El debate Modernismo versus Postmodernismosu impacto en la universidad

  1. Mª José García Ruiz 1
  2. Sagrario Crespo Garrido 2
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
    info

    Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ha64j07

Revue:
Revista española de educación comparada

ISSN: 1137-8654

Année de publication: 2022

Titre de la publication: Creatividad, curiosidad y pensamiento innovador en Educación Comparada en relación a las nuevas normas del siglo XXI

Número: 40

Pages: 69-90

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista española de educación comparada

Résumé

Postmodernism, while supporting epistemologically itself in the poststructuralist theory, has marked its footprint in education with the realities of ‘fragmentation’, ‘incoherence’ and ‘political chaos’. While there are academics which assert that ‘there is not a post-modern theory of education’ (Green, 1994), we assist currently to the debate of modern academics versus postmodern theorists that reclaim, respectively, their particular vision of the university in terms of the idea of the university, the teleology, social functions and the epistemology in the university institution. Specially imperative is the analysis of the contributions of the Bolonia Process in the university institution and in the debate modernism-postmodernism, for the educational competency of the European Union has left a footprint in the university educational tradition of the European continent. In sum, among the conclusions of this debate it is essential the promotion of the humanities, in the sense that it belongs to the university the mission of the social and political leader-ship of Western society. It is the responsibility of the humanities and the social sciences -more than of other practical disciplines currently promoted- the design of the model of man and society of the XXIst century. Without such orientation, the society rests in the dictate of the economy as only social lookout, with all the risks, limitations and impover-ishment that this implies

Références bibliographiques

  • Anderson, P. (2000). Los orígenes de la postmodernidad. Madrid: Akal.
  • Ball, S. (1998). Big policies/small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, 34, 2, 119-130.
  • Ball, S. J. (2006). Education Policy and Social Class. The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
  • Bauman, Z. (1997). Universities: Old, New and Different. En A. Smith & F. Webster (Eds.), The Postmodern University? Contested visions of Higher Education in Society. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Bertens, H. (1995). The idea of the postmodern: a history. London: Routledge.
  • Carter, J. (1998). Postmodernity and the Fragmentation of Welfare. London: Routledge.
  • Comisión Europea (1993). ¿Qué futuro para la educación superior en Europa? Reacciones al Memorándum. Bruselas: Comisión Europea.
  • Comisión Europea (2003). El papel de las universidades en la Europa del conocimiento. Bruselas: Comisión Europea.
  • Comisión Europea (2006). Delivering on the modernization agenda for universities: education, research and innovation. Bruselas: Comisión Europea.
  • Committee of Higher Education (1963). Higher Education. Report of the Committee appointed by the Prime Minister under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins 1961-1963. London: HMSO.
  • Comunicado de Berlín (2003). Educación Superior Europea. Berlín: Conferencia Ministros Educación Superior.
  • Cowen, R. (1996). Performativity, Postmodernity and the University. Comparative Education, vol. 32, 245-258.
  • Cowen, R. (2003). Agendas of attention: A response to Ninnes and Burnett. Comparative Education, vol. 39, nº 3, 299-302.
  • Crook, D. (2011). Standards in English education: An enduring historical issue. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 18.
  • Crosier, D., Purser, L. & Smidt, H. (2007). Trends V: Universities shaping the European Higher Education Area. Brussels: EUA.
  • Dale, R. (2007).Specifiying Globalization Effects on National Policy. En B. Lingard & J. Ozga (Eds.). Education Policy and Politics. London: Routledge.
  • Declaración de Bolonia (1999). El Espacio Europeo de la Enseñanza Superior. Bolonia: Conferencia Ministros Educación Superior.
  • Declaración de Praga (2001). Hacia el Área de la Educación Superior Europea. Praga, Conferencia Ministros Educación Superior.
  • Declaración de la Sorbona (1998). Declaración conjunta para la armonización del diseño del Sistema de Educación Superior Europeo. París: Ministros de Educación Superior.
  • Fernández, J. M. (1999). Manual de política y legislación educativas. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
  • Filmer, P. (1997). Disinterestedness and the Modern University. En A. Smith & F. Webster (Eds.), The Postmodern University? Contested visions of Higher Education in Society. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • García Garrido, J. L. (1996). Fundamentos de Educación Comparada. Madrid: Dykinson.
  • García Garrido, J.L. (1998). Un nuevo horizonte para la educación secundaria. En AA.VV., Aprender para el futuro. La educación secundaria, pivote del sistema educativo. Madrid: Fundación Santillana.
  • García Ruiz, M. J. (2011). La Educación Comparada: una disciplina entre la Modernidad y el Postmodernismo. Revista Latinoamericana de la Educación, vol. 2, 40-59.
  • Gellert, C. (Ed.) (1993). Higher Education in Europe. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Gibbons, M. (2004). Globalization, Innovation and Socially Robust Knowledge. En R. King (Ed.), The University in the Global Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Green, A. (1994). Postmodernism and state education. Journal of Education Policy, vol. 9, nº 1, 67-83
  • Habermas, J. (1988). Modernidad versus Postmodernidad. En J. Picó (Ed.), Modernidad y Postmodernidad. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Henry, M. et al. (2001). The OCDE, globalization and education policy. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Jarvis, P. (1996). Continuing education in a late-modern or global society: towards a theoretical framework for comparative analysis. Comparative Education, 32, 2, 233-44.
  • Jones, B. (1995). Sleepers Wake! Technology and the Future of Work. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  • Ker, I. (1999). Newman´s Idea of a University. A Guide for the Contemporary University?. En Smith, D. y Langslow, A. K. (Eds.), The Idea of a University. London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • King, R. (2004). The university in the Global Age. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kogan, M. y Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming higher education. London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Kumar, K. (1997). The Need for Place. En A. Smith & F. Webster (Eds.), The Postmodern University? Contested visions of Higher Education in Society. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Kunitz, S. J. (Ed.). (1955). Twentieth Century Authors – First Supplement. New York.
  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition. A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
  • Mehta, S. & Ninnes, P. (2000). Postpositivist debates and comparative education: resistance, reinvention, revolution. Paper presented at the CIES annual conference. San Antonio, Texas. Comparative Education, 39, 3, 279-297.
  • Ministerio de Universidades (2021). Anteproyecto de la Ley Orgánica del Sistema Universitario a los efectos previstos en el artículo 26.4 de la Ley 50/1997, de 27 de noviembre, del Gobierno. Madrid: Ministerio de Universidades.
  • National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE). (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society (The Dearing Report). London: HMSO.
  • Ninnes, P. & Burnett, G. (2003). Comparative Education research: poststructuralist possibilities.
  • Ninnes, P. & Mehta, S. (2000). Postpositivist theorizing and research: challenges and opportunities for Comparative Education. Comparative Education Review, 44, 2, 205-212.
  • Olson, C. (1966). Projective Verse. En R. Creeley (Ed.), Selected Writings. New York.
  • Paulston, R. (1999). Mapping comparative education after postmodernity. Comparative Education Review, 43 (4), 438-63.
  • Peters, M. (Ed.) (1998). Naming the multiple: poststructuralism and education. Connecticut: Bergin and Garvey.
  • Puelles Benítez, M. de (1993). Estado y educación en las sociedades europeas. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 1.
  • Räsänen, R. (2006). Quality Education – A Small Nation´s Investment for Future. Oulu: Faculty of Education. Teaching material for teacher education. Document not published.
  • Rizvi, F. and Lingard, B. (2009).The OCDE and Global Shift in Education Policy. En Cowen, R. & Kazamias, A.M. (Eds). International Handbook of Comparative Education. London: Springer.
  • Rust, V. D. (1991). Post-modernism and its comparative implications. Comparative Education Review, 35, 4.
  • Scott, P. (1997). ‘The Postmodern University?’. En A. Smith & F. Webster. (Eds.), The Postmodern University? Contested Visions of Higher Education in Society. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education, Comparative Education, 41, 4. Pp. 455-470.
  • Schleicher (2007). Introduction. In McKinsey Report. How the world´s best-performing school systems come out on top. Mckinsey & Company.
  • Smart, B. (1992). Modern Conditions, Postmodern Controversies. London: Routledge.
  • Smith, D. y Langslow, A. K. (Eds.) (1999). The Idea of a University. London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Smith, A. & Webster, F. (Eds.) (1997). The Postmodern University? Contested Visions of Higher Education in Society. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Sotelo Martínez, I. (2003). La invención de Europa: la realidad histórico-cultural de Europa. En AA.VV., La formación de europeos. Madrid: Academia Europea de Ciencias y Artes.
  • Watson, D. (2007). Whatever happened to the Dearing Report? UK higher education 1997-2007. A professional lecture by David Watson. London: Institute of Education.
  • Watson, D. and Amoah, M. (Eds.) (2007). The Dearing Report. Ten years on. London: Institute of Education, Bedford Way Papers.
  • Welch, A. (2003). Technocracy, uncertainty and ethics. Comparative Education in an age of postmodernity and globalization. En R. Arnove and C. A. Torres (Eds.), Comparative Education. The Dialectic of the local and the Global. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Yeatman, A. (1994). Postmodern Revisionings of the Political. London: Routledge.
  • Young, R. (1997). Comparative methodology and postmodern relativism. International Review of Education, 43, 4, 497-505.
La source de données: Dialnet