Relativas tautológicas

  1. María Victoria Escandell Vidal 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Dicenda: Estudios de lengua y literatura españolas

ISSN: 0212-2952,  1988-2556

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 39

Páginas: 141-154

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/DICE.76412 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Dicenda: Estudios de lengua y literatura españolas

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Free relative clauses can give rise to tautological structures, such as El que sabe, sabe (‘He who knows knows’). In this paper, two central questions are addressed: i) How can informative interpretations be obtained from tautological sentences? and ii) Why is the interpretation sensitive to word order? I will show that the interpretation of tautological relatives can be predicted in a straightforward way as the by-product of several factors: the informational status of the constituents, the lexical properties of the predicates, and the operation of general cognitive principles governing human communication.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • -ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude, “Semántica y léxico: Topoï, estereotipos y frases genéricas”, Revista Española de Lingüística, 25 (2) (1995), pp. 297-310.
  • -ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude, “Las tautologías: características lingüísticas y funcionamiento”, en Análisis del discurso: lengua, cultura, valores: Actas del I Congreso Internacional, Madrid, Arco Libros, 2006, pp. 1-14.
  • -ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude, “Las formas sentenciosas: un fenómeno lingüístico”, Revista de Investigación Lingüística, 13 (2010), pp. 17-43.
  • -AUTENRIETH, Tanja, “Tautologien sind Tautologien”, en Eckard Rolf (ed.), Pragmatik, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1997, pp. 12-32.
  • -BOSQUE, Ignacio (ed.), Advances in the Analysis of Spanish Exclamatives, Columbus, Ohio State University Press, 2017.
  • -BRUCART, Josep Maria, “Oraciones de relativo”, en Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), Enciclopledia de Lingüística Hispánica, Abingdon, Routledge, 2016, pp. 722-736.
  • -BULHOF, Johannes y Steven GIMBEL, “Deep tautologies”, Pragmatics and Cognition 9 (2) (2001), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.9.2.06bul
  • -BURING, Daniel y Manuel KRIZ, “It’s that, and that’s it! Exhaustivity and homogeneity presuppositions in clefts (and definites)”, Semantics and Pragmatics 6 (6) (2013), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.6
  • -CAPONIGRO, Ivano, Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-words Cross-linguistically, Tesis doctoral, Los Angeles, University of California, 2003.
  • -CAUDAL, Patrick y David NICOLAS, “Types of degrees and types of event structures”, en Claudia Maienborn y Angelika Wöllstein (eds.), Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications, Tubinga, Niemeyer, 2005, pp. 277–300.
  • -ESCANDELL-VIDAL, Victoria 1990, “Nominal tautologies in Spanish”, comunicación presentada en el 3er congreso IPrA, 1990 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345682433_Nominal_Tautologies_in_Spanish_1990_IPrA_Presentation
  • -ESCANDELL-VIDAL, Victoria, “Tautologías nominales y conocimiento compartido”, en Susana Rodríguez Rosique y Jordi Antolí Martínez (eds.), El conocimiento compartido: Entre la pragmática y la gramática, Berlín, DeGruyter, 2020, pp. 63–82.
  • -ESCANDELL-VIDAL, Victoria y Elena VILINBAKHOVA, “Coordinated tautologies in Spanish and Russian”, Intercultural Pragmatics, 15 (3) (2018), pp. 315–348.
  • -ESCANDELL-VIDAL, Victoria y Elena VILINBAKHOVA, “Negated tautologies and copular contradictions”, International Review of Pragmatics, 11 (2) (2019), pp. 153–199.
  • -DAYAL, Veneeta, “Free relatives and ever: identity and free choice readings”, en Aaron Lawson (ed.), Proceedings of SALT VII (1997), pp. 99-116.
  • -FRASER, Bruce, “Motor Oil Is Motor Oil”, Journal of Pragmatics, 12 (1988), pp. 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90080-X
  • -HORN, Laurence R., “A pragmatic approach to certain ambiguities”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 4 (3) (1981), pp. 321-358. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25001059
  • -HORN, Laurence R., “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature”, en Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context, Washington, Georgetown University Press, 1984, pp. 11-42.
  • -HORN, Laurence R., “The lexical clone: pragmatics, prototypes, productivity”, en Rita Finkbeiner y Ulrike Freywald (eds.), Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse, Berlin, DeGruyter, 2018, pp. 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110592498-010
  • -HUDDLESTON, Rodney, “A comparative tautology”, Linguistic Inquiry, 2 (2) (1971), pp. 252-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4177632
  • -KENNEDY, Chris, Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison, Nueva York, Garland, 1999.
  • -KENNEDY, Christopher y Louise McNALLY, “Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates”, Language, 81 (2) (2005), pp. 345–381.
  • -KRIFKA, Manfred, “Basic notions of information structure”, en Caroline Fery y Manfred Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies of Information Structure 6, Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam, 2007. También en Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55 (2008), pp. 243–276. https://doi.org/10.1556/aling.55.2008.3-4.2
  • -LARSON, Richard, “’Missing prepositions’ and the analysis of English free relative clauses”, Linguistic Inquiry, 18 (2) (1987), pp. 239–266.
  • -LEONETTI, Manuel y M. Victoria Escandell-Vidal (eds.), La estructura informativa, Madrid, Visor, en prensa.
  • -LEVINSON, Stephen C., Significados presumibles. La teoría de la implicatura conversacional generalizada. (Trad. esp. de Manuel Martí Sánchez y Beatriz Expósito de la Torre), Madrid, Gredos, 2004.
  • -LINK, Godehard, “The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice theoretical approach”, en Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze y Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, Berlin, DeGruyter, 1983, pp. 302–323.
  • -MEIBAUER, Jörg, “Tautology as presumptive meaning”, Pragmatics and Cognition, 16 (2008), pp. 439–470. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.16.3.02mei
  • -MIKI, Etsuzo, “Evocation and tautologies”, Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (1996), pp. 635-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00105-7
  • -PORTOLES, José, “Escalas informativas aditivas: pruebas del español”, Spanish in Context, 4 (2) (2007), pp. 135-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sic.4.2.02por
  • -ROOIJ, Robert van y Katrin SCHULZ, “Topic, focus, and exhaustive interpretation”, en Chungmin Lee, Ferenc Kiefer y Manfred Krifka (eds.), Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures. Cham, Springer, 2017, pp. 63-82.
  • -ROOTH, Mats, “A theory of focus interpretation”, Natural Language Semantics, 1 (1992), pp. 75-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617
  • -SIMIK, Radek, “Free Relatives”, en Daniel Gutzmann, Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann y Thomas Zimmermann (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, Oxford, Wiley, 2021, pp 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118788516.sem093
  • -SNIDER, Todd, “Using tautologies and contradictions”, en Eva Csipak y Hedde Zeijlstra (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, Göttingen, LinG, 2015, pp. 590–607. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2015.v19i0.252
  • -SONNENHAUSER, Barbara, “Tautologies at the interfaces: Wer kann, der kann”, Journal of Pragmatics, 117 (2017), pp. 16-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.05.010
  • -SPERBER, Dan y DEIRDRE Wilson, Relevance. Communication and Cognition, Oxford, Blackwell, 1986/1995. (Trad. Española: La relevancia, Madrid, Visor, 1994)
  • -VILINBAKHOVA, Elena, “Chto budet, to (i) budet: On one pattern of tautologies in Russian”, Komp’juternaja Lingvistika i Intellektual’nye Tehnologii, 17 (2018), pp. 775–790.
  • -VILINBAKHOVA, Elena y Victoria ESCANDELL-VIDAL, “People are people to me: The interpretation of tautologies with frame-setters”, Journal of Pragmatics, 143 (2019), pp. 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.013
  • -VILINBAKHOVA, Elena y Victoria ESCANDELL-VIDAL, “Interpreting nominal tautologies: Dimensions of knowledge and genericity”, Journal of Pragmatics, 160 (2020), pp. 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.014
  • -VILINBAKHOVA, Elena y Victoria ESCANDELL-VIDAL “Tautologies with proper names in discourse: Rhetorical relations and interpretation”, Language & Communication, 76 (2021), pp. 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.10.007
  • -WARD, Gregory L. y Julia HIRSCHBERG, “A pragmatic analysis of tautological utterances”, Journal of Pragmatics,15 (1991), pp. 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90109-b
  • -WIERZBICKA, Anna, “Boys will Be Boys: 'Radical Semantics' vs 'Radical Pragmatics'”, Language 63 (1) (1987), pp. 95-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/415385
  • -WIERZBICKA, Anna, “Boys will Be Boys. A Rejoinder to Bruce Fraser”, Journal of Pragmatics, 12 (1988), pp. 221-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90081-1
  • -WILSON, Deirdre y Dan SPERBER, “La teoría de la relevancia”, Revista de investigación lingüística, VII (2004), pp. 233-282.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet