Analysis of PLEs’ implementation under OER design as a productive teaching-learning strategy in Higher Education. A case study at Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

  1. Vázquez-Cano, Esteban 1
  2. Martín-Monje, Elena 1
  3. Castrillo de Larreta-Azelain, María Dolores 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Revista:
Digital Education Review

ISSN: 2013-9144

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: Number 29 June 2016

Número: 29

Páginas: 62-85

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Digital Education Review

Resumen

Este artículo presenta una investigación en la que analizamos la funcionalidad didáctica de los Personal Learning Environment (PLE) y los Open Educational Resources realizados por estudiantes que cursan el “Máster universitario en Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación en la Enseñanza y Tratamiento de Lenguas” de la Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED) durante dos cursos académicos: 2014-2015 / 2015-2016. A través de una concepción metodológica basada en la etnografía virtual, aplicamos un procedimiento de análisis con una doble vertiente cualitativa mediante el empleo del programa Atlas-Ti y del enfoque reticular-categorial del análisis de redes sociales con la aplicaciónde UCINET y la representación mediante el visor yED Graph Editor. Los resultados de esta investigación muestran que el empleo conjunto de PLE y OER diseñados por los propios estudiantes mejora su competencia digital, principalmente en dimensiones como: búsqueda de información en línea, articulación de las necesidades de información, localización de información relevante, selección eficaz de recursos, navegación entre recursos en línea y creación de estrategias personales de información. Además el estudio reticular de los foros mediante técnicas de análisis de redes nos han proporcionado una red en los que los principales beneficios de los PLE y OER se relacionan con las siguientes categorías: enfoque centrado en el alumno, desarrollo de estrategias para el manejo de la información y la creación de un modelo de aprendizaje auto-regulado.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alloway, T., Horton, J., Alloway, R. G., & Clare Dawson (2013). Social networking sites and cognitive abilities: Do they make you smarter? Computers & Education, 63, 10-16.
  • Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments –the future of eLearning? eLearning Papers, 2(1).
  • Attwell, G. (2010). Context and the design of Personal Learning Environments. Presented at the PLE2010 Conference, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.pontydysgu.org/2010/07/context-and-the-design-of-personal-learningenvironments/
  • Barabási, A.L. (2002). Linked-The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA.: Perseus Publishing.
  • Bass, R. (2012). Disrupting Ourselves: The Problem of Learning in Higher Education. Educause Review, March/April 2012.
  • Berners-Lee T. (2010). Open Linked Data for a Global Community. Presented at Gov 2.0 Expo 2010, Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga1aSJXCFe0&feature=player_embedded
  • Bissell, A., & Boyle, J. (2007). Towards a Global Learning Commons: ccLearn. Educational Technology, 4(6), 5-­â€9.
  • Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA.: Analytic Technologies.
  • Castañeda, L., & Adell, J. (Eds.). (2013). Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje: claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. Alcoy: Marfil.
  • Castañeda, L., & Camacho, M. (2012). Desvelando nuestra identidad digital. El profesional de la información, julio-agosto, 21(4), 354-360.
  • Castañeda, L., & Soto, J. (2010). Building Personal Learning Environments by using and mixing ICT tools in a professional way. Digital Education Review, 18, 9-25.
  • Castells, M., & Monge, P. (2011). Network Multidimensionality in the Digital Age. Prologue to the Special Section. International Journal of Communication, 5, 788-793.
  • Caverlee, J., Liu, L., & Webb, S. (2010). The SocialTrust framework for trusted social information management: Architecture and algorithms. Information Sciences, ScienceDirect, 180, 95-112.
  • CETIS. (2006). The personal learning environments reference model project. JISC CETIS Wiki. Retrieved from http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Ple
  • Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., & Jarke, M. (2012). LaaN: Convergence of knowledge management and technology-enhanced learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(2), 177189. doi:10.1109/TLT.2011.3
  • Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175.
  • Conole, G. (2013). Open, social and participatory media. Designing for learning in an open world. New York: Springer.
  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and selfregulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 3-8.
  • Downes, S. (2007). Open Educational Resources and the Personal Learning Environment. Taipei, Taiwan. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/Downes/open-educational-resources-andthe-personal-learning-environment
  • Downes, S. (2010). New Technology Supporting Informal Learning. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(1), 27-33.
  • Drexler, W. (2010a). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 369-385.
  • Drexler, W. (2010b). A Networked Learning Model for Construction of Personal Learning Environments in Seventh Grade Life Science. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, Colorado.
  • Dublin Descriptors (2005). Shared "Dublin" descriptors for the Bachelor´s, Master´s and Doctoral awards. (Draft 1.31 working document on JQI meeting in Dublin. 2004PC).
  • Fetterman, D. (1984). Ethnography in educational evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Fiedler, S. H. D., & Väljataga, T. (2013). Personal learning environments: A conceptual landscape revisited. eLearning Papers, 35, 1-16.
  • Fuchs, C. (2005). CMC-based model learning in language teacher education: A German-American telecollaboration. In Thompson, I., & Hiple, D. (Eds.). Selected papers from the 2004 NFLRC symposium: Distance Education, Distributed Learning and Language Instruction (pp.141-156). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
  • Griff, E. R., & Matter, S. F. (2013). Evaluation of an adaptive online learning system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 170-176.
  • Guth, S. (2009). Personal learning environments for language learning. In M. Thomas (ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 451–471). Hershey: IGIGlobal.
  • Hall, G. E. (2010). Technology’s Achilles Heel: Achieving High-Quality Implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 231-253.
  • Hicks, A., & Sinkinson, C. (2015). Critical connections: Personal learning environments and information literacy. Research in Learning Technology, 23, 1-12.
  • Johnson, M., & Liber, O. (2008). The personal learning environment and the human conditions: From theory to teaching practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 3-15.
  • Johnson, M. W., & Sherlock, D. (2014). Beyond the Personal Learning Environment: Attachment and control in the classroom of the future. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 146-164.
  • Juarros, V. M., Ibáñez, J. S., & Crosetti, B. B. (2014). Research results of two personal learning environments experiments in a higher education institution. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 205-220.
  • Knoke, D., & Yang S (2008). Social Network Analysis. United States of America: SAGE.
  • Letón, E., Durbán, M., D’Auria, B., & Lee, D.J. (2009). Self learning mini-videos through Internet and mobile telephones: a help to the student in the Bologna process. Edulearn, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.iated.org/concrete2/paper_detail.php?paper_id=5950
  • Lowe, C. (2010). Considerations for Creative Commons licensing of open educational resources: The value of copyleft. Computers and composition online. Retrieved from www.bgsu.edu/cconline/open/introduction. html
  • Marin, V., Negre, F., & Perez, A. (2014). Construction of the foundations of the PLE and PLN for collaborative learning. Comunicar, 21(42), 35-43.
  • Marín, V., Salinas, J., & De Benito, B. (2012). Using SymbalooEDU as a PLE Organizer in Higher Education. En Proceedings of the The PLE Conference 2012, 11 al 13 de julio 2012, Aveiro, Portugal. Retrieved form http://revistas.ua.pt/index.php/ple/issue/ current
  • Martin-Monje, E. (2012) From VLE to PLE in English for Specific Purposes. Professional and Academic English, 40, 14-18.
  • Martín-Monje, E., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Fernández, M. (2015). Peer assessment of language learning resources in virtual learning environments with e-rubrics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(4), 321-342.
  • Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal Learning Environments. In Veletsianos, G. (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education, 177-193. Edmonton: AU Press.
  • Mercier, E. M., & Higgins S. E (2013). Collaborative learning with multi-touch technology: Developing adaptive expertise. Learning and Instruction, 25, 13-23.
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Okada, A. (2012). Open Educational Resources and Social Networks: Co-Learning and Professional Development. Londres: Scholio Educational Research y Publishing.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1988). Discurso de la acción. Madrid: Cátedra.
  • Şahin, S., & Uluyol, Ç. (2016). Preservice Teachers’ Perception and Use of Personal Learning Environments (PLEs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2284/3649
  • Sánchez E., & García-Rodicio, H. (2013). Using online measures to determine how learners process instructional explanations. Learning and Instruction, 26, 1-11.
  • Seidman, S.B. (1983). Network structure and minimum degree. Social Network, 5, 269-287.
  • Shaikh, Z. A., & Khoja, S. A. (2014). Personal learning environments and university teacher roles explored using Delphi. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 202-226.
  • Singh, V., & Holt, L. (2013). Learning and best practices for learning in open-source software communities. Computers & Education, 63, 98-108.
  • Smith, M. S., & Casserly, C. (2006). The Promise of Open Educational Resources. Change, Fall. Retrieved from http://learn.creativecommons.org/wp-­â€ content/uploads/2008/03/changearticle.pdf.
  • UNESCO (2011a). Guidelines for Open Educational Resources (OER) in Higher Education. UNESCO. Commonwealth of Learning.
  • UNESCO (2011b). A Basic Guide to Open Educational Resources (OER). UNESCO. Commonwealth of Learning.
  • Van Harmelen, M. (2008). Design trajectories: Four experiments in PLE implementation. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 35-46.
  • Vázquez-Cano, E., Fombona, J., & Fernández, A. (2013). Virtual Attendance: Analysis of an Audiovisual over IP System for Distance Learning in the Spanish Open University (UNED). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 14(3), 402-426.
  • Vázquez-Cano, E., Martín Monje, E., & Fernández, M. (2014). El rol de las e-rúbricas en la evaluación de materiales digitales para la enseñanza de lenguas en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12, 135-157.
  • Vázquez-Cano, E., & Calvo, E. (2016). Adolescentes y cibermedios. Una didáctica basada en aplicaciones periodísticas para smartphones. Estudios Pedagógicos, 41(2), 255-270.
  • Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Scholars and faculty members’ lived experiences in online social networks. Internet and Higher Education, 16, 43-50.
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wiley, D. A. (2006). The Current State of Open Educational Resources. Paper for Expert Meeting on Open Educational Resources, OECD–CERI, Malmö (6-7 February 2006).
  • Wilson, S. (2008). Patterns of Personal Learning Environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 17-34.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet