Cloud Cuckoo Landevidence from a study of student drop-out

  1. Joe Cullen
  2. Cristina Castellanos
Revista:
Campus Virtuales

ISSN: 2255-1514

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 3

Número: 1

Páginas: 22-30

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Campus Virtuales

Resumen

This paper considers some of the issues around the migration of higher education services to ‘the cloud’, selecting MOOCs as an example of one element of service delivery that is being seen as an example of how new forms of distributed services can revolutionise higher education – in particular by opening up access to more people from diverse backgrounds. The paper presents some counter-arguments to this view, and explores whether these new technologies of teaching and learning are able to preserve the integrity of ‘reflexive dialogue’ that seems to reflect the core value of our higher education institutions. It presents evidence from an EU-funded project – STAY IN – which is researching student drop out and how it can be reduced through on-line services – as a contribution to these debates.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ball, S. (2000) Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: towards the performative society?, The Australian Educational researcher, 27(2):1-23
  • Bion, W. (1961) Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistock.
  • Cotoi, C. (2011). Neoliberalism: a Foucauldian Perspective. International Review of Social Research, 1: 2 109-124
  • European Commission (2013) Commission Staff Working Document: Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2013, SWD(2013) 217 final
  • European Commission (2013) Digital Agenda Scorebord Indicators (on-line database)
  • Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: University Press.
  • Garfinkel, H. (2006) Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers
  • Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world. London: Profile Books.
  • HEFCE (2012). Leaving University Early: The final research report from the back on course project -back on course’. London: HEFCE; UCAS: Open University
  • HEFCE (2012). What works?’ Report on the Student Retention and Success programme. London: HEFCE/Paul Hamlyn Foundation
  • Hess, C. and Ostrom, E. (2007). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons – From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Kaplan, L. (1978). Oneness and Separateness: From Infant to Individual. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Kohn, A. (1993) Punished by rewards: the trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, Praise and other bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Miller, E. (1993) From Dependency to Autonomy: Studies in Organization and Change. London: Free Association Books Pawson, R., Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. (2005), Realist review--a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:21-34.
  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1999) Knowledge as a Global Public Good in Kaul, I., Grungberg, I. and Stern, M.A. (Eds.) Global Public Goods. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Watson, P. (2012) A multi-level security model for partitioning workflows over federated clouds, Jnl. Cloud Computing Advances, Systems and Applications, July
  • Weiner, B. (1990) Searching for the roots of applied attribution theory in Graham, S and Folkes, V (Eds.) Attribution Theory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum
  • Winnicott, D. (1965) Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development. International Universities Press
  • Yuan, L. and Powell, S. (2013) MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education, http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet