(Des)Igualdad de oportunidades y movilidad social

  1. Barragué Calvo, Borja
Revista:
Anuario de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  1. Barragué Calvo, Borja (ed. lit.)
  2. Sáez Lacave, María Isabel (ed. lit.)

ISSN: 1575-8427

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: Desigualdad y riqueza

Número: 20

Páginas: 159-172

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Anuario de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Resumen

Drawing primarily on the normative ethics and welfare economics literature on equality of opportunity, there is now widespread consensus on the basic principle of distributive justice: inequalities due to circumstances beyond people's control are unfair (and should be compensated for), while inequalities due to differing efforts are not seen as having ethical or policy salience. That is to say governments should pursue equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. After an analytical distinction where two very different conceptions of equality of opportunity are discussed, the article concludes that in today's societies there is broad justification for (some) equality of outcome - even if our goal is equality of opportunity.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acemoglu, D. y Autor, D., «Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings», en D. Card y O. Ashenfelter (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4, Parte B, 2011, pp. 1043-1171.
  • Anderson, E., «What is the Point of Equality», Ethics, Vol. 109, N.º 2, 1999, pp. 287-337. Armstrong, Chris, Rethinking equality. The Challenge of equal citizenship, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2006.
  • Arneson, R., «Equality of Opportunity», The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2015: disponible online enlazando desde http://plato.stanford. edu/entries/equal-opportunity/
  • Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T. y Saez, E., «Top Incomes in the Long Run of History», Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 49, N.º 1, 2011, pp. 3-71.
  • Bertrand, M. y Mullainathan, M., «Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination», NBER Working Paper, N.º 9873, 2003.
  • Brighouse, H. y Swift, A., Family Values. The Ethics of Parent-Child Relationships, Princeton y Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2014.
  • Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A. y Weisleder, A., «SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months», Developmental Science, Vol. 16, N.º 2, 2013, pp. 234-248.
  • Fishkin, J., Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2014.
  • Garnero, A., Hijzen, A. y Martin, S., «More Unequal, but more mobile? Earnings inequality and mobility in OECD Countries», OECD Social, Employment and Migration Papers, N.º 177, 2016.
  • Goldin, C. y Katz, L., The Race Between Education and Technology, Belknap Press, Cambridge (MA), 2008.
  • Harris, E. y Sammartino, F., «Trends in the Distribution of Household Income between 1979 and 2007», en D. W. Jorgenson, J. S. Landefeld y P. Schreyer (eds.), Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress, NBER Book Series Studies in Income and Wealth, 2011. Disponible en: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c12827.pdf.
  • Krueger, A., «The Rise and Consequences of Inequality in the United States», conferencia pronunciada en el Center for American Progress, 12 de enero, 2012. Disponible en https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/krueger_cap_speech_final_remarks.pdf
  • Milanovic, B., «Global income inequality: what it is and why it matters», World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, N.º 3865.
  • Piketty, T., «Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics», The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, N.º 3, 1995, pp. 551-584.
  • Piketty, T. y Saez, E., «Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998», The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, N.º 1, 2003, pp. 1-39.
  • Putnam, R., Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis, Simon and Schuster, Nueva York, 2015.
  • Rakowski, E., Equal Justice, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991.
  • Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice: Revised edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA), 1999.
  • Reeves, R. V. y Sawhill, I. V., «Equality of Opportunity: Definitions, Trends, and Interventions», ponencia presentada en la Conferencia sobre «Desigualdad de Oportunidades Económicas», Reserva Federal de Boston, 2014, 17-18 de octubre. Disponible online enlazando desde https://www.bostonfed.org/inequality2014/papers/reeves-sawhill.pdf
  • Roemer, J., «Defending Equality of Opportunity», The Monist, Vol. 86, N.º 2, 2003, pp. 261-282.
  • Roemer, J., «Equality of Opportunity: a Progress Report», Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 19, N.º 2, 2002, pp. 455-471.
  • Roemer, J., Equality of Opportunity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA), 1998. Roine, J. y Waldenström, D., «Long-Run Trends in the Distribution of Income and Wealth», IZA Discussion Papers, N.º 8157, 2014.
  • Segall, S., Equality and Opportunity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.
  • Swift, A., Political Philosophy. A Beginner’s Guide for Students and Politicians, 2.ª ed., Polity Press, Cambridge (UK), 2006.
  • Swift, A., «Would Perfect Mobility Be Perfect?», European Sociological Review, Vol. 20, N.º 1, 2004, p. 1-11.
  • Young, M., «Meritocracy Revisited», Society, Vol. 31, N.º 6, 1994, pp. 87-90.
  • Young, M., The Rise of the Meritocracy 1870-2033. An Essay on Education and Equality, Penguin Books, Mitcham (Victoria), 1961.
  • Rawls, J., Justice as Fairness. A Restatement, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA), 2001.