Evidencia segmental del sintagma fonológico en español

Références bibliographiques

• Benet, A. (2012). El Fraseig Prosodic En La Parla Espontània Del Català i Del Castellà,
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer,
• Campos-Astorkiza, R. (2015). Segmental and prosodic conditionings on gradient voicing assimilation in spanish. Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical Linguistics, Language Acquisition and Language Contact.Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013, , 127-144.
• Campos-Astorkiza, R. (0000). Sibilant voicing assimilation in peninsular spanish as gestural blending. Variation within and Across Romance Languages, , 17-38.
• Cole, J., Hualde, J. I., & Iskarous, K. (1999). Effects of prosodic and segmental context on /g/-lenition in spanish. Fujimura, Proc.LP'89, 2, 575-589.
• Corporation, I. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics,
• Dannenberg, R. (2013). Audacity,
• D'Imperio, M., Elordieta, G., Frota, S., Prieto, P., & Vigário, M. (2005). Intonational phrasing in romance: The role of syntactic and prosodic structure. Prosodies, , 59-97.
• Elordieta, G. (2014). The word in phonology. To be Or Not to be a Word: New Reflections on the Definition of Word, , 6-65.
• Española, R. A. (2011). Nueva Gramática De La Lengua Española.Fonética y Fonología,
• Estebas-Vilaplana, E., & Prieto, P. (2010). Castilian spanish intonation. Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language, , 17-48.
• Estebas-Vilaplana, E., & Prieto, P. (2008). La notación prosódica del español: Una revisión del sp-ToBI. Estudios De Fonética Experimental, 17, 263-283.
• Frota, S., D'Imperio, M., Elordieta, G., Prieto, P., & Vigário, M. (2007). The phonetics and phonology of intonational phrasing in romance. Segmental and Prosodic Issues in Romance Phonology, , 131-153.
• Goldsmith, J. A. (2000). Las unidades subsegmentales en la fonología española: Enfoque autosegmental. Panorama De La Fonología Española Actual, , 337-356.
• González, C. (2006). The phonetics and phonology of spirantization in northcentral peninsular spanish. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, 40, 409-436.
• Harris, J. W. (2000). La espirantización en castellano y la representación fonológica autoseginental. Panorama De La Fonología Española Actual, , 357-371.
• Hayes, B. (1989). The prosodic hierarchy in meter. Rhythm and Meter, , 201-260.
• Hualde, J. I. (2003). El modelo métrico y autosegmental. Teorías De La Entonación, , 155-184.
• Hualde, J. I., & Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational variation in spanish: European and american varieties. Intonational Variation in Romance, , 350-391.
• Hualde, J. I., Shosted, R., & Scarpace, D. (2011). Acoustics and articulation of spanish /d/ spirantization. Proceedings of the International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), 17, 906-909.
• Hualde, J. I., Simonet, M., & Nadeu, M. (2011). Consonant lenition and phonological recategorization. Laboratory Phonology, 2(2), 301-329.
• Ito, J., & Mester, A. (2013). Prosodic subcategories in japanese. Lingua, 124(1), 20-40. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.016
• Ito, J., & Mester, A. (2009). The extended prosodic word. Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations, , 135-194.
• Ladd, D. R. (1986). Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 311-340.
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. doi:10.2307/2529310
• Martínez Celdrán, E. (1984). Fonética,
• Martínez Celdrán, E. (2013). Caracterización acústica de las aproximantes espirantes en español. Estudios De Fonética Experimental, 22, 11-35.
• Martínez Celdrán, E., & Fernández Planas, A. M. (2007). Manual De Fonética Española.Articulaciones y Sonidos Del Español,
• Navarro Tomás, T. (1918). Manual De Pronunciación Española,
• Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Prosodic Phonology,
• Nibert, H. (2000). Phonetic and phonological evidence for intermediate phrasing in spanish intonation. Phonetic and Phonological Evidence for Intermediate Phrasing in Spanish Intonation,
• Ortega-Llebaria, M. (2004). Interplay between phonetic and inventory constraints in the degree of spirantization of voiced stops: Comparing intervocalic /b/ and intervocalic /g/ in spanish and english. Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, , 237-253.
• Pak, M. (2008). The postsyntactic derivation and its phonological reflexes. The Postsyntactic Derivation and its Phonological Reflexes,
• Parrell, B. (2011). Dynamical account of how /b, d, g/ differ from /p, t, k/ in spanish: Evidence from labials. Laboratory Phonology, 2(2), 423-449.
• Polo Cano, N. (2015). Aproximación preliminar al sintagma fonológico en español. Loquens,
• Prieto, P. (2006). Phonological phrasing in spanish. Optimality-Theoretic Advances in Spanish Phonology, , 39-60.
• Quilis, A. (1981). Fonética Acústica De La Lengua Española,
• Quilis, A. (1993). Tratado De Fonología y Fonética Españolas,
• Samuels, B. D. (2011). Phonological Architecture: A Biolinguistic Perspective,
• Scheer, T. (2011). A Guide to Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories.how Extra-Phonological Information is Treated in Phonology since Trubetzkoy's Grenzsignale,
• Schmidt, L. B., & Willis, E. W. (2011). Systematic investigation of voicing assimilation of Spanish/s/in mexico city. Selected Proc 5th Conf on Lab Approaches to Romance Phonol, , 1-20.
• Selkirk, E. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371-405.
• Selkirk, E. (2011). The syntax-phonology interface. The handbook of phonological theory: Second edition (pp. 435-484) doi:10.1002/9781444343069.ch14
• Selkirk, E., & Tateishi, K. (1988). Constraints on minor phrase formation in japanese. CLS, (1), 316-336.
• Selkirk, E., & Tateishi, K. (1991). Syntax and downstep in japanese. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S.-Y.Kuroda, , 519-543.
• Truckenbrodt, H. (1999). On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(2), 219-255. doi:10.1162/002438999554048
• Truckenbrodt, H. (1995). Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus, and Prominence,
• Vigário, M. (2010). Prosodic structure between the prosodic word and the phonological phrase: Recursive nodes or an independent domain? Linguistic Review, 27(4), 485-530. doi:10.1515/tlir.2010.017
• Walsh, T., & Parker, F. (1983). The duration of morphemic and non-morphemic /s/ in english. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 201-206.