Perfiles del participante en LMOOCanálisis bibliográfico y estudio de caso

  1. Díez-Arcón, Paz 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Journal:
Bellaterra: journal of teaching and learning language and literature

ISSN: 2013-6196

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 14

Issue: 4

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/JTL3.979 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Bellaterra: journal of teaching and learning language and literature

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Language learning through massive open online courses (LMOOCs) have distinctive features from the rest of online formative proposals. The courses currently working have assessment criteria closer to traditional methodologies, where success is associated with course completion, which leads to a concern about the massive format itself, as high completion levels are not achieved. They also offer assessment tasks not promoting the real practice of the language. Throughout the study of socio-economic and online behavioral profiles it is noticed that participants are not engaged with the course, but they are active during the time they stay on it. The results imply that the acquisition of a broader knowledge about participants that reflects if they achieve their learning goals is needed and, so that, permit a possible dissociation between success and completion. Moreover, alternatives for a content design prioritizing the practice of the target language are suggested.

Bibliographic References

  • Anderson, A.; Huttenlocher, D.; Kleinberg, J. y Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with massive online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web (WWW ´14). Nueva York. Association for Computing Machinery, 687-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568042
  • Atenas, J. (2015). Modelo de democratización de los contenidos albergados en los MOOC. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1). pp. 3-14. Recuperado de: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/149557/
  • Bárcena, E., Read, T., Martin-Monje, E., y Castrillo, M. D. (2014). Analysing student participation in Foreign Language MOOCs: a case study. In EMOOCs 2014: European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit (pp. 11–17 “Professional English”).
  • Beaven, T., Codreanu, T. y Creuzé, A. (2014). Motivation in a language MOOC: issues for course designers. In: Martín-Monje, Elena and Bárcena, Elena eds. Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries. Berlin: De Gruyter Open, pp. 48–66.
  • Castrillo, M.D. (2014). 5 Language Teaching in MOOCs: the Integral Role of the Instructor. In Language MOOCs (pp. 67-90). Sciendo Migration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.5
  • Castrillo, M.D.; Martín-Monje, E. y Vázquez-Cano, E. Guía práctica para el diseño y tutorización de MOOC. Madrid. Telefónica Educación Digital. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324390717_Guia_practica_para_el_diseno_y_tutorizacion_de_MOOC
  • Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2017). The role of MOOCs in the learning of languages: Lessons from a Beginners’ English Course. Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, (28), 23-35. Recuperado de: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/54001
  • Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2014). Massive online open courses and language learning: the case for a beginners’ English course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 242-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.042
  • Chacón-Beltrán, R., y Lawley, J. (2014). El aprendizaje de idiomas mediante MOOCs: la experiencia del curso Empieza con el inglés en Miríada X y UNED-COMA. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307855847_El_aprendizaje_de_idiomas_mediante_MOOCs_la_experiencia_del_curso_Empieza_con_el_ingles_en_Miriada_X_y_UNED-COMA
  • Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., y Emanuel, E. (2013). The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350964
  • Cormier, D. y Siemens, G. (2010). The Open Course: Through the Open Door: Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement. Educause Review. Recuperado de: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2010/8/through-the-open-door-open-courses-as-research-learning-and-engagement
  • Daniel, J.; Vázquez-Cano, E. y Gisbert, M. (2015). El futuro de los MOOC: ¿aprendizaje adaptativo o modelo de negocio? RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12, 64-73.
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2475
  • Gafaro, B. (2020). MOOCs in the Language Classroom: Using MOOCs as Complementary Materials to Support Self-Regulated Language Learning. In Recent Tools for Computer-and Mobile-Assisted Foreign Language Learning. 194-211. IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1097-1.ch009
  • Glance, D. G., Forsey, M., y Riley, M. (2013). The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First monday. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i5.4350
  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Global reach and local practice: The promise of MOOCS. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 5–15. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10125/44377
  • Kizilcec, R., Piech, C., y Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 170-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330
  • Knox, J. (2014) Digital culture clash: “massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC, Distance Education, 35:2, 164-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917704
  • Martín-Monje, E., Bárcena, E., y Read, T. (2014). Peer-to-peer interaction and linguistic feedback in foreign language MOOCS. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 18(1), 167-183. Recuperado de: http://www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev181ART10.pdf
  • Martín-Monje, E. y Bárcena, E. (Eds.). (2015). Language MOOCs: providing learning, transcending boundaries. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
  • Martín-Monje, E., Castrillo, M. D., y Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2018). Understanding online interaction in language MOOCs through learning analytics. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 251-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1378237
  • Martín-Monje, E. (2019). Capítulo 4 La creación de recursos educativos abiertos y MOOC en lenguas extranjeras. Tecnologías Integradas en la Didáctica de Lenguas Extranjeras (TIDLE), 35.
  • Ozan, O., Ozarslan, Y. y Yıldız, H. (2018). LMOOC Design and Development Process for an Agglutinative Language: "Türkçe Öğreniyorum" Case. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2. 140-149. Recuperado de: https://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/proceedings18/2018i/18_15.pdf
  • Richards, J. C. y Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., y Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57-69. Recuperado de: https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol10_No1.htm
  • Sokolik, M. (2014). What constitutes an effective Language MOOC. En E.Martín- Monje y E. Bárcena, (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing Learning,Transcending Boundaries.16-32.Berlin: De Gruyter Open. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.2
  • Talaván, N. (2010). Claves para comprender la destreza de la comprensión oral en lengua extranjera. Epos: Revista de Filología, 26, 195-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/epos.26.2010.10643
  • Türkay, S.; Eidelman, H; Rosen, Y.; Seaton, D.; López, G. y Whitehill, J. (2017). Getting to know English language learners in MOOCs: their motivations, behaviours, and outcomes. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning and Scale (L@S ´17). Association For Computing Machinery. Nueva York. 209-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3051457.3053987
  • Vázquez-Cano, E., López-Meneses, E., y Barroso-Osuna, J. (2016). El futuro de los MOOC. Retos de la formación on-line, masiva y abierta. Educatio Siglo XXI, 34(1), 245- 247.
  • Veletsianos, G.; Collier, A. y Schneider, E. (2015). Digging Deeper into Learners’ Experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, Notetaking, and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology. 46. 570-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12297
  • Yousef, A., Chatti, M., Schroeder, U. y Wosnitza, Y. (2014). What Drives a Successful MOOC? An Empirical Examination of Criteria to Assure Design Quality of MOOCs. IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, 2014, 44-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2014.23
  • Whitmer, J., Schiorring, E., y James, P. (2014). Patterns of persistence: what engages students in a remedial English writing MOOC? In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 279-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2567574.2567601
  • Wolfenden, F., Cross, S., y Henry, F. (2017). MOOC adaptation and translation to improve equity in participation. Journal of Learning for Development-JL4D, 4(2). Recuperado de: https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/209/243
Data source: Dialnet