Confidencialidad, privacidad y transparencia en el arbitraje internacional
ISSN: 2346-2442, 0123-4366
Datum der Publikation: 2021
Titel der Ausgabe: Enero-Junio
Nummer: 40
Art: Artikel
Andere Publikationen in: Revista de Derecho Privado
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
Zusammenfassung
In this paper, an analysis of confidentiality, privacy and transparency in international arbitration is carried out, taking into account the urgent need for greater transparency in the arbitration procedure, mainly in investment arbitration. Confidentiality and privacy have always characterized arbitration, primarily international commercial arbitration. However, in the field of investment arbitration, taking into account the strong public interest present in it, the demand for greater transparency in the procedure has become a crucial issue in international arbitration. These questions are the object of study and analysis in the work presented.
Bibliographische Referenzen
- Ajibo, K. I., “La confidencialidad en el arbitraje comercial internacional: suposiciones de la obligación implícita y una propuesta de solución”, Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Comercial Internacional, vol. 3, n.º 2, 2015, 213, 215, 222.
- Amriani, N. y Rika, P. L., “Confidentiality versus transparency of icsid arbitration award: sustainability of the quality practice for good’s governance and investor to support public accountability”, Int. J. Adv. Stu. Hum. Soci. Scie., vol. 2, n.º 2, 2014, 224.
- Barona, S. (coord.), Comentarios a la Ley de Arbitraje, Madrid, Thomson-Civitas, 2004.
- Bhatia, V., Candlin, Ch. y Sharma, R., “Confidentiality and integrity in international commercial arbitration practice”, Arbitration, vol. 75, n.º 1, 2009, 11.
- Brandeis, L. y Sánchez Bravo, G., “‘Amicus curiae’, la trasparencia y la irrupción de la sociedad civil en el arbitraje de inversiones”, Lima Arbitration, n.º 5, 2012/2013, 207.
- Born, G. B., International Commercial Arbitration, vol. ii, The Netherlands, Wolters Kluwer, 2009, 2250-2251, 2280.
- Brown, A. C., “Presumption meets reality: an exploration of the confidentiality obligation in international commercial arbitration”, Am. U. Int’l L. Rev., vol. 16, 2001, 972-975.
- Brown, Ch., “Procedure in investment treaty arbitration and the relevance of comparative public law”, en Schill, S. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford, 2010, 659-660.
- Buys, C. G., “The tensions between confidentiality and transparency in international arbitration”, American International Law Review, vol. 14, 2003, 123.
- Cremades, B. M., “Arbitration between State and investors: some jurisdiction issue”, Business Law International, 2001, 157.
- Cremades, B. M. y Cortés, R., “The principle of confidentiality in arbitration: a necessary crisis”, J. Arb. Stud., vol. 33, 2013, 33-34.
- Douglas, Z., “The hybrid foundations of investment treaty arbitration”, British Yearbook of International Law, n.º 74, 2004, 151-168.
- Dussan, S., “Analysis of the principle of transparency with special reference to its implications for the procedure of international investment arbitration”, Criterio Jurídico, vol. 11, n.º 1, 2011, 107.
- Febles, N., “La transparencia y el interés público en el arbitraje de inversiones”, Vniversitas, vol. 69, en prensa.
- Febles, N., “La regulación de normas sobre la transparencia en los tratados bilaterales de inversión y en la nueva generación de políticas de inversión: una perspectiva comparada”, Revista de Derecho uned, 2019, en prensa.
- Fernández, J. C., “Trayectoria y contornos del mito de la confidencialidad en el arbitraje comercial”, Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, vol. ii, n.º 2, 2009, 335-337.
- Garajová, M., “Privacy and confidentiality in international commercial arbitration under institutional arbitration rules”, en Drličková, K. y Kyselovská, T., Cofola International. Resolution of International Disputes (Conference proceedings), Brno, Masaryk University, 2017, 63.
- Íscar, J., “El arbitraje institucional”, Revista Jurídica de Castilla y León, vol. 29, 2013, 5-6.
- Jiménez, G., “La independencia e imparcialidad del árbitro: algunos aspectos polémicos, mediante una visión ibérica”, Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, vol. viii, n.º 3, 2015, 736-739.
- Knahr, Ch. y August, R., “Transparency versus confidentiality in international investment arbitration. The Biwater Gauff Compromise”, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, vol. 6, 2006, 97-118.
- Merino Merchán, J. F., “Confidencialidad y arbitraje”, Spain Arbitration Review, n.º 2, 2008, 76-95.
- Noussia, K., Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration. A Comparative Analysis of the Position under English, US, German and French Law, Berlin- Heidelberg, Springer, 2010, 1, 22-27.
- Oglindă, B., “The principle of confidentiality in arbitration. Application and limitations of the principle”, Persps. of Bus. L.J, 1, vol. 4, 2015, 57.
- Polanco, R., “Is there a life for Latin American countries after denouncing the icsid Convention?”, Transnational Dispute Management, vol. 11, n.º 1, 2014, 10-23.
- Polanco, R., “Transparencia y derechos de terceros en arbitrajes internacionales sobre inversión extranjera”, Revista de Derecho Económico, Universidad de Chile, n.º 75, 2010, 119.
- Poorooye, A. y Feehily, R., “Confidentiality and transparency in international commercial arbitration: finding the right balance”, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, vol. 22, 2017, 282.
- Silva, E., “Confidencialidad y transparencia en el arbitraje internacional”, Lima Arbitration, n.º 5, 2012/2013, 37, 41, 44-45, 51.
- Smeureanu, I. M., Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, 2011, 5.
- Tweeddale, A. y Tweeddale, K., Arbitration of Commercial Disputes: International and English Law and Practice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, 352.