Rasgos de personalidad y recursos psicológicos como predictores del bienestar emocional en adolescentes con y sin formación en escuelas de tauromaquia

  1. Pilar Sanjuán 1
  2. David Guillén 1
  3. Ana M. Pérez-García 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, España
Revista:
Revista de psicopatología y psicología clínica

ISSN: 1136-5420

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 23

Número: 1

Páginas: 1-12

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/RPPC.VOL.23.NUM.1.2018.18494 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicopatología y psicología clínica

Resumen

The main objective of this study was to analyse how being in training in bullfighting schools can affect the emotional well-being (EW), the personality and the psychological resources of adolescents. The sample consisted of 196 boys, 95 from bullfighting school group (BSG) and 101 from a control group (CG). The BSG, in relation to CG, scored significantly more on conscientiousness, agreeableness and openness to experience, as well as on self-efficacy, problem-solving (PSC) and social support coping (SSC), and EW. The EW was predicted by feeling self-efficacy and not using avoidance coping, and in the CG by being extraverted, showing conscientiousness, being low in neuroticism, feeling self-efficacy and using PSC and SSC. It discusses the psychological adaptive profile of adolescents in the BSG and the need to promote well-being in adolescence through the promotion of self-efficacy and active coping

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baessler, J., y Schwarcer, R. (1996). Evaluación de la autoeficacia: Adaptación española de la escala de Autoeficacia General. Ansiedad y Estrés, 2, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872010000500004.
  • Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 139-161. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4.
  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., y Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267.
  • Cordero, A., Pamos, A., y Seisdedos, N. (1999). Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado (NEO PI-R) e Inventario NEO Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual Profesional. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, S.A.
  • Costa, P., y McCrae, R. (1992). NEO PI-R, Professional Manual Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, Fl.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Diener, D., Sandvik, E., y Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. Social Indicators Research Series, 39, 213-231. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_10.
  • Diener, E., Lucas, R., y Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. En C. Snyder y S. Lopez (Eds.) Handbook of positive psychology, (pp. 63-73). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Feltz, D.L., Short, S., y Sullivan, P. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport: research and strategies for working with athletes, teams and coaches. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Folkman, S. (2008). The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 21, 3-14. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/10615800701740457.
  • Fox, K. R., Stathi A., McKenna J., y Davis M. G. (2007). Physical activity and mental well-being in older people participating in the Better Ageing Project. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 100, 591-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0392-0.
  • Frydenberg. E., y Lewis, R. (1993). Manual: The Adolescent Coping Scale. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • García Secades, X., Salguero, A., Molinero, O., De la Vega, R., Ruiz, R., y Márquez, S. (2015). El papel del perfil resiliente y las estrategias de afrontamiento sobre el estrés-recuperación del deportista de competición. Kronos, 14, 1-5.
  • Goñi, E., e Infante, G. (2015). Actividad físico-deportiva, autoconcepto físico y satisfacción con la vida. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 3, 199-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1989/ejep.v3i2.60.
  • Greenglass, E. R., y Fiksenbaum, L. (2009). Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being: Testing for mediation using path analysis considerations. European Psychologist, 14, 29-39.http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.29.
  • Hopwood, C.J., Donnellan, M.B., Blonigen, D.M., Krueger, R.F.,McGue, M., Iacono, W.G., y Burt. S.A. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on personality trait stability and growth during the transition to adulthood: A three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 545-556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022409.
  • Kjell, O., Nima, A., Sikstrom, S., Archer, T., y Garcia, D. (2013). Iranian and Swedish adolescents: Differences in personality traits and well-being. PeerJ, e197. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.197.
  • Lazarus, R. (2006). Emotions and interpersonal relationships:Toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 74, 9-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00368.x.
  • Lazarus, R., y Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
  • Litman, J., y Lunsford, G. (2009). Frequency of use and impact of coping strategies assessed by the COPE Inventory and their relationships to post-event health and well-being. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 982-991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105309341207.
  • Llewellyn, D.., Sánchez, X., Asghar, A., y Jones, G. (2008). Self-efficacy, risk taking and performance in rock climbing. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 75-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.001.
  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., y Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.
  • Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K., y Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111-131. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111.
  • Mayordomo-Rodríguez, T., Meléndez-Moral, J., Viguer-Segui, P., y Sales-Galán, A. (2015). Coping strategies as predictors of well-being in youth adult. Social Indicators Research, 122, 479-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0689-4.
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud (2013). The European health report 2012: Charting the way to well-being. Copenague: WHO. Organización Mundial de la Salud (2016). Adolescents’ mental well-being. Copenague: WHO.
  • Palacios, J. (2010). Smoking-related self-efficacy and smoking intention in young people: Factorial validity and structural association. Adicciones, 22, 325-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.20882/ adicciones.174.
  • Pereña, J., y Seisdedos, N. (1996). Manual: ACS. Escalas de Afrontamiento para Adolescentes. Madrid: TEA.
  • Pérez-García, A.M. (2011). Personalidad y enfermedad. En J. Bermúdez, A.M. Pérez-García, J.A. Ruiz, P. Sanjuán y B. Rueda, Psicología de la personalidad (pp. 635-700). Madrid: UNED.
  • Pinto, M., y Vásquez, N. (2013). Ansiedad estado precompetitiva y estrategias de afrontamiento: Su relación con el rendimiento en una muestra argentina de jugadores amateurs de golf. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 22, 47-52.
  • Putwain, D., Sander, P., y Larkin, D. (2013). Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours: Relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 633–650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02084.x.
  • Roberts, B., y Del Vecchio, W. (2000). The rnak-orden consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3.
  • Sandin, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T.E., Santed, M.A., y Valiente, R.M. (1999). Escalas PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: Validación factorial y convergencia transcultural. Psicothema, 11, 37-51.
  • Sanjuan, P., y Ávila, M. (2016). Afrontamiento y motivación como predictores del bienestar subjetivo y psicológico. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 21, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.21.num.1.2016.15401.
  • Sanjuán, P., García-Zamora, C., Magallares, A., Arranz, H., y Castro, A. (2017). La Escala de Encuentro de Beneficio para pacientes cardiacos. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 22, 9-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.22.num.1.2017.16998.
  • Sanjuán, P., Pérez-García, A.M., y Bermúdez, J. (2000). Escala de autoeficacia general: Datos psicométricos preliminares de la adaptación para población española. Psicothema, 12, 509-513.
  • Skinner, E., Pitzer, J., y Steele, J. (2013).Coping as part of motivational resilience in school: A multidimensional measure of families, allocations, and profiles of academic coping. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 803–835. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164413485241.
  • Steel, P., Schmidt, J., y Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138
  • Terracciano, A., McCrae, R., y Costa, P. (2010). Intra-individual change in personality stability and age. Journal of Research in Personality 44, 31-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.006.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L.A., y Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect. The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
  • Weinberg, R., y Gould, D. (2010). Fundamentos de Psicología del Deporte y del Ejercicio Físico. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana.
  • Yeung, N., y Lu, Q. (2014). Affect as a mediator between self-efficacy and quality of life among Chinese cancer survivors in China. European Journal of Cancer Care, 23, 149-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12123.
  • Ze-Wei, M., Wei-Nan, Z., y Kai-Yin, Y. (2015). Gender differences in Chinese adolescents subjective well-being: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Psychological Reports, 116, 311-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/17.07.PR0.116k15w2.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet