Aprender con el diálogo, dialogar para aprenderEstudio de caso en MOOC

  1. Roura-Redondo, Margarita
  2. Osuna-Acedo, Sara
Journal:
Index.comunicación: Revista científica en el ámbito de la Comunicación Aplicada

ISSN: 2174-1859

Year of publication: 2018

Issue Title: Educación mediática y factor relacional

Volume: 8

Issue: 2

Pages: 103-128

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Index.comunicación: Revista científica en el ámbito de la Comunicación Aplicada

Abstract

By using dialogue, participatory and collaborative methodologies are encouraged, due to the fact that dialogue must always consider the active intervention of all the interlocutors through tolerance, respect, inclusion, equity, open-mindedness, listening and self-questioning our own reasoning. Massive online open courses, MOOC, have revolutionized the online educative environment promoting the reconsideration of new disruptive approaches in their didactic methods. Dialogue will be key in these new learning methods, since it will facilitate and encourage the interaction and communication among the educative virtual community, and will stimulate the collaborative work of their members. This article presents a research done on 40 MOOCs from eleven popular platforms and institutions, which, with interviews in depth with experts in digital learning, aims to analyze the use of dialogue through participative and collaborative methodologies. The results allow us to conclude by stating that, although it’s true that methodological practices based on dialogue are highly appreciated by experts, these are not a generalized procedure in the analyzed courses, which does not discard the fact that very interesting activities have been found based on dialogue, participation and collaboration.

Bibliographic References

  • Acosta, E. S. y Otero, J. J. E. (2014). Clasificación de medios de evaluación en los MOOC. Edutec: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa, 48(2). Recuperado desde: https://goo.gl/Bs34GG
  • Agrawal, A.; Venkatraman, J.; Leonard, J. y Paepke, A. (2015). A YouEDU: Addressing confusion in MOOC discussion forums by recommending instructional video clips. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Education Data Mining, 297-304.
  • Álvarez, J. M. (2014). Evaluar para conocer, examinar para excluir. Madrid: Morata.
  • Aparici, R. y Osuna-Acedo, S. (2013). La Cultura de la Participación. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 4 (2), 137-148. Recuperado desde: http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2013.4.2.07
  • Assmann, H. (2002). Placer y ternura en educación. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Bohm, D. (2013). On dialogue. New York: Routledge.
  • Burbules, N. (1999). El diálogo en la enseñanza. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.
  • Downes, S. (2013). The quality of massive open online courses. Recuperado desde: https://goo.gl/bMjuZt
  • Elder, L. y Paul, R. (2010). The Role of Socratic Questioning in Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 71(5), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659809602729
  • Flecha, R. (1997). Compartiendo Palabras: el aprendizaje de las personas adultas a través del diálogo. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Freire, P. y Faundez, A. (2013) Pedagogía de la pregunta. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del Oprimido. Madrid: Siglo xxi.
  • Houston, S. L.; Brady, K.; Narasimham, G. y Fisher, D. (2017, abril). Pass the Idea Please: The Relationship between Network Position, Direct Engagement, and Course Performance in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, 295-298. ACM.
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NY: NYU press.
  • Joksimović, S.; Manataki, A.; Gašević, D.; Dawson, S.; Kovanović, V. y De Kereki, I. F. (2016, abril). Translating network position into performance: importance of centrality in different network configurations. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 314-323. ACM.
  • Kellogg, S.; Booth, S. y Oliver, K. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learning, 15 (5). http://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852
  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies, Segunda edición. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Lévy, P. (2004). Inteligencia colectiva: por una antropología del ciberespacio. Recuperado desde: https://goo.gl/qe8MWw
  • McGuire, R. (2013). Building a sense of community in MOOCs. Campus Technology, 26 (12), 31-33.
  • Marta-Lazo, C. y Gabelas, J. A. (2016). Comunicación Digital. Un modelo basado en el factor R-elacional. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
  • Marta-Lazo, C.; Osuna-Acedo, S. y Frau-Meigs, D. (2018). Collaborative lifelong learning and professional transfer. Case study: ECO European Project. Interactive Learning Environments, 26, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1451346
  • Margaryan, A.; Bianco, M. y Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional Quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Comput. Educ., 80(C), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
  • McMillan, J. H. y Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry, MyEducationLab Series. Pearson.
  • Nicol, D. J. y Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
  • Ostashewski, N. y Reid, D. (2012). Delivering a MOOC using a social networking site: The SMOOC design model, en Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on internet technologies and society (ITS 2012), Nov. 28-30, 217-222. Perth, WA: IADIS.
  • Osuna-Acedo, S. y Cantillo Valero, C. (2017). Open, Mobile and Collaborative Educational Experience. Case study: The European ECO Project. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 23(12), 1215-1237. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-023-12
  • Osuna-Acedo, S.; Marta-Lazo, C. y Frau-Meigs, D. (2018). From sMOOC to tMOOC, learning towards professional transference. ECO European Project. Revista Comunicar, XXVI(55), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-10
  • Paul, R. y Elder, L. (2003). La mini-guía para el pensamiento crítico, conceptos y herramientas. California: Fundación para el pensamiento crítico.
  • Quintana, J. G. (2017). Interactividad y participación desde el modelo comunicativo de los MOOC. index. comunicación, 7(1), 269-288.
  • Roura-Redondo, M. (2017). Aprendizaje dialógico en escenarios virtuales: Percepción de la comunidad universitaria sobre el diálogo online. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación/Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 8(2), 287-300. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2017.8.2.18
  • Roura-Redondo, M.; Camarero, L. y Osuna-Acedo, S. (2018). La evaluación para aprender (EpA) y el empoderamiento de los estudiantes. En J. Rodríguez Terceño (coord.), Investigando en Comunicación e Investigando en Docencia (pp. 411-423) Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Recuperado desde: https://goo.gl/fzdXvM
  • Wise, A. F. y Cui, Y. (2018). Learning communities in the crowd: Characteristics of content related interactions and social relationships in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 22, 221–242.
Data source: Dialnet