Wheel running induced by intermittent food schedules

  1. Gutiérrez-Ferre, Valeria E.
  2. Pellón, Ricardo
Revista:
Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

ISSN: 1576-8597

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 40

Número: 2

Páginas: 46-61

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.2478/PSICOLJ-2019-0004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Sixteen naïve male Wistar rats were exposed to intermittent food delivery to measure the development of schedule-induced wheel running, using fixed time (FT) 30, 60, 120, 240 and 480 s schedules, counterbalanced across animals according to a Latin square design (except under the FT 480 s, which was always presented last to complete the data set). Rats were also exposed to a massed-food control condition. Wheel running was induced in the range of 30-240 s with a gradation as a function of inter-food interval (IFI) length. The temporal distribution of wheel turns was generally presented in the form of an inverted U-shaped as IFIs progressed, showing maximum responding during the first portion of the interval. The introduction of massed-food resulted in an immediate reduction in wheel running. These results support the notion that wheel running can be schedule-induced and categorized into the so-called adjunctive behaviors. These data indicate that IFI length affects the development of schedule-induced wheel running and that the rate of wheel running is maintained by intermittent reinforcement, which are common characteristics of schedule-induced behaviors. Likewise, this idea is supported by the occurrence of a similar temporal pattern to that found with other adjunctive behaviors, such as schedule-induced polydipsia, with its maximum manifestation occurring between the beginning and middle of IFIs.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Acknowledments: Research and preparation of this manuscript were supported by grants PSI2011-29399, PSI2016-80082-P and BED-2012-057667 from Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, Spanish Government.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Cook P. & Singer G. (1976). Effects of stimulus displacement in adjunctive behavior. Physiology & Behavior16 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(76)90196-7
  • Bond N. W. (1973). Schedule-induced polydipsia as a function of the consummatory rate. The Psychological Record23 377-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394181
  • Brown T. G. & Flory R. K. (1972). Schedule-induced escape from fixed-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 17 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1972.17-395
  • Falk J. L. (1961). Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermittent food schedule. Science133 195-196. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3447.195
  • Falk J. L. (1966). Schedule-induced polydipsia as a function of fixed interval length. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 9 37-39. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1966.9-37
  • Falk J. L. (1967). Control of schedule-induced polydipsia: Type size and spacing of meals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior10 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1967.10-199
  • Falk J. L. (1971). The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. Physiology & Behavior6 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(71)90209-5
  • Falk J. L. (1977). The origin and functions of adjunctive behavior Animal Learning & Behavior 5 325-335. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209574
  • Flory R. K. (1971). The control of schedule-induced polydipsia: Frequency and magnitude of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation2 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(71)90022-1
  • Hawkins T. D. Schrot J. F. Githens S. H. & Everett P. B. (1972). Schedule-induced polydipsia: An analysis of water and alcohol ingestion. In R. M. Gilbert & J. D. Keehn (Eds.) Schedule effects: Drugs drinking and aggression (pp. 95-128). Toronto Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Íbias J. & Pellón R. (2011). Schedule-induced polydipsia in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat and its relation to impulsive behaviour. Behavioural Brain Research223 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.017
  • Levitsky D. & Collier G. (1968). Schedule-induced wheel running. Physiology & Behavior 3 571-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(68)90015-2
  • Looney T. A. & Cohen P. S. (1982). Aggression induced by intermittent positive reinforcement Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 6 15-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(82)90004-5
  • Mendelson J. & D. Chillag. (1970). Schedule-induced air-licking in rats. Physiology & Behavior 5 535-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(70)90263-5
  • Pellón R. (1990). Polidipsia inducida por programa: I. Definición y marco conceptual [Schedule-induced polydipsia: I. Definition and conceptual framework] Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada43 313-326.
  • Pellón R. (1992). Polidipsia inducida por programa: II. Variables motivacionales [Schedule-induced polydipsia: II. Motivational variables] Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada45 251-265.
  • Pellón R. (2012). On relative measures and models. European Journal of Behavior Analysis13 239- 242. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2012.11434432
  • Penney J. & Schull J. (1977). Functional differentiation of adjunctive drinking and wheel running. Animal Learning & Behavior5272-280. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209239
  • Pierce W. D. Belke T. W. & Harris A. F. (2018). Instrumental lever pressing for wheel running is a bitonic function of wheel revolutions per reinforcement: Effects of constraint and automatic reinforcement. Learning and Motivation64 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2018.07.001
  • Rayfield F. Segal M. & Goldiamond I. (1982). Schedule-induced defecation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior38 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.38-19
  • Riley A. L. Peele D. B. Richard K. & Kulkosky P. J. (1981). The interaction of conditioned taste aversions and schedule-induced polydipsia: Availability of alternative behaviors. Animal Learning & Behavior 9 488-492. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199597
  • Riley A. L. Wetherington C. L. Delamater A. R. Peele D. B. & Dacanay R. J. (1985). The effects of variations in the interpellet interval on wheel running in the rat. Animal Learning & Behavior13 201–206. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199274
  • Roper T.J. (1978). Diversity and substitutability of adjunctive activities under fixed-interval schedules of food reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior30 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1978.30-83
  • Roper T. J. (1980). Changes in rate of schedule-induced behaviour in rats as a function of fixed-interval schedule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology32 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248241
  • Roper T. J. (1981). What is meant by the term "schedule-induced" and how general is schedule induction? Animal Learning & Behavior 9 433-440. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209773
  • Roper T. J. & Crossland G. (1982). Schedule-induced wood-chewing in rats and its dependence on body weight. Animal Learning & Behavior 10 65-71. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212048
  • Roper T. J. & Posadas-Andrews A. (1981). Are schedule-induced drinking and displacement activities causally related? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology33(B) 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400821
  • Segal E.F. (1969). The interaction of psychogenic polydipsia with wheel running in rats. Psychonomic Science14 141-144. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332752
  • Staddon J. E. R. (1977). Schedule-induced behavior. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.) Handbook of operant behavior (pp.125-152). Englewood Cliffs New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Staddon J. E. R. & Ayres S. L. (1975). Sequential and temporal properties of behavior induced by a schedule of periodic food delivery. Behavior 54 26-49. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853975X00317
  • Staddon J. E. R. & Simmelhag V. L. (1971). The "superstitious" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review 78 3-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0030305
  • Timberlake W. Wahl G. & King D. (1982). Stimulus and response contingencies in the misbehavior of rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes8 62–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.8.1.62
  • Villareal J. (April 1967). Schedule-induced pica. Paper read at Eastern Psychological Association Boston.
  • White J. M. (1985). Schedule-induced wheel-running: Effects of exposure to the schedule. Physiology and Behavior34 119-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(85)90088-5
  • Wetherington C. L. (1982). Is adjunctive behavior a third class of behavior? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews6 329-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(82)90045-8
  • Wetherington C. L. Brownstein A. J. & Shull R. L. (1977). Schedule-induced running and chamber size. The Psychological Record 27 703-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394493
  • Wetherington C. L. & Riley A. L. (1986). Schedule induced polydipsia: Interactions with wheel running. Animal Learning & Behavior14 416-420. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200088
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet