El legado feminista de John Dewey

  1. Vaamonde Gamo, Marta 1
  2. Nubiola, Jaime 2
  1. 1 IES Brianda de Mendoza / Centro Asociado Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia – Guadalajara
  2. 2 Universidad de Navarra
    info

    Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02rxc7m23

Revista:
Espacio, Tiempo y Educación

ISSN: 2340-7263

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: John Dewey’s Reception and Influence in Europe and America

Volumen: 3

Número: 2

Páginas: 281-300

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14516/ETE.2016.003.002.012 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Espacio, Tiempo y Educación

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This article demonstrates how feminism welcomed and was influenced by the pragmatism of John Dewey. While in real terms his impact on European feminism has been minimal, this was not the case in contemporary America. In this article we study both how Dewey’s ideas were received amongst American feminists, as well as certain aspects of his thinking that could be enormously useful in present-day debates between critical and postmodern feminists. We compare the Deweyan and feminist arguments against the traditional dualisms that acted as philosophical support for social inequality, paying particular attention to mind–body dualism, and the consequent undervaluation of physical and emotional wellbeing. We also show that John Dewey’s proposals were, in fact, more radical than those of the feminists of the day. Indeed, democracy has to be understood as a way of life that affects every dimension of experience, and is crucial to the personal and social growth that enables the unjust social inequalities between men and women to be overcome.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Addams, J. (2001). A Toast to John Dewey. In Seigfried, Ch. H. (Ed.), Feminist Interpretation of John Dewey (pp. 25-30). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Benhabib, S. (2006). El ser y el otro en la ética contemporánea. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  • Benhabib, S. (2011). Dignity in Adversity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., & Fraser, N., (Eds.). (2011). Feminist Contentions. New York: Routledge.
  • Benhabib, S., & Cornell, D. (Eds.). (1990). Teoría feminista y teoría crítica, Valencia: Alfons el Magnànim.
  • Bernstein, R. (1992). The Resurgence of Pragmatism. Social Research, 59, 813-840.
  • Bernstein, R. (2010). Dewey’s Vision of Radical Democracy. In Cochran, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Dewey (pp. 288-308). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Birke, L. (2000). Biological Sciences. In Jaggar, A., & Young, I. (Eds.), A Companion to Feminist Philosophy (pp. 194-203). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Blanco, R. (1996) Un clásico del siglo XX: J. Dewey. Revista de Educación, 311, 397-407.
  • Bradwell-Jones, C., & Hamington, M. (2012). Contemporary Feminist Pragmatism. New York: Routledge.
  • Dewey, J. (1886). Health and Sex in Higher Education. In Boydston, J. A. (Ed.). (1996), The Early Works of John Dewey (vol. I, pp. 69-80). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1911). Is Co-education Injurious to Girls? In Boydston, J. A. (Ed.). (1996), The Middle Works of John Dewey (vol. VI, pp. 155-164). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. In Boydston, J. A. (Ed.). (1996), The Middle Works of John Dewey (vol. IX, pp. 1-393). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and its Problems. In Boydston, J. A. (Ed.). (1996), The Later Works of John Dewey (vol. II, 237-373). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1930). From Absolutism to Experimentalism. In Boydston, J. A. (Ed.). (1996), The Later Works of John Dewey (vol. V, 147-160). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Dewey, J. (2004). Democracia y educación. Traducción de Lorenzo Luzuriaga. Madrid: Morata, (6ª ed.).
  • Droeger, P. (2001). Reclaiming the Subject, or A View from Here. In Seigfried, Ch. H. (Ed.), Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey (pp. 160-185). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Dykhuizen, G. (1974). The Life and Mind of John Dewey. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Fraser, N. (1990). Solidarity or Singularity? Richard Rorty between Romanticism and Technocracy. In Malachowski, A. (Ed.), Reading Rorty (pp. 303-322). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Fraser, N. (2011). False Antitheses: A Response to Seyla Benhabib and Judith Butler. In Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., & Fraser, N. (Eds.), Feminist Contentions (pp. 59-75). New York: Routledge.
  • Fraser, N. (2011b). Pragmatism, Feminism, and the Linguistic Turn. In Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., & Fraser, N. (Eds.), Feminist Contentions (pp. 157-171). New York: Routledge.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Green, J. (2001). Deepening Democratic Transformation. Deweyan Individuation and Pragmatist Feminism. In Seigfried, Ch. (Ed.), Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey (pp. 260-277). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Irigaray, L. (1994). Speculum, espéculo de la otra mujer. Madrid: Saltés.
  • Jaggar, A. M., & Bordo, S. (1989) Introduction to Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstruction of Being and Knowing. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • McKenna, E. (2012). Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Women, Animals, and Oppression. In Hamington, M., & Bardwell-Jones, C. (Eds.), Contemporary Feminist Pragmatism (pp. 238-254). New York: Routledge
  • Menand, L. (2002). El club de los metafísicos. Barcelona: Destino.
  • Minnich, E. (2001). Philosophy, Education, and the American Tradition of Aspirational Democracy. In Seigfried, Ch. H. (Ed.), Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey (pp. 95-112). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Moreno, M. (2013). La dictadura franquista y la represión de las mujeres. In Nash, M. (Ed.), Represión, resistencias, memoria. Las mujeres bajo la dictadura franquista. Granada: Comares.
  • Nubiola, J., (2005). The Reception of Dewey in the Hispanic World. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 24, 437-453.
  • Nubiola, J. (2011). Raíces pragmatistas de la filosofía analítica. Sapientia, 67, 111-126.
  • Posada Kubissa, L. (2005). La diferencia sexual como diferencia esencial: sobre Luce Irigaray. In Amorós, C., & De Miguel, A. (Eds.), Teoría feminista: de la Ilustración a la globalización (vol. 2, pp. 253-288). Madrid: Minerva.
  • Rodríguez Espinosa, G. (2002). Consecuencias del neopragmatismo: el aspecto crítico de Richard Rorty, Tesis doctoral Universidad de La Laguna. Recuperado el 3 de enero del 2016, de ftp://tesis.bbtk.ull.es/ccssyhum/cs148.pdf.
  • Rorty, R. (1990). Feminism and Pragmatism. In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (pp. 1-35). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
  • Rumens, N., & Kelemen, M. (2010). American Pragmatism and Feminism: Fresh Opportunities for Sociological Inquiry. Contemporary Pragmatism, 7(1), 129-148.
  • Seigfried, Ch. (1991). Where Are All the Pragmatic Feminists? Hypatia, 6, 1-20.
  • Seigfried, Ch. (1999). Socializing Democracy: Jane Addams and John Dewey. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29, 207-229.
  • Seigfried, Ch. (2001). Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Sullivan, S. (2001). The Need for Truth. Toward a Pragmatist-Feminist Standpoint Theory. In Seigfried, Ch. (Ed.), Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey (pp. 210-235). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Sullivan, S. (2007). Intersections Between Pragmatism and Continental Feminism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1-19). Recuperado el 4 de enero de 2016, de http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/femapproach-prag-cont/
  • Thayer-Bacon, B. (2012). Education’s Role in Democracy. In Hamington, M., & Bardwell-Jones, C. (Eds.), Contemporary Feminist Pragmatism (pp. 143-163). New York: Routledge.
  • Vaamonde Gamo, M. (2015). Debate feminista contemporáneo. Aportaciones de John Dewey. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
  • Vázquez, R. (2012). La Residencia de Señoritas de Madrid durante la II República: entre la alta cultura y el brillo social. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 2(1), 323-346.
  • Westbrook, R. (2010). The Making of a Democratic Philosopher. In Cochran, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Dewey (pp. 13-33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Young, I. M. (1986). The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference. Social Theory and Practice, 12(1), 1-26 .
  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet