role ambiguity are related to low job satisfaction whereas positive high levels of group cohesion are related to high job satisfaction. In addition, it is posited that group cohesion could buffer the relationship between role ambiguity and job satisfaction. Results confirm the JD-R theory with regard to direct effects. Moderating effects have been found in both countries but, contrary to the hypotheses, since these strengthen the negative effect of role ambiguity on job satisfaction. These results are relevant since nowadays, organizations need to deal with increasingly higher levels of ambiguity. The results are also being commented from a cross-cultural research perspective.