Mobility as a function of environmental conditions and sociodemographic differentiationThe case of gender inequality in the Lisbon Metropolitan Are

  1. Luis Camarero 2
  2. Renato Miguel Carmo 1
  3. Sofía Santos 1
  1. 1 Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
    info

    Instituto Universitário de Lisboa

    Lisboa, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/014837179

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Revista:
Revista de estudios regionales

ISSN: 0213-7585

Año de publicación: 2020

Número: 117

Páginas: 145-172

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de estudios regionales

Resumen

Las características sociales y las propias condiciones del lugar condicionan la movilidad espacial. El trabajo analiza en qué medida las variables socioambientales modulan las formas de movilidad en distintos contextos de desigualdad. En primer lugar, se aborda el concepto de desigualdades de movilidad en el territorio sobre el caso del Área Metropolitana de Lisboa (LMA). En segundo lugar, se establecen indicadores para medir la motilidad ambiental y se analiza mediante el análisis de regresión logística su relación con varios tipos de desigualdad social. Para ello se emplea una amplia encuesta representativa a los habitantes de LMA. Por último, se aborda la cuestión de la interacción y acumulación de desigualdades en el contexto de las condiciones de movilidad y se examina cómo los entornos locales pueden aumentar la brecha de género.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This work was developed within the project “Ways of local sustainability: mobility, social capital and inequality”, project financed by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (PTDC/ATP-EUR/5023/2012). The project is incorporated into the IsoRural Network of Excellence (CSO2016-61728-REDT).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ADEY, P. (2006): “If mobility is everything then it is nothing: towards a relational politics of (in)mobilities”. Mobilities, No. 1, pp. 75–94.
  • ASCHER, F. (2010): Novos Princípios do Urbanismo seguido de Novos Compromissos Urbanos. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.
  • BARROSO, M. (2013): Qualidade de vida profissional em contextos organizacionais no Norte e Sul da Europa. Dissertação de Doutoramento em Sociologia, ISCTE-IUL, Portugal. http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7444
  • BIHR, A. & PFEFFERKORN, R. (2008): Le système des inégalités. París: La Découverte.
  • CAMARERO, L., CRUZ, F., OLIVA, J. (2014): “Rural sustainability, inter-generational support and mobility”. European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 734-749.
  • CAMARERO, L. & OLIVA, J. (2008): “The social face of urban mobility in Spain”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, No. 32, pp. 344-362.
  • CANTANTE, F. (2015): “Desigualdades de género no topo das desigualdades salariais em Portugal”. In CARMO, R. & Costa, A. (Eds.) Desigualdades em Questão: Análises e Problemáticas, Lisboa: Mundos Sociais, pp. 109-121.
  • CARMO, R., SANTOS, S., FERREIRA, D. (2017): “Unequal mobilities’ in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area: daily travel choices and private car use”. Finisterra - Revista Portuguesa de Geografia, Vol. LII, No. 106, pp. 29 -48.
  • CARMO, R. & CARVALHO, M. (2013): “Multiple disparities: earning inequalitites in Lisbon. Landscape and Geodiversity”. Studies of integrated geography, No. 1, pp. 36-46.
  • CASS, N., SHOVE, E., URRY, J. (2005): “Social exclusion, mobility and access”. The Sociological Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 539–555.
  • CATTAN, N. (2008): “Gendering Mobility: Insights into the construction of spatial concepts”. In UTENG, T. y CRESSWELL, T. (eds.), Gendered Mobilities. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 84–97.
  • CACHADO, R., CARMO, R., FERREIRA, D. (2017): “Usos e meios de transporte na Área Metropolitana de Lisboa: uma abordagem qualitativa da mobilidade”. Análise Social, No. 223, pp. 392–415.
  • CRANE, R. (2007): “Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting”. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 298–316.
  • CRESSWELL, T. (2001): “The production of mobilities”. New Formations, No. 43, pp. 3–
  • CRESSWELL, T. & UTENG, T. (2008): “Gendered Mobilities: Towards an Holistic Understanding”. In UTENG, T. & CRESSWELL, T. (eds), Gendered Mobilities. Aldershot: Ashagte, pp.1–12.
  • DUNCAN, O. & DUNCAN, B. (1957): The Negro population of Chicago: A study of residential succession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • FLAMM, M. & KAUFMANN, V. (2006): “Operationalizing the concept of motility: A qualitative Study”. Mobilities, Vol.1, No. 2, pp. 167–189.
  • HANNAM, K., SHELLER, M., URRY, J. (2006): “Editorial: mobilities, immobilities and moorings”. Mobilities, No. 1, pp. 1–22.
  • HANSON, S. & JOHNSTON, I. (1985): “Gender differences in work-trip length: explanations and implications”. Urban Geography, No. 6, pp. 193–219.
  • HANSON, S. (2010): “Gender and mobility: new approaches for informing sustainability”. Gender, Place & Culture, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 5–23.
  • HARVEY, D. (1982): The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • INE (2001): Tipologia socioeconómica da Área Metropolitana de Lisboa – 1991. Lisbon: Instituto Nacional de Estatística
  • INE (2003): Movimentos pendulares e organização do território metropolitano: área metropolitana de Lisboa e área metropolitana do Porto: 1991/2001. Lisbon: Instituto Nacional de Estatística.
  • JENSEN, O. (2009): “Flows of Meaning, Cultures of Movements – Urban Mobility as Meaningful Everyday Life Practice”. Mobilities, No. 4, pp. 139–158.
  • LETHERBY, G. & REYNOLDS, G. (eds.) (2009): Gendered Journeys, Mobile Emotions, Farnham: Ashgate.
  • KAUFMANN, V. (2002): Re-thinking Mobility. Burlington: Ashgate.
  • KAUFMANN, V. & WIDMER, E. (2006): “Motility and family dynamics: Current issues and research agendas”. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 111–129.
  • KAUFMANN, V., BERGMAN, M., JOYE, D. (2004): “Motility: Mobility as Capital”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 745–756.
  • KWAN, M. (1999a): “Gender, the Home-work Link, and Space-time Patterns of Non-employment Activities”. Economic Geography, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 370–394.
  • KWAN, M. (1999b): “Gender and Individual Access to Urban Opportunities: A Study Using Space–Time Measures”. The Professional Geographer, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 210–227.
  • MANDERSCHEID, K. (2009a): “Integrating Space and Mobilities into the Analysis of Social Inequality”. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 7–27.
  • MANDERSCHEID, K. (2009b): “Unequal Mobilities”. In OHNMACHT, T., MAKSIM, H., BERGMAN, M. (eds.), Mobilities and Inequality. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp.27–50.
  • MANDERSCHEID, K. (2014): “Criticising the Solitary Mobile Subject: Researching Relational Mobilities and Reflecting on Mobile Methods”. Mobilities, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 188–219.
  • MERRIMAN, P. (2014): “Rethinking Mobile Methods”. Mobilities, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 167–187.
  • NETO, R., DUARTE, G., PÁEZ, A. (2015): “Gender and commuting time in São Paulo Metropolitan Region”. Urban Studies, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 298–313.
  • NUNES, J. (2011): Florestas de Cimento Armado. Os Grandes Conjuntos Residenciais e a Constituição da Metrópole de Lisboa (1955-2005). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian e Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia.
  • OHNMACHT, T., MAKSIM, H., BERGMAN, M. (eds.) (2009): Mobilities and inequality, Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • PADEIRO, M. (2012): “Conciliar os transportes e o ordenamento urbano: avanços recentes e aplicabilidade em áreas metropolitanas portuguesas”. Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios, Vol. 25, pp. 1-20.
  • PADEIRO, M. (2014): “The influence of transport infrastructures on land-use conversion decisions within municipal plans”. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp: 79-93.
  • PADEIRO, M. & COSTA, N. (2013): “L’Aire Metropolitaine de Lisbonne à la croisée des chemins”. Le Globe – Revue Genevoise de Géographie, No. 153, pp. 7-22.
  • PEREIRA, M. & SILVA, F. (2008): “Modelos de Ordenamento em confronto na área metropolitana de Lisboa: cidade alargada ou recentragem metropolitana?”. Cadernos metrópole, No. 20, pp. 107-123.
  • SANTOS, S. (2014): Desigualdades socioterritoriais e mobilidade geográfica: um retrato da Área Metropolitana de Lisboa, CIES e-Working Paper nº 195/2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10071/9882
  • SANTOS, S. (2017): “Mobility and Spatial Planning in Lisbon Metropolitan Area”. Finisterra - Revista Portuguesa de Geografia, Vol. 52, No. 104, pp. 57-72.
  • SALGUEIRO, T. (2001): Lisboa, Periferia e Centralidades. Oeiras: Celta.
  • SCHEINER, J. (2010): “Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles”. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 679–690.
  • SCHEINER, J. (2014): “The gendered complexity of daily life: Effects of life-course events on changes in activity entropy and tour complexity over time”. Travel Behaviour and Society, No. 1, pp. 91–105.
  • SCHEINER, J. & HOLZ-RAU, C. (2013): “A comprehensive study of life course, cohort, and period effects on changes in travel mode use”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, No. 47, pp. 167–181.
  • SHEPPARD, E. (2002): “The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks, and Positionality”. Economic Geography, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 307–330.
  • SILM, S., AHAS, R., NUGA, M. (2013): “Gender differences in space–time mobility patterns in a postcommunist city: a case study based on mobile positioning in the suburbs of Tallinn”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 814–828.
  • TORRADO, J., ROMANÍ, J., SUSINO, J. (2018): “Género y commuting en las regiones urbanas andaluzas. Revista Internacional de Sociología” Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. e106.
  • URRY, J. (2007): Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • UTENG, T. & CRESSWELL, T. (eds.) (2008): Gendered Mobilities. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet