Ecologías de aprendizaje en estudiantes online con discapacidades

  1. Covadonga Rodrigo 1
  2. Bernardo Tabuenca 2
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03n6nwv02

Revista:
Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación

ISSN: 1134-3478

Any de publicació: 2020

Títol de l'exemplar: Ecologías de aprendizaje en la era digital

Número: 62

Pàgines: 53-65

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.3916/C62-2020-05 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Altres publicacions en: Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

E-Learning environments are enhancing both their functionalities and the quality of the resources provided, thus simplifying the creation of learning ecologies adapted for students with disabilities. The number of students with disabilities enrolled in online courses is so small, and their impairments are so specific that it becomes difficult to quantify and identify which specific actions should be taken to support them. This work contributes to scientific literature with two key aspects: 1) It identifies which barriers these students encounter, and which tools they use to create learning ecologies adapted to their impairments; 2) It also presents the results from a case study in which 161 students with recognised disabilities evaluate the efficiency and ease of use of an online learning environment in higher education studies. The work presented in this paper highlights the need to provide multimedia elements with subtitles, text transcriptions, and the option to be downloadable and editable so that the student can adapt them to their needs and learning style.

€ Mostra el finançament

Informació de finançament

Este trabajo ha sido cofinanciado por la Fundación Vodafone España a través de la Cátedra de “Tecnología y Accesibilidad” (Ref. 1141-P2018)

Finançadors

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Barron B , . 2004. Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research 31(1):1-36
  • Santos-Caamaño F J , González-Sanmamed M , Muñoz-Carril P C , . 2018. El desarrollo de las ecologías de aprendizaje a través de las herramientas en línea. Diálogo Educacional (56) 18
  • Bryant B R , Rao K , Ok M W , . 2014. Universal design for learning and assistive technology. Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice 11-26
  • Carbó-Badal O , Castro-Belmonte M , Latorre-Dena F , . 2017. Red de servicios de apoyo a personas con discapacidad en la universidad. Guía de adaptaciones en la universidad. Prácticas innovadoras inclusivas: Retos y oportunidades.
  • Choi K S , Cho W H , Lee S , Lee H , Kim C , . 2004. The relationships among quality, value, satisfaction and behavioral intention in health care provider choice. Journal of Business Research 57(8):913-921
  • Cronin J J , Taylor S A , . 1992. Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing 56(3)
  • Copper M , . 2006. Making online learning accessible to disabled students: An institutional case study. Research in Learning Technology (1) 14
  • Lancheros-Cuesta D J , Carrillo-Ramos A , . 2012. Modelo de adaptación basado en preferencias en ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje para personas con necesidades especiales. Avances: Investigación en Ingeniería 9(1):111-119
  • Davis F D , Bagozzi R P , Warshaw P R , . 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8):982-1003
  • Díez-Gutiérrez E , Díaz-Nafría J M , . 2018. Ubiquitous learning ecologies for a critical cybercitizenship. [Ecologías de aprendizaje ubicuo para la ciberciudadanía crítica] Comunicar 26:49-58
  • Faraone S V , Biederman J , Micj E , . 2005. The age-dependent decline of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Psychological Medicine 36(2):159-165
  • Fuertes J L , González A L , Mariscal-Vivas G , Ruiz C , . 2005. Herramientas de apoyo a la educación de personas sordas en la universidad española. Enseñanza 430:45-52
  • Fundación Vodafone (Ed.). 2013. Acceso y uso de las TIC por las personas con discapacidad. Conclusiones y resumen ejecutivo.
  • González-Sanmamed M , Sangrà A , Souto-Seijo A , Estévez-Blanco I , . 2018. Ecologías de aprendizaje en la era digital: Desafíos para la educación superior. Publicaciones 48(1)
  • Gutiérrez P , Martorell A , . 2011. People with intellectual disability and ICTs. [Las personas con discapacidad intelectual ante las TIC] Comunicar 18:173-180
  • Jackson N J , . 2013. The concept of learning ecologies. In: Jackson N. , Cooper G.B. , eds. Life-wide learning, education and personal development.
  • Jiménez-Lara A , Huete-García A , . 2016. Informe Olivenza 2016, sobre la situación de la discapacidad en España. In: , ed. Olivenza: Observatorio Estatal de la Discapacidad. 1-698
  • Liaw S S , . 2008. Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the blackboard system. Computers & Education 51(2):864-873
  • Liu I F , Chen M C , Sun Y S , Wible D , Kuo C H , . 2010. Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education 54(2):600-610
  • Luckin R , . 2010. , ed. Re-designing learning contexts. Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. London: Routledge.
  • Luckin R , . 2008. The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning. Computers & Education 50(2):449-462
  • Meyer A , Rose D H , . 2000. Universal design for individual differences. Educational Leadership 58(3):39-43
  • H. Oh, , . 1999. Service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer value: A holistic perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management 18(1):67-82
  • ONCE (Ed.). n.d. Concepto de ceguera y deficiencia visual. Madrid: Organización Nacional de Ciegos Españoles.
  • Perelmutter B , Mcgregor K K , Gordon K R , . 2017. Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education 114:139-163
  • Robles-Gómez A , Ros S , Hernández R , Tobarra L , Caminero A C , Agudo J M , . 2015. User acceptance of a proposed self-evaluation and continuous assessment system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 18(2):97-109
  • Rodríguez-Martín A , . 2017. , ed. Prácticas innovadoras inclusivas: Retos y oportunidades.
  • Romero J F , Cerván R L , . 2006. , ed. Dificultades en el aprendizaje: Unificación de criterios diagnósticos. Sevilla: Sevilla: Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Andalucía.
  • Sanz-Troyano E , Torrente J , Moreno-Ger P , Fernández-Manjón B , . 2010. , ed. Introduciendo criterios de accesibilidad en una herramienta de juegos educativos. Valencia: XI Simposio Nacional de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones en la Educación (SINTICE).
  • Spreng R A , Mackoy R D , . 1996. An empirical examination of a model of perceived service quality and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing 72(2):90014-90021
  • Suh C K , Lee T H , . 2007. User acceptance of e-learning for voluntary studies. In: , ed. 2007 Proceedings of the WSEAS International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications. Gold Coast: Australia. 538-544
  • Sancho J M , . 2008. De TIC a TAC, el difícil tránsito de una vocal. Investigación en la Escuela 64:19-30
  • Tabuenca B , Ternier S , Specht M , . 2013. Supporting lifelong learners to build personal learning ecologies in daily physical spaces. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation 7(3-4):177
  • Tabuenca B , Rodrigo C , . 2019. Representación de ecologías de aprendizaje en estudiantes con discapacidades.
  • Venegas-Sandoval C A , Mansilla-Gómez G M , . 2017. Accesibilidad en web para personas con discapacidad visual. Síntesis Tecnológica 2:1-10
  • Venkatesh V , . 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11(4):342-365
  • Virtanen M A , Haavisto E , Liikanen E , Kääriäinen M , . 2018. Ubiquitous learning environments in higher education: A scoping literature review. Education and Information Technologies 23(2):985-998
  • Williams P , Jamali H R , Nicholas D , . 2006. Using ICT with people with special education needs: What the literature tells us. Aslib Proceedings 58(4):330-345
  • Yi M Y , Hwang Y , . 2003. Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(4):431-449
  • Zubillaga-Del-Río A , Alba-Pastor C , . 2013. Disability in the perception of technology among university students. [La discapacidad en la percepción de la tecnología entre estudiantes universitarios. Comunicar 20:165-172
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet