Calling the Parousia into Question: Doubters and Skeptics in Some Early Christian Texts

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, E. (2005), “‘Where is the Promise of his Coming?’ The Complaint of the Scoffers in 2 Peter 3.4”, in: New Testament Studies 51, 106 – 122.
• Adas, M. (1979), Prophets of Rebellion. Millenarian Protest Movements against the European Colonial Order, Chapel Hill.
• Allison, D. C. (1998), Jesus of Nazareth, Millenarian Prophet, Minneapolis.
• Allison, D. C. (2010), Constructing Jesus. Memory, Imagination, and History, London.
• Allmen, D. von (1966), “L’apocalyptique juive et le retard de la Parousie en II Pierre 3:1 – 13”, in: Revue de Philologie et de Théologie 16, 255 – 274.
• Aune, D. E. (2013), “Christian Beginnings and Cognitive Dissonance Theory,” in: id., Jesus, Gospel Tradition and Paul in the Context of Jewish and Greco-Roman Antiquity. Collected Essays II, Tübingen, 149 – 181.
• Balz, H. and Schrage W. (1973), Die katholischen Briefe, Göttingen.
• Bauckham, R. (1980), “The Delay of the Parousia”, in: Tyndale Bulletin 31, 3 – 33.
• Bermejo-Rubio, F. (2013), “(Why) Was Jesus the Galilean Crucified Alone? Solving a False Conundrum”, in: JSNT 36(2), 127 – 154.
• Bermejo-Rubio, F. (2017), “The Process of Jesus’ Deification and Cognitive Dissonance Theory”, in: Numen 64, 119 – 152.
• Bermejo-Rubio, F. (20214), La invención de Jesús de Nazaret. Historia, ficción, historiografía, Madrid.
• Bigg, Ch. (19752), A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude, Edinburgh (orig. ed. 1901).
• Caulley, Th. S. (2008), “′They Promised Them Freedom’. Once again, the ψευδοδιδάσκαλοι in 2 Peter”, in: ZNW 99, 129 – 138.
• Cohn, N. (1970), The Pursuit of the Millennium: Revolutionary Millenarians and Mystical Anarchists of the Middle Age, London.
• Dawson, L. L. (1999), “When Prophecy Fails and Faith Persists: A Theoretical Overview”, in: Nova Religio 3, 60 – 82.
• DeConick, A. (2005), “Reading the Gospel of Thomas as a Repository of Early Christian Communal Memory,” in: A. Kirk and T. Thatcher, Memory, Tradition, and Text: Uses of the Past in Early Christianity, Boston, 207 – 220.
• Desjardins, M. (1987), “The Portrayal of the Dissidents in 2 Peter and Jude: Does It Tell Us More About the ‘Godly’ Than the ‘Ungodly’?”, in: JSNT 30, 89 – 102.
• Díez Macho, A. (1968), Neophyti 1. Targum Palestinense MS de la Biblioteca Vaticana, Tomo I: Génesis, Madrid/Barcelona.
• Ehrman, B. D. (2013), Forgery and Counterforgery. The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics, Oxford.
• Flusser, D. (1969), “Salvation Present and Future”, in: Numen 16, 139 – 155.
• Fornberg, T. (1977), An Early Church in a Pluralistic Society. A Study of 2 Peter, Uppsala.
• Frey, J. (2009): “Autorfiktion und Gegnerbild im Judasbrief und im Zweiten Petrusbrief,” in: J. Frey, J. Herzer, M. Janßen, Clare K. Rothschild and M. Engelmann (eds), Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen (WUNT 246), Tübingen, 683 – 732.
• Gilmour, M. J. (2002), The Significance of Parallels between 2 Peter and Other Early Christian Literature, Leiden.
• Harland, P. J. (1996), The Value of Human Life. A Study of the Story of the Flood (Genesis 6 – 9), Leiden.
• Isenberg, S. (1970), “An Anti-Sadducee Polemic in the Palestinian Targum Tradition”, in: HTR 63, 433 – 444.
• Leaney, A. R. C. (1967), The Letters of Peter and Jude, Cambridge.
• Most, G. (2009), Doubting Thomas, Cambridge, MA.
• Neyrey, J. H. (1980), “The Apologetic Use of the Transfiguration in II Peter 1.16 – 21”, in: CBQ 42, 504 – 519.
• Neyrey, J. H. (1980a), “The Form and Background of the Polemic in II Peter”, in: JBL 99, 407 – 443.
• Talbert, Ch. M. (1966), “II Peter and the Delay of the Parousia”, in: VigChr 20, 137 – 145.
• Weiss, J. (1892), Die Predigt Jesu vom Reiche Gottes, Göttingen.