Linguistic Competence in Early Childhood Education as a Predictor of Verbal Naming Speed

  1. Encarnación Hernández-Pérez 1
  2. José A. Rabadán-Rubio 1
  3. Delia Cayuelas-Abellán 2
  4. Arianna Giorgi 1
  5. Ana Gallego-Martínez 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  2. 2 Centro de Desarrollo Infantil y Atención Temprana HIGEA
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915,  1886-144X

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 33

Número: 4

Páginas: 610-616

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2020.180 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: el presente estudio determinó el valor predictivo de la competencia lingüística de niños/as de Educación Infantil en la velocidad de denominación verbal. Método: participaron 86 alumnos de segundo ciclo de Educación Infantil, quienes fueron evaluados con los Índices de Comprensión Verbal (ICV) y Adquisición de Vocabulario (AV) de WPPSI-IV; Vavel Infantil y el Test de Denominación Verbal (TDV). Resultados: alumnos/as que obtuvieron una puntuación elevada en el ICV y en AV precisaron de menos tiempo en el TDV. La competencia lingüística predijo la velocidad de denominación, siendo Vavel Infantil la tarea que obtuvo una mayor correlación. Conclusiones: la competencia lingüística de niños/as de Educación Infantil permite predecir su aptitud para denominación verbal. El conocimiento léxico-semántico fue la dimensión de competencia lingüística con mayor valor predictivo para el TDV. Las tareas propuestas dependen de la misma base anatómica. Las tareas de denominación y comprensión léxica están ligadas al lóbulo temporal y, más concretamente, al área de Wernicke.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Funding: Project funded as part of the Strategy for the improvement of educational success OBJECTIVE 2020 (Ministry of Education). Coordinated by the General Directorate of Attention to Diversity and Educational Quality (Region of Murcia, Spain).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adani, S., & Cepanec, M. (2019). Sex differences in early communication development: Behavioral and neurobiological indicators of more vulnerable communication system development in boys. Croatian Medical Journal, 60(2), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.3325 / cmj.2019.60.141
  • Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). To wait in Tier 1 or intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining firstgrade response to intervention in reading. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914532234
  • Arslan, S., Broc, L., Olive, T., & Mathy, F. (2020). Reduced deficits observed in children and adolescents with developmental language disorder using proper nonverbalizable span tasks. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 96, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103522
  • Barel, E., & Tzischinsky, O. (2018). Age and sex differences in verbal and visuospatial abilities. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 51-61. https://10.5709 / acp-0238-x
  • Bermeosolo, J. (2012). Memoria de trabajo y memoria procedimental en las dificultades específicas del aprendizaje y del lenguaje: algunos hallazgos [Working memory and procedural memory in Specific Learning and Language Difficulties: some findings]. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología, 11, 57-75. https://doi:10.5354/0719-4692.2012.24516
  • Bishop, D.V.M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., & Greenhalgh, T. (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphicosensus sutdyd of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Chil Psychology and Psichiatry, 58(10), 1068- 1080.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12721
  • Braze, D., McRoberts, G. W., McDounough, C., Brady, S. A., & Fowler, C. A. (2011). Early precursors of reading-relevant phonological skills. In S. A. Brady, D. Braze & C. A. Fowler (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence (pp. 23-44). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00778.x
  • Brancal, M., Ferrer, A., Carreres, D., Tomás, I., & Ávila, V. (2005). VAVEL Infantil. Prueba de valoración del Vocabulario Español 3-6 años [Spanish Vocabulary Assessment Test 3-6 years old]. Lebón.
  • Cartmill, E., Armstrong, B. F., Gleitman, L. R., Goldin-Meadow, S., Medina, T. N., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later, Proccedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 13(28), 11278- 011283. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309518110
  • Claessens, A., Duncan, G., & Engel, M. (2009). Kindergarten skills and fifth-grade achievement: Evidence from the ECLS-K. Economics of Education Review, 28(4), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. econedurev.2008.09.003
  • Conti-Ramsden, G., & Durkin, K. (2015). What factors influence Language Impairment? Considering resilience as well as risk. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica, 67, 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444750
  • Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. (2014). The state of learning disabilities. Facts, trends and emerging issues. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
  • Dale, P. S., Tosto, M. G., Hayiou-Thomas, M. E., & Plomin, R. (2015). Why does parental language input style predict child language development? A twin study of gene-environment correlation. Journal of Communication Disorders, 57, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcomdis.2015.07.004
  • De la Calle Cabrera, A. M., Guzmán-Simón, F., & García-Jiménez, E. (2019). Los precursores cognitivos tempranos de la lectura inicial: un modelo de aprendizaje en niños de 6 a 8 años [Early cognitive precursors of initial reading: A learning model in children aged 6 to 8]. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 37(2), 345-361. https://doi. org/10.6018/rie.37.2.312661
  • Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., & Peisner-Feinberg, E. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 465-481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.95.3.465
  • Duff, F., Nation, K., Plunkett, K., & Bishop, D. (2015). Early prediction of language and literacy problems: Is 18 months too early? PeerJ 3, e1098. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1098
  • Fernández, A. L., & Lamas, L. F. (2018). Elaboración del test de velocidad de denominación para niños hispanohablantes: propiedades psicométricas y datos normativos [Development of the speed naming test for spanish-speaking children: Psychometric properties and normative data]. Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 10(2), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.5579/rnl.2018.449
  • Fonseca, L., Corrado, I., Lasala, E., García-Blanco, L., & Simian, M. (2019). Valor predictor y discriminante de la velocidad de denominación en español [Predictive and discriminant value of naming speed in Spanish: An experience with Argentine children]. Ocnos, 18(2), 85-96. https:// doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2019.18.2.1812
  • Fuchs, L., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness to Intervention: A decade later. Journal Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195-203. https://doi. org/10.1177/0022219412442150
  • González-Valenzuela, M. J., Díaz-Giráldez, F., & López-Montiel, M. (2016). Cognitive predictors of word and pseudoword reading in Spanish first-grade children. Frontiers in Psicology, 7(774), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00774
  • González, R. M., Cuetos, F., Vilar, J., & Uceira, E. (2015). Efectos de la intervención en conciencia fonológica y velocidad de denominación sobre el aprendizaje de la escritura [Effects of the intervention on phonological awareness and naming speed on learning to write]. Aula Abierta, 43, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aula.2014.06.001
  • Grinblat, N., & Rosenblum, S. (2016). Why are they late? Timing abilities and executive control among students with learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 59, 105-114. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.07.012
  • Glover, T. A., & Albers C. A. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology. 45, 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.005
  • Harley, J. (2018). Why closing the word gap matters. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/education/content/dictionaries/key-issues/ word-gap/?region=international
  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.
  • Hernández-Expósito (2017). Funciones ejecutivas y trastornos del lenguaje: implicaciones para la evaluación y la intervención [Executive Functions and Language Disorders: Implications for evaluation and intervention]. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 37, 53-55. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2017.04.001
  • Horowitz-Kraus, T., Hutton, J., Phelan, K., & Holland, S. (2018). Maternal reading fluency is positively associated with greater functional connectivity between the child’s future reading network and regions related to executive functions and language processing in preschool-age children. Brain and Cognition, 121, 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2018.11.010
  • Jenkins, J. R., Hudson R. F., & Johnson E. S. (2007). Screening for service delivery in an RTI framework: Candidate measures. RTI Action Network http://www.rtinetwork.org/essential/assessment/screening/ screening-for-reading-problems-in-an-rti-framework
  • Kapa, L. L., & Plante, E. (2015). Executive function in SLI: Recent advances and future directions. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2(3), 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-015-0050-x
  • Klein, O., & Becker, B. (2017). Preschools as language learning environments for children of immigrants. Differential effects by familial language use across different preschool contexts. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 48, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rssm.2017.01.001
  • Krishman, S., Watkins, K., & Bishop, D. (2016). Neurobiological basis of language learning diffi culties. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 701-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.012
  • Landi, N., & Perdue, M. (2019). Neuroimaging genetics studies of specific reading disability and developmental language disorder: A review. Language Linguistic Compass, 13(9), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ lnc3.12349
  • Lee, J. C., Nopoulos, P. C., & Tomblin, J. B. (2020). Procedural and delcatative memory brain systems in developmental language disorder (DLD). Brain and Language, 205, 104789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bandl.2020.104789
  • Lum, J., Conti-Ramsden, G., Page, R., & Ullman, T. (2012). Working, declarative and procedural memory in specific language impariment. Cortex, 48(9), 1138-1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.06.001
  • Luque, J. L., Giménez, A., Bordoy, S., & Sánchez, A. (2016). De la teoría fonológica a la identificación temprana de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje de la lectura [From phonological theory to the early detection of specific learning difficulties in Reading]. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 36(3), 142-149. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2015.10.001
  • Milburn, T. F., Lonigan, C. J., Allan, D. M., & Phillips, B. M. (2017). Agreement among traditional and RTI-based definitions of reading-related learning disability with preschool children. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.011
  • Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Wang, Y., Hillemeier, M., Oh, Y., & Maczuga, S. (2018). Executive function deficits in kindergarten predict repeated academic diffi culties across elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.06.009
  • Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554-566. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.98.3.554
  • Pauls, L. J., & Archibald, L. M. (2016). Executive functions in children with specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(5), 1074-1086. https://doi. org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0174
  • Petscher, Y., Kim, Y. S., & Foorman, B. (2011). The importance of predictive power in early screening assessments: Implications for placement in the response to intervention framework. Assessment of Effective Intervention, 36(3), 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508410396698
  • Petersen, J. (2018). Gender differences in verbal performance: A metaanalysis of United States state performance assessments. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1269-1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648- 018-9450-x
  • Quintero, I., Hernández, S., Verche, E., Acosta, V., & Hernández, A. (2013). Disfunción ejecutiva en el Trastorno Específico del Lenguaje [Executive dysfunction in Specific Language Impairmen]. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 33, 172-178. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2013.07.003
  • Rabazo, M. J., García, M., & Sánchez, S. (2016). Exploración de la conciencia fonológica y la velocidad de nombrado en alumnos de tercero de Educación Infantil y primero de Educación Primaria y su relación con el aprendizaje de la lectoescritura [Exploration of phonological awareness and word speed in pupils in the 3rd grade of kindergarten and 1st grade of primary education and its relationship with literacy learning]. International Journal of Develpmental and Educational Psychology. INFAD Revista de Psicología, 1(1), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2016.n1.v1.271
  • Rescorla, L. (2011). Late talkers: Do good predictors of outcome exist? Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 17(2), 141-150. https:// doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.1108
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2009). Response to Intervention: Ready or not? Or, from wait-to-fail to watch-them-fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016158
  • Silinskas, G., Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2017). Classroom interaction and literacy activities in kindergarten: Longitudinal links to Grade 1 readers at risk and not at risk of reading diffi culties. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 321-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.002
  • Ullman, M. T., & Pierpont, E. (2005). Specific Language Impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41, 399-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70276-4
  • VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Gilberston, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.004
  • Wallentin, M. (2009). Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review. Brain Language, 108(3), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.07.001
  • Warren, S. F. (5 de diciembre de 2015). Right from Birth. Eliminating the talk gap in Young Children. Lena Building brains through early talk. https://www.lena.org/research-old/
  • Webster, R., & Shevell, M. (2003). Neurology of Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Child Neurology, 19(7), 471-481. https://doi.or g/10.1177/08830738040190070101
  • Wechsler IV, D. (2012). WPPSI-IV, Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para preescolar y primaria [Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence]. NCS Pearson.
  • Zimmerman, F. J., Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Christakis, D. A., Xu, D., Gray, S., & Yapanel, U. (2009). Teaching by Listening: The Importance of Adult-Child Conversations to Language Development. Pediatrics, 124(1), 342-349. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2267
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet