Profe, ¿puedo preguntar? Una breve introducción a la interacción de preguntas y respuestas entre profesor y alumno

  1. León, José A.
  2. Peñalba, G.
  3. Escudero, Inmaculada
Revista:
Revista Nebrija de Lingüística aplicada a la enseñanza de Lenguas

ISSN: 1699-6569

Ano de publicación: 2010

Número: 7

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Revista Nebrija de Lingüística aplicada a la enseñanza de Lenguas

Resumo

In this paper we present some important conclusions extracted from literature on question-answering that can be applied to the educational field. On the one hand, we present a brief revision of empirical research that allow us to know the State of Art, as well as some of the basic regulatory mechanisms, and types of questions that can be generated. On the other hand, we show some illustrating applied research with a clear

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allen, J. (1987). Natural language understanding. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
  • Almasi, J.F. (1993). The nature of fourth graders’ sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Tesis inédita. University of Maryland, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College Park.
  • Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Hamilton, R.L. y Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the Author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Delaware: International Reading Association.
  • Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P.L. y Brown, A. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13 (2), 221-252.
  • Bransford, J.D. y Stein, B.S. (1993). Solución IDEAL de problemas. Barcelona: Labor.
  • Chi, M.T.H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.H. y LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 437-477.
  • D’Andrade, R.G. y Wish, M. (1985). Speech act theory in quantitative research on interpersonal behavior.Discourse Processes, 8, 229-259.
  • Davey, B. y McBride, S. (1986). Generating self-questioning after reading: A comprehension assist for elementary students. Journal of Educational Research, 80 (1), 43-46.
  • Dillon, J. T. (1982). The effect of questions in education and other enterprises. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 14, 127-152.
  • Dillon, J. T. (1985). Using questions to foil discussion. Teaching and teacher education, 1, 109-121.
  • Dillon, J.T. (1985). The remedial status of student questioning. Comunicación presentada en The conference on Questioning as a Knowledge-seeking method, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
  • Dillon, J. T. (1988). Questioning in education. En M. Meyer (Ed.), Questions and questioning (pp. 98-117).Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Graesser, A.C. y Person, N.K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
  • Graesser, A.C., Person, N. y Huber, J. (1992). Mechanisms that generate questions. En T. Lauer, E. Peacock y A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Questions and information systems (pp. 167-187). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K. y Huber, J. (1993). Question asking during tutoring and in the design of educational software. En M. Rabinowitz (Ed.), Cognitive science foundations of instruction (pp. 149-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Graesser, A.C.; Singer, M. y Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
  • Hyman, R.T. (1979) Strategic questioning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 366-381.
  • King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning.American Educational Research Journal, 27, 664-687.
  • King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 338-368.
  • King, A. y Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children's knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(2), 127-148.
  • Lehnert, W.G. (1978). The process of question answering. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • León, J.A. y Escudero, I. (2003). Protocolos verbales en el estudio de las inferencias: una metodología emergente. En J.A. León (Ed.), Conocimiento y Discurso – Claves para Inferir y Comprender. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • León, J.A. y Peñalba, G.. (2002). Understanding causality and temporal sequence in scientific discourse. En J.C. Otero, J.A. León, y A.C. Graesser (Coord.), The psychology of science text comprehension.(pp. 199-221). Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Mayer, R.E. (1980). Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical text: An experimetnal test of the learning strategy hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(6), 770-784.
  • Mayer, R.E. (1984) Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19 (1), 30-42.
  • McCormick, C.B. y Pressley, M. (1997). Educational Psychology. Learning, instruction, assessment. New York, NJ: Longman.
  • Menke, D. y Pressley, M. (1994). Elaborative interrogation: Using ‘why’ questions to enhance the learning from text. Journal of Reading, 8, 642-645.
  • Miyake, N. y Norman, D.A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357-364.
  • Nix, D. (1985). Notes on the efficacy of questioning. En A.C. Graesser y J.B. Black (Eds.), The psychology of questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Olson, G.M., Duffy, S.A. y Mack, R.L. (1985). Question-asking as a component of text comprehension. En A.C. Graesser y J.B. Black (Eds.), The Psychology of Questions (pp. 219-226). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Otero, J. y Graesser, A.C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and Instruction, 19 (2), 143-175.
  • Palincsar, A.S. y Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
  • Person, N.K., Kreuz, R.J., Zwaan, R. y Graesser, A.C. (1995). Pragmatics and pedagogy: Conversational rules and politeness strategies may inhibit effective tutoring. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 161-188.
  • Perkins, D.N. y Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18, 6-25. Pressley, M.; Wood, E.; Woloshyn, V.E.; Martín, V.; King, A. y Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91-109.
  • Rosenshine, B. [V.] y Trapman, S. (1992). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of research. Comunicación presentada en The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco (Abril 1992).
  • Seda, I. y Pearson, D. (1991). Interviews to assess learner’s outcomes. Reading Research and Instruction, 31 (1), 22-32.
  • Schank, R.C. y Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum.
  • Singer, H. y Donlan, D. (1982). Active comprehension: Problem solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 166-186.
  • Singer, M.; Graesser, A.C. y Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421-441.
  • Waterman, A.H., Blades, M. y Spencer, C. (2001). Interviewing children and adults: The effect of question format on the tendency to speculate. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 521-531.
  • Wood, K.D. (1988). Techniques for assessing studens’ potential for learning.The Reading Teacher, January, 440-447.