The effect size in scientific publication

  1. Esther López-Martín 1
  2. Diego Ardura 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Revista:
Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1139-613X 2174-5374

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 26

Número: 1

Páginas: 9-17

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/EDUCXX1.36276 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Referencias bibliográficas

  • American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X03500603
  • Bakker, A., Cai, J., English, L., Kaiser, G. y Mesa, V. Beyond small, medium, or large: points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 1–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4
  • Blanco Blanco, A. (2018). Estado de las prácticas científicas e investigación educativa. Posibles retos para la próxima década. Revista de Educación, (381), 207-232.
  • https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-381-386
  • Boring, E. (1919). Mathematical vs. scientific importance. Psychological Bulletin, 16(10), 335-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074554
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2st ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Farmus, L., Beribisky, N., Martinez Gutierrez, N., Alter, U., Panzarella, E., & Cribbie, R.
  • A. (2022). Effect size reporting and interpretation in social personality research. Current Psychology, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02621-7
  • Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
  • García, J. G., Campos, E. O., & De la Fuente Sánchez, L. (2011). The use of the effect size in JCR Spanish Journals of Psychology: From theory to fact. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 1050-1055. http://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011. v14.n2.49
  • Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
  • Hyde, J. S. (2001). Reporting effect sizes: The roles of editors, textbook authors, and publication manuals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 225-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401612005
  • Huberty, C., & Morris, J.D. (1988). A single contrast test procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(3), 567-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164488483001
  • Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056005002
  • McFadden, D. (1977). Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Travel Behaviour of Individuals: Some Recent Developments. Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 474, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University. https://cowles.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/pub/d04/d0474.pdf
  • Morse, D. T. (1999). MINSIZE2: A computer program for determining effect size and minimum sample size for statistical significance for univariate, multivariate, and nonparametric tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(3), 518-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921969901
  • Panzarella, E., Beribisky, N., & Cribbie, R. A. (2021). Denouncing the use of fieldspecific effect size distributions to inform magnitude. PeerJ, 9, e11383. https://doi.org./10.7717/peerj.11383
  • Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087427
  • Student (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331554
  • Sun, S., Pan, W., & Wang, L. L. (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019507
  • Thompson, B. (1996). Research news and comment: AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25(2), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025002026
  • Thompson, B. (2006). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. Guilford Publications.
  • Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in sport sciences, 1(21), 19-25.
  • Volker, M. A. (2006). Reporting effect size estimates in school psychology research. Psychology in the Schools, 43(6), 653-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20176
  • Wei, R., Hu, Y., & Xiong, J. (2019). Effect size reporting practices in applied linguistics research: A study of one major journal. SAGE Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019850035
  • Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference, American Psychological Association, Science Directorate. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594