Simple discrimination training and conditional discrimination response

  1. Pérez Fernández, Vicente J.
  2. Polín, Eduardo
Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 32

Número: 1

Páginas: 250-255

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de psicología

Resumen

La discriminación condicional es un procedimiento cuyo uso está ampliamente extendido en el AEC (Análisis Experimental del Comportamiento), especialmente las denominadas �Igualaciones a la Muestra�. Aunque se ha puesto en práctica con una amplia variedad de especies, el comportamiento de humanos con competencias verbales en este tipo de tareas puede involucrar otras variables de control diferentes a las contingencias de cuatro términos programadas. El objetivo de este trabajo fue comprobar si se podían adquirir discriminaciones condicionales aunque las contingencias de refuerzo no involucrasen a la muestra. Participaron 109 alumnos de psicología que fueron distribuidos en tres condiciones. Todos fueron expuestos a dos bloques de entrenamiento (A y B) con una muestra y tres comparaciones, no obstante, en el 75% de los ensayos del bloque B la muestra no funcionaba realmente como un estímulo condicional. Se manipularon la simultaneidad muestra-comparaciones y el requerimiento de respuesta de observación a la muestra, dando lugar a tres condiciones diferentes. Los resultados no mostraron diferencias entre la velocidad de adquisición del bloque A y del B en ninguna condición, lo que apunta a que el comportamiento de los participantes estaba más controlado por la configuración estimular que por las contingencias de reforzamiento.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baron, A., Kaufman, A. & Stauber, K. A. (1969). Effects of instructions and reinforcement feedbac on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 701-712.
  • Berryman, R., Cumming, W. W. & Nevin, J. A. (1963). Acquisition of delayed matching in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analylis of Behavior, 6, 101-107.
  • Catania, A. C. (1988). Learning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. & Shimoff E. (1981). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233-248.
  • Clayton, M. C. & Hayes, L. J. (2004). A comparison of match-to-sample and respondent-type training of equivalence clases. The Psychological Record, 54, 579-602.
  • Critchfield, T. S. & Perone, M. (1990). Verbal self-reports of delayed matching to sample by humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 321-349.
  • Cumming, W. W. & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. En D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization, 284-330. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.
  • Debert, P. Matos, M. A. & McIlvane, W. (2007). Conditional relations with compound abstract stimuli using a go/no-go procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 89-96.
  • Debert, P., Huziwara, E. M., Faggiani, R. B., Siomes de Mathis, M. E. & McIlvane, W. J. (2009). Emergent conditional relations in a go/no-go procedure: Figure-ground and stimulus position compound relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92, 233-243.
  • Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C. & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
  • Eckerman, D. A. (1970). Generalization and response mediation of a conditional discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analylis of Behavior, 13, 301-316.
  • Greer, R. D. & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal Behaviour Analysis: Inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. Boston: Pearson.
  • Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51-65.
  • Hayes, L. J., Thompson, S. & Hayes, S. C. (1989). Stimulus equivalence and rule following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 275-291.
  • Hayes, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385-392.
  • Horne, P. J. & Lowe, F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behaviour. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
  • Lawrence, D. H. (1963). The nature of a stimulus: Some relationships between learning and perception. En S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a Science, Vol. 5 (pp. 179-212). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Leader, G. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001a). Establishing fraction-decimal equivalence using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 51, 151-165.
  • Leader, G. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001b). Matching-to-sample and respondent-type training as methods for producing equivalence relations: Isolating the critical variable. The Psychological Record, 51, 429-444.
  • Leader, G., Barnes, D. & Smeets, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
  • Leader, G., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Smeets, P. M. (2000). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure III. The Psychological Record, 50, 63-78.
  • Leonhard, C. & Hayes, S. C. (1990). Prior inconsistent testing affects equivalence responding. Presentación en la Association for Behavior Analysis Convention. Atlanta.
  • Lippman, L. G. & Meyer, M. E. (1967). Fixed-interval performance as related to instructions and subjects verbalizations of the contingency. Psychonomic Science, 8, 135-136.
  • Luciano, M. C., Gómez, I. & Rodríguez, M. (2007). The role of multiple-examples training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal Experimental Analysis Behavior, 87, 349-365.
  • Lyderson, T. & Perkins, D. (1974). Effects of response-produced stimuli upon conditional discrimination performance. Journal of the Experimental Analylis of Behavior, 21, 307-314.
  • Matthews, B. A. (1977). Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453-467.
  • Moreno, D., Cepeda, M. L., Hickman H., Peñalosa, E. & Ribes, E. (1991). Efecto diferencial de la conducta verbal descriptiva de tipo relacional en la adquisición y transferencia de una tarea de discriminación condicional de segundo orden. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 17, 81-99.
  • Paul, C. (1983). Sample specific ratio effects in matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 77-85.
  • Peláez, M., Gewirtz, J. L., Sánchez, A. & Mahabir, N. M. (2000). Exploring stimulus equivalence formation in infants. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 9, 20-25.
  • Pérez, V. & García, A. (2009). Aprendizaje sin refuerzo explícito en discriminaciones condicionales con estímulos complejos. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 41, 57-66.
  • Pérez, V. & García, A. (2010). Contingencias de aprendizaje sin refuerzo explícito. Psicothema, 22, 416-423.
  • Ribes, E., Cepeda, M. L., Hickman, H., Moreno, D. & Peñalosa, E. (1992). Effects of visual demonstration, verbal instructions, and prompted verbal descriptions of the performance of human subjects in conditional discrimination. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 23-36.
  • Riesen, A. H. & Nissen, H. W. (1942). Nospatial delayed response by the matching technique. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 34, 307-313.
  • Seraganian, P. (1979). Extra dimensional transfer in the easy-to-hard effect. Learning and Motivation, 10, 39-57.
  • Shimoff, E. (1981). Uninstructed human responding: responsivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies. Journal of Applied Analysis of Behavior, 3, 117-122.
  • Shimoff, E. (1986). Post-sesion verbal reports and the experimental analysis of behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 19-22.
  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
  • Sidman, M. & Cresson, O. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalence in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515-523.
  • Sidman, M., Cresson, O. Jr. & Willson-Morris, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 261-273.
  • Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W. & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44.
  • Sidman, M., Wynne, C.K., McGuire, R. W. & Barnes, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261-274.
  • Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Cullinan, V. (2000). Establishing equivalence classes with match-to-sample format and simultaneous-discrimination format conditional discrimination tasks. The Psychological Record, 50, 721-744.
  • Smeets, P. M., Leader, G. & Barnes, D. (1997). Establishing stimulus classes in adults and children using a respondent-type training procedure: A follow-up study. The Psychological Record, 47, 285-308.
  • Smeets, P. M., Barnes, D. & Roche, B. (1997). Functional equivalence in children: derived stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 1-17.
  • Törneke, N., Luciano, M.C. & Valdivia, S. (2008). Rule-governed behavior and psychological problemas. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8, 141-156.
  • Torres, A. & López, F. (2004). Discriminación condicional de la propia conducta, verbalización de contingencias y relaciones condicionales emergentes. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 30, 139-162.
  • Urcuioli, P. J. & Honig, W. K. (1980). Control of choice in conditional discriminations by sample-specific behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 251-277.
  • Vaughan, W. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36-42.
  • Wyckoff, L. B. (1952). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Part I. Psychological Review, 59, 431-442.
  • Zentall, T. R. & Hogan, D. E. (1978). Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: The effect of negative instances and prior adaptation to the transfer stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 177-186.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet