Blended learning y la convergencia entre la educación presencial y a distancia

  1. Lorenzo García Aretio 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Revista:
RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1138-2783

Año de publicación: 2018

Título del ejemplar: La revolución del blended learning en la educación a distancia

Volumen: 21

Número: 1

Páginas: 9-22

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/RIED.21.1.19683 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The convergence, the confluence, between the methodologies and resources of the faceto- face and distance education systems is now a reality. One of the variants of dual or mixed institutions is to offer a particular program, subject or course with a combination of face-toface moments in the classroom, and other work activities outside the academic institution with the support of technologies. It is the “blended-learning”. We clarify that this blend and combination of methods and resources was already being carried out by the first distance universities with the support of face-to-face tutorials long before the arrival of digital technologies. In this work, rather than consider it a blend or combination of educational modalities, we are inclined to consider it as an integration of means, resources, technologies, methodologies, activities, strategies and, both face-to-face and distance learning, techniques to satisfy each specific learning need. As a further variant of this integration there appears the “flipped classroom” in which there are times planned to be spent in the classroom and times to be at home with the emphasis placed on reorganizing the work of the students in the classroom (more interaction) and at home (more autonomous work), as opposed to what used to be, as well as the new role of the teacher.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aiello, M. & Cilia, W. (2004). El Blended Learning como práctica transformadora. Pixel-Bit, 23, 21-26.
  • Bartolomé, A. R. (2004). Blended Learning. Conceptos básicos. Pixel-Bit, 23, 7-20.
  • Bergmann, J., y Sams, A. (2013). Flip Your Students’ Learning. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 16-20
  • Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  • Coaten, N. (2003). Blended e-learning. Educaweb, 69. Recuperado de http://www.educaweb.com/esp/servicios/monografico/formacionvirtual/11 81076.asp
  • Cottrell, D. M., & Robison, R. A. (2003). Blended learning in an accounting course. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 261-269.
  • Devaney, L. (2014). Top predictions for tomorrow’s classrooms. Recuperado de https://www.eschoolnews.com/2014/09/08/future-tomorrows-classrooms-934/
  • Driscoll, T. (2012). Flipped Learning and democratic Education: The Complete Report. Recuperado de: http://www.flipped-history.com/2012/12/flipped-learning-democratic-education.html
  • García Aretio, L. (2001). Educación a distancia. De la teoría a la práctica. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • García Aretio, L. (2004a). Blended learning, ¿es tan innovador? Editorial BENED. Recuperado de http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/bibliuned:20108/blendlerninnovador.pdf
  • García Aretio, L. (2004b). Viejos y nuevos modelos de educación a distancia. Bordón. Vol 56(3 y 4), (pp. 409-429).
  • García Aretio, L. (2009). Por qué va ganando la educación a distancia. Madrid: UNED.
  • García Aretio, L. (2011). El fenómeno Khan. Blog García Aretio. Recuperado de: http://aretio.blogspot.com.es/2011/05/el-fenomeno-khan.html
  • García Aretio, L. (2012). Convergencia presencia-distancia. Contextos universitarios mediados, 12(2). Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/HYnxZp
  • García Aretio, 2014). Bases, mediaciones y futuro de la educación a distancia en la sociedad digital. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • García Aretio, L. y Ruíz Corbella, M. (2010) La eficacia de la educación a distancia: ¿un problema resuelto? Teoría de la educación, 22(1). ISSN: 1130-3743.
  • García Aretio, L. y Marín Ibáñez, R. (1998). Introducción general. En Aprendizaje abierto y a distancia. Perspectivas y consideraciones políticas. Madrid: UNED-UNESCO.
  • Garrison, D. R. y Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Community of inquiry and blended learning. In Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 13-48.
  • Graham, C. (2005). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  • Gülbahar, Y., & Madran, R. (2009). Communication and collaboration, satisfaction, equity, and autonomy in blended learning environments: A case from Turkey. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 117-138.
  • Horn, M. y Staker H (2011). The Rise of K-12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute. Recuperado de: https://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/the-rise-of-k-12-blended-learning/
  • Jeong, J. S., González, D. y Cañada, F. (2016). Students' Perceptions and Emotions Toward Learning in a Flipped General Science Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25 (5), 747-758.
  • Jen-Her, W.; Robert, D.T.; Tzyh-Lih, H. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1).
  • Lage, M.J.; Platt, G.J. y Treglia, M. Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1).
  • Laumakis, M., Graham, C., & Dziuban, C. (2009). The Sloan-C pillars and boundary objects as a framework for evaluating blended learning. Journal for Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1). Recuperado de: http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/journal-issues/
  • Llorente, M.C. (2009). Formación semipresencial apoyada en Red (Blended Learning). Diseño de acciones para el aprendizaje. Eduforma, Alcalá de Guadaira.
  • Mantyla, K. (2001). Blending e-Learning. ASTD: USA.
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., y Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. US Department of Education.
  • Niekerk, J., y Webb, P. (2016). The effectiveness of brain-compatible blended learning material in the teaching of programming logic. Computers & Education, 103, 16–27.
  • Reynolds, T. y Greiner, C. (2005). Integrated field experiences in online teacher education: A natural blend? En C. J. Bonk y C. R. Graham (Eds.). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  • Siemens, G., Gašević, D., y Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: a review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. Recuperado de: http://linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf
  • Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Education and Technology, 43(6), 51-54.
  • Tourón, J., y Santiago, R. (2015). El modelo Flipped Learning y el desarrollo del talento en la escuela. Revista de Educación, 368, 196-231.
  • Turpo, O. (2010). Contexto y desarrollo de la modalidad educativa blended learning en el sistema universitario iberoamericano. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa. 15(45), 345-370.
  • Usta, E., & Ozdemir, S. M. (2007). An analysis of students’ opinions about blended learning environment. Paper presented at the International Educational Technology (IETC) Conference, Nicosia, Turkey.
  • Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 1-12.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet