Administraciones públicas: Calidad institucional y adecuación entre fines y medios

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aalto, A., Elovainio, M., Tynkkynen, L. K., Reissell, E., Vehko, T., Chydenius, M. y Sinervo, T. (2018). What patients think about choice in healthcare? A study on primary care services in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 46(4), pp. 463-470.
• Andrews, R. y Entwistle, T. (2014). Public service efficiency: theories and evidence. Reframing the debate. London y New York: Routledge.
• Arellano, M. y Zamarro, G. (2007). The choice between public and private schools with or without subsidies in Spain. Preliminary and incomplete preprint.
• Beckert, W., Christensen, M. y Collyer, K. (2012). Choice of NHS-funded hospital services in England. The Economic Journal, 122, pp. 400- 417.
• Bernal, J. L. (2005). Parental choice, social class and market forces: The consequences of privatization of public services in education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(6), pp. 779-792.
• Bhattacharya, A. (2020). When and why might choice in public services have intrinsic (dis) value? Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE, n.º 220.
• Bovaird, T. y Löffler, E. (eds.) (2015). Public management and governance. Routledge.
• Brekke, K. R., Gravelle, H., Siciliani, L. y Straume, O. R. (2014). Patient choice, mobility and competition among health care providers. En Health care provision and patient mobility (pp. 1-26). Springer: Milano.
• Brekke, K. R., Nuscheler, R. y Straume, O. R. (2006). Quality and location choices under price regulation. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 15, pp. 207-227
• Burge, P., Devlin, N., Appleby, J., Rohr, C. y Grant, J. (2005). London patient choice project evaluation: A model of patients’ choices of hospital from stated and revealed preference choice data. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
• Calero, J. y Escardíbul, J. O. (2005). Financiación y desigualdades en el sistema educativo y de formación profesional en España. En V. Navarro, La situación social en España, pp. 337-383. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
• Cebolla-Boado, H., Radl, J. y Salazar, L. (2014). Aprendizaje y ciclo vital: la desigualdad de oportunidades desde el ciclo escolar hasta la edad adulta. Colección de Estudios Sociales, 39.
• Chun, Y. H. y Rainey, H. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity in US federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), pp. 1-30.
• Cordero Ferrera, J. M., Crespo Ceba da, E. y Pedraja Chaparro, F. (2013). Rendimiento educativo y determinantes según PISA: Una revisión de la literatura en España. Revista de Educación, 362, pp. 362- 161.
• Damman, O. C., Hendriks, M., Rademakers, J., Delnoij, D. M. y Groenewegen, P. P. (2009). How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews. BMC Public Health, 9(1), p. 423.
• De Cruppé, W. y Geraedts, M. (2017). Hospital choice in Germany from the patient’s perspective: a crosssectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), p. 720.
• Dixon, A., Robertson, R., Appleby, J., Burge, P., Devlin, N. y Magee, H. (2010). Patient choice: how patients choose and how providers respond. London: The King’s Fund.
• Douglas, M. (1982). In the active voice. Boston: Routledge.
• Dowding, K. (1992). Choice: Its Increase and its Value. British Journal of Political Science, 22(3), pp. 301-314.
• Dowding, K. y John, P. (2009). The value of choice in public policy. Public Administration, 87(2), pp. 219-233.
• El País (4 octubre 2019) ¿Escuela de ricos, escuela de pobres? Cómo la concertada y la pública segregan por clase social, https://elpais.com/sociedad/2019/09/30/actualidad/1569832939_154094.html
• Elías Andreu, M. y Daza Pérez, L. (2017). ¿Cómo deciden los jóvenes la transición a la educación posobligatoria? Diferencias entre centros públicos y privados-concertados. Revista de la Asociación de Sociología de la Educación (RASE), vol. 10, num. 1, pp. 5-22.
• Eurydice España (2017). Gasto público destinado a conciertos por comunidad autónoma. Año 2017 (miles de euros). http:// www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/ jcr:27afb1b1-269b-478a-98e8- 6cd0e0399cb5/2-4-1-gasto-p-blicodestinado- a-conciertos.pdf
• Farre, L., Ortega , F. y Tanaka, R. (2018). Immigration and thepublic-private school choice. Labour Economics, 51, pp. 184-201.
• Fotaki, M. (2007). Patient choice in healthcare in England and Sweden: From quasi-market and back to market? A comparative analysis of failure in unlearning. Public Administration, 85(4), pp. 1059- 1075.
• Fotaki, M., Roland, M., Boyd, A., Mcdonald, R., Scheaff, R. y Smith, L. (2008). What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(3), pp. 178-184.
• Fukuyama, F. (2015). Why is democracy performing so poorly? Journal of Democracy, 26(1), pp. 11-20.
• García-Serrano, C. y Albert, C. (2006). Tipo de escuela y logros educativos y laborales en España. Cuadernos Aragoneses de Economía, 1, pp. 83-112.
• Gaynor, M., Propper, C. y Seiler, S. (2012). Free to Choose? Reform and Demand Response in the English National Health Service. Working Paper, n.º 18574. National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Hood, C. (1998). The art of the state. Clarendon Press.
• Horn, J. G. y Miron, G. (1999). Evaluation of the Michigan public school academy initiative. Kalamazoo, MI: Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
• John, P. (2017). Finding exits and voices: Albert Hirschman’s contribution to the study of public services. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), pp. 512-529.
• Kahneman, D. y Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99-127).
• Kushner, R. J. y Poole, P. P. (1996). Exploring structure-effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations. Non profit Management and Leadership, 7, pp. 119-136.
• Lako, C. J. y Rosenau, P. (2008). Demand-Driven Care and Hospital Choice. Dutch Health Policy Toward Demand-Driven Care: Results from a Survey into Hospital Choice. Health Care Analysis, 17(1), pp. 20-35.
• Le Grand, J. (1991) . Equity and choice. New York: Harper Collins.
• Le Grand, J. ( 2 0 0 7 ) . The other invisible hand. Delivering public services through choice and competition, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Lodge, M. y Wegrich, K. (eds.). (2014). The problem-solving capacity of the modern state: Governance challenges and administrative capacities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Loeffler, E. (2020). Distinguishing Types and Levels of Co-production: Concepts and Definitions. En Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes, pp. 23-73. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
• Lowi, T. (1979). The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: Norton.
• March, J. G. y Olsen, J. P. (1984). The New Institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78(3), pp. 734-749.
• Moscone, F., Tosetti, E. y Vittadini, G. ( 2 0 1 2 ) . Social interaction in patients’ hospital choice: evidence from Italy. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 175(2), pp. 453-472.
• Olmedo, A. (2007). Reescribiendo las teorías de la reproducción social: influencia de la clase social en las trayectorias educativa y laboral del alumnado granadino de secundaria y bachillerato. Revista de Educación, 343, pp. 477-501.
• Parrado, S. (2015). El análisis de la gestión pública. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
• Parrado, S. y Reynaers, A-M. (2019). Reputation, Choice, and Targets: What Triggers Professionals to Perform Better? Comunicación presentada a la 77th Conferencia de MPSA (Midwest Political Science Association), Chicago (7 abril).
• Rohde, L. A., Campani, F., Oliveira, J. R. G., Rohde, C. W., Rocha, T. y Ramal, A. (2019) Parental Reasons for School Choice in Elementary School: A Systematic Review. Journal of School Choice, 13(3), pp. 1-18.
• Schneider, M., Teske, P., Marschall, M. y Roch, C. (1998). Shopping for schools: In the land of the blind, the one-eyed parent may be enough. American Journal of Political Science, 42, pp. 769-793.
• Schwarz, M. y Thompson, M. (1990). Divided westand: redefining politics, technology, and social choice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• SERMAS (Servicio Madrileño de Salud) (2014-2020). Memorias 2019-2013. Madrid. https://www.comunidad.madrid/servicios/salud/memorias-einformes- servicio-madrileno-salud
• Simmons, R., Powell, M. y Greener, I. (eds.) (2009). The consumer in public services: choice, values and difference. Bristol: Policy Press.
• Sotirov, M. y Winkel, G. (2016). Toward a cognitive theory of shifting coalitions and policy change: linking the advocacy coalition framework and cultural theory . Policy Sciences, 49(2), pp. 125-154.
• Stone, D. A. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision-making. New York: WW Norton.
• Swedlow, B. (2011). Cultural surprises as sources of sudden, big policy change. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), pp. 736-739.
• Thompson, M. (1984). The cultural construction of nature and the natural destruction of culture. IIASA Working Paper.
• Thompson, M., Ellis, R. y Wildavsky, A. B. (1990). Cultural theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
• Thompson, S. y Dixon, A. (2006). Choices in health care: the European experience. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 11(3), pp. 167-171.
• Tynkkynen, L. K. y Vrangbæk, K. (2018). Comparing public and private providers: a scoping review of hospital services in Europe. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), p. 141.
• UNESPA (2020). El seguro acusa la ralentización económica por la COVID-19 (21-10-2020). https:// unespa-web.s3.amazonaws.com/ main-files/uploads/2020/10/NdPResultados- 2020-Q3-FINAL.pdf
• Vega-Bayo, A. y Mariel, P. (2018). School choice across Different Regions of Spain. Hacienda Pública Española, 227(4), pp. 11-36.
• Victoor, A., Delnoij, D. M., Friele, R. D. y Rademakers, J. J. (2012). Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), p. 272.
• Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation. American Political Science Review, 81(1), pp. 3-21.