Restorative Justice Education from Intrajudicial Criminal Mediation Associated Factors

  1. Mercedes Matás Castillo 1
  2. Inmaculada Méndez 1
  3. Cecilia Ruiz Esteban 1
  4. Gloria Soto 2
  1. 1 Department of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, University of Murcia
  2. 2 Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis in Education, University of Murcia
Revista:
EJIHPE: European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education

ISSN: 2174-8144,  2254-9625

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 11

Número: 3

Páginas: 627-638

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3390/EJIHPE11030045 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: EJIHPE: European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The restorative justice (RJ) paradigm requires coherence among legal, justice, and educational systems to promote a culture of restorative dialogue with victims of violence and to reintegrate aggressors into the community. The objective of this study, from an evolutionary social perspective, was to examine criminal mediation files in the archives of the Murcia Intrajudicial Criminal Mediation Service (UMIM), Spain, to see which variables are associated with which types of violence and understand the contents and adoption of agreements. In this study the sociodemographic, procedural, and interpersonal variables of 216 people who used criminal mediation were analysed. The results showed statistically significant differences concerning age, the procedural moment of referral, and the participants’ relationship. The main conclusions are that the youngest group had a more significant number of encounters with physical violence; most agreements occurred in the initial phase of a judicial procedure; and the majority of agreements had moral content regardless of the age of the parties involved. These factors are of interest to the establishment of judicial and educational restorative models.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes, 2nd ed.; UNODC: Vienna, Austria, 2020.
  • UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). Handbook of Basic Principles and Promising Practices on Alternatives to Imprisonment; UNODC: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  • UNO. Resolución 217 (III)/48, de 10 de Diciembre, de la Asamblea General; sobre Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos: New York, NY, USA, 1948.
  • Banks, J.A. Failed citizenship and Transformative civic education. Educ. Res. 2017, 46, 366–377.
  • Braithwaite, J. Does restorative justice work? In A Restorative Justice Reader: Texts, Sources, Context; Johnstone, G., Ed.; Willan Publishing: Devon, UK, 2003; pp. 320–352.
  • Braithwaite, J. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation: The question of evidence. RegNet Res. Paper 2016, 51, 32.
  • Domingo de la Fuente, V. ¿Qué es Justicia Restaurativa? Criminología y Justicia 2012, 4, 6–11.
  • Shapland, J.; Robinson, G.; Sorsby, A. Restorative Justice in practice. In Evaluating What Works for Victims and Offenders; Routledge: Oxon, UK, 2011.
  • Van Camp, T. Understanding victim participation in restorative practices: Looking for justice for oneself as well as for others. Eur. J. Criminol. 2017, 14, 679–696.
  • UNO. Promover la Justicia Restaurativa para Niñas; niños y adolescentes: New York, NY, USA, 2016.
  • Landecho, C.; Molina, C. Derecho Penal Español. Parte General, 11th ed.; Tecnos: Madrid, Spain, 2020.
  • Maynard, N.; Weinstein, B. Hacking School Discipline. 9 Ways to Create a Culture of Empathy & Responsibility Usisng Restorative Justice; Times 10: Highland Heights, OH, USA, 2020.
  • Hollweck, T.; Reimer, K.; Bouchard, K. A Missing Piece: Embedding Restorative Justice and Relational Pedagogy into the Teacher Education Classroom. New Educ. 2019, 15, 246–267.
  • Braithwaite, J. The fundamentals of restorative. In A Kind of Mending: Restorative Justice in the Pacific Islands; Dinen, S., Jowit, A., Newton, T., Eds.; Australian National University Press: Canberra, Australia, 2010; pp. 35–43.
  • Boyce, A. A re-imagining of evaluation as social justice: A discussion of the Education Justice Project. Crit. Educ. 2019, 10, 1–19.
  • Braithwaite, J. The future of restorative justice. In Routledge International Handbook of Restorative Justice; Routledge: Oxon, UK, 2018; pp. 29–31. [
  • Zehr, H. The Little Book of Restorative Justice: Updated and Revised; Good Books: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
  • Soleto, H.; Grané, A. El proceso penal, mecanismo ineficaz de compensación a la víctima: Un estudio de campo. Int. Rev. Vict. 2018, 8, 35–81.
  • Defensor del Pueblo. Retrasos en la Administración de Justicia. In Separata del Volumen II del Informe Anual 2018; Defensor del Pueblo: Madrid, Spain, 2019.
  • Cornelio Landero, E. Los mecanismos alternativos de soluciones de controversias como derecho humano. Barataria. Rev. Castellano-Manch. Ciencias Soc. 2014, 17, 81–95.
  • Subijana, I.J. El paradigma de humanidad en la Justicia Restaurativa. Eguzkilore 2012, 26, 143–153.
  • UNO. Resolución 53/243, de 13 de Septiembre; de la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas sobre Declaración y Programa de Acción sobre una Cultura de Paz: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
  • European Union. Recommendation (UE) 2018/8 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning Restorative Justice in Criminal Matters. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 October 2018 at the 1326th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies. Available online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/prison/newsroom/-/asset_publisher/hHl00rQ4BQQt/content/recommendation-cm-rec-2018-8?_101_INSTANCE_hHl00rQ4BQQt_viewMode=view/ (accessed on 27 February 2020).
  • Wachtel, T. Definiendo qué es Restaurativo. Instituto Internacional de Prácticas Restaurativas 2013. Available online: www.iirp.edu (accessed on 9 January 2021).
  • Caamaño, N.; Díaz, S.; Luna, M.; Salazar, P. Mediación y justicia restaurativa en una cultura de educación para la paz. J. Hum. Sci. 2020, 47, 98–106.
  • Gregory, A.; Evans, K.R. The Starts and Stumbles of Restorative Justice in Education: Where Do We Go from Here? National Education Policy Center: Boulder, CO, USA, 2020.
  • Kana‘iaupuni, S.M.; Ledward, B.; Malone, N. Mohala i ka wai: Cultural Advantage as a Framework for Indigenous Culture-Based Education and Student Outcomes. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2017, 54, 311S–339S.
  • UNO. Resolución 61/299, de 29 de Agosto, de la Asamblea General, para el Informe Mundial Sobre Violencia Contra Niños y las Niñas; del Secretario General de las Naciones Unidas: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  • Aranda, M. La promoción de la Justicia Restaurativa en materia penal por Naciones Unidas a través de sus Congresos Internacionales. Rev. Boliv. Derecho 2019, 27, 552–575.
  • Unión Europea. Directiva (UE) 2012/29 del Consejo, de 25 de Octubre, por la que se Establecen Normas Mínimas Sobre los Derechos, el Apoyo y la Protección de las Víctimas de Delitos, y por la que se Sustituye la Decisión Marco 2001/220/JAI del Consejo. D. O. L 315, 14 de Noviembre de 2012, pp. 57–73. Available online: https://www.boe.es/doue/2012/315/L00057-00073.pdf (accessed on 11 March 2021).
  • UNESCO. Behind the Numbers: Ending School Violence and Bullying; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2019.
  • UNESCO. Let´s Decide How to Measure School Violence; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2017.
  • UNESCO. Glogal Guidance on Addressing School-Related Gender-Based Violence; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France; UN Women: New York, NY, USA, 2016.
  • Cerezo, F.; Méndez, I.; Ato, M. Moderating role of family and friends’ factors between disocial behavior and consumption in adolescents. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2013, 13, 171–180.
  • Pérez-Fuentes, M.C.; Álvarez-Bermejo, J.A.; Molero, M.M.; Gázquez, J.J.; López Vicente, M.A. Violencia Escolar y Rendimiento Académico (VERA): Aplicación de realidad aumentada. Eur. J. Educ. Psychol. 2011, 1, 71–84.
  • Amnistía Internacional. Informe. Hacer la vista … Gorda!: El Acoso Escolar en España, un Asunto de Derechos Humanos; Amnistía Internacional: London, UK, 2019.
  • Schouw, J.; Verkes, R.; Schene, A.; Schellenkes, A. The relationship between childhood adversity and adult personality revealed by network analysis. Child Abuse Negl. 2020, 99, 104254.
  • Ttofi, M.M.; Farrington, D.P.; Lösel, F. School bullying as a predictor of violence later in a life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2012, 17, 405–418.
  • UNESCO. Reunión Global Sobre la Educación 2020 Sesión Extraordinaria sobre Educación Post COVID-19 (online). Co-Organizada por los Gobiernos de Ghana, Noruega, el Reino Unido y la UNESCO 20 de Octubre de 2020, 13:00–16:00 (CEST-Paris) 22 de Octubre de 2020, 13:00–15:00 (CEST-Paris). 2020. Available online: https://es.unesco.org/news/educacion-post-covid-19-sesion-extraordinaria-reunion-global-educacion-2020 (accessed on 13 March 2021).
  • Reyes-Quilodrán, C.; Labrenz, C.A.; Donoso-Morales, G. Justicia Restaurativa en Sistemas de Justicia Penal Juvenil Comparado: Suecia, Inglaterra, Italia y Chile. Política Crim. 2018, 13, 626–649.
  • Miguel, C.; Gargano, J. Moving beyond Retribution: Alternatives to punishment in a Society dominated by the School to Prison pipeline. Humanities 2017, 6, 15.
  • UNESCO. Rendir Cuentas en el Ámbito de la Educación: Cumplir Nuestros Compromisos; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2017.
  • Machimbarrena, J.M.; González Cabrera, J.; Garaigordobil, M. Variables familiares relacionadas con el bullying y el cyberbullying. Una revisión sistemática. Pensamiento Psicológico 2019, 17, 37–56.
  • Méndez, I.; Jorquera, A.B.; Ruiz-Esteban, C.; Martínez-Ramón, J.P.; Fernández-Sogorb, A. Emotional Intelligence, bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescents. In. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4837.
  • Méndez, I.; Liccardi, G.; Ruiz-Esteban, C. Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement used to Justify School Violence in Sicilian Primary School. Eur. J. Educ. Psychol. 2020, 10, 682–691.
  • Silva, J.L.D.; Oliveira, W.A.D.; Mello, F.C.M.D.; Andrade, L.S.D.; Bazon, M.R.; Silva, M.A.I. Anti-bullying interventions in schools: A systematic literatura review. Cienc. Saude Coletiva 2017, 22, 2329–2340.
  • Sainio, M.; Herkama, S.; Turunen, T.; Röonkköo, R.; Kontio, M.; Poskiparta, E.; Salmivalli, C. Sustainable antibullying program implementation: School profiles and predictors. Scand. J. Psychol. 2020, 61, 132–142.
  • Nieto, B.; Portela, I.; López, E.; Domínguez, V. Violencia verbal en el alumnado de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Eur. J. Educ. Psychol. 2018, 8, 5–14.
  • Galtung, J. La violencia: Cultural, estructural y directa. Cuadernos de Estrategia 2016, 183, 147–168.
  • Sellman, E. Peer mediation services for conflict resolution in schools: What transformations in activity characterise successful implementation? Brit. Educ. Res. J. 2011, 37, 45–60.
  • Ury, W. Alcanzar la Paz, 1st ed.; Paidós: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2005. (In Spanish)
  • Bickmore, K. Policies and Programming for Safer Schools: Are “Anti-bullying” Approaches Impeding Education for Peacebuilding? Educ. Policy 2011, 25, 648–687.
  • Frías-Armenta, M.; Rodríguez-Macías, J.C.; Corral-Verdugo, V.; Caso-Niebla, J.; García-Arizmendi, V. Restorative Justice: A model of School violence prevention. Sci. Educ. 2018, 6, 39–45.
  • Albertí, M.; Boqué, C. Hacia una pedagogía restaurativa: Superación del modelo punitivo en el ámbito escolar. Rev. Mediación 2015, 8, 36–49.
  • González, T.; Sattler, H.; Buth, A.J. New directions in whole-school restorative justice implementation. Confl. Resolut. Q. 2019, 36, 207–220.
  • Resolución de 13 de Noviembre de 2017, de la Dirección General de Atención a la Diversidad y Calidad Educativa, por la que se Dictan Instrucciones para la Mejora de la Convivencia Escolar en los Centros Educativos no Universitarios Sostenidos Con fondos Públicos de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia. Available online: https://www.carm.es/web/pagina?IDCONTENIDO=4105&IDTIPO=100&RASTRO=c792$m4001 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  • Anderson, K.; Ritter, G.; Zamarro, G. Understanding a vicious cycle: The relationschip between student discipline and student academic outcomes. Educ. Res. 2019, 48, 251–262.
  • Soto-Vigil, D. Education Policy Networks: The Co-optation, coordination, and commodification of the School-to-Prison pipeline critique. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2020, 57, 371–410.
  • Snodgrass, V.; Hein, S.; Rotramel, C.; Marquez, B. A Researcher-Practicioner Agenda for Studiying and Supporting Youth Reentering School After Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System. Educ. Res. 2020, 49, 212–219.
  • Swanson, E.; Holmes Erickson, H.; Ritter, G.W. Examining the Impacts of Middle School Disciplinary Policies on 9th Grade Retention. Educ. Policy 2017.
  • Giménez-Salinas, E.; Salensch, S.; Toro, L. Spain. In Restorative Justice and Mediation in Penal Matters. A Stock-Taking of Legal Issues, Implementation Strategies and Outcomes in 36 European Countries; Dünkel, F., Grzywa-Holten, J., Horsfield, P., Eds.; Forum Verlag Godesberg: Mönchengladbach, Germany, 2015; Volume 2, pp. 875–916.
  • Ley Orgánica 5/2000, de 12 de Enero, Reguladora de la Responsabilidad Penal de los Menores. Boletín Oficial del Estado. 2000. Available online: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2000-641 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  • Estrella, A.M. Mediación penal de adultos intrajudicial: Propuestas a la luz de la experiencia legal portuguesa y de experiencias piloto españolas. Revista Aranzadi de Derecho y Proceso Penal 2017, 47, 43–71.
  • Olalde, A.J. La percepción de los equipos de justicia restaurativa del servicio de mediación intrajudicial de Euskadi sobre el protocolo de funcionamiento. Oñati Socio-Legal Series Online 2019, 9, 494–518.
  • Ríos Martín, J.C.; Pascual Rodríguez, E.; Sánchez Álvarez, P.; Garrido, R.M.; García Canales, J.; Guillén, A.B.; Lozano, F.; Pascual, R.; Moreno, F.; Cuñarro, C.; et al. Justicia Restaurativa. Análisis de una Experiencia de Mediación Penal en los Órganos Jurisdiccionales de Madrid (2005–2008); Servicio de Planificación y Análisis de la Actividad Judicial del Consejo General del Poder Judicial: Madrid, Spain, 2008; Available online: https://www.cgpj.es (accessed on 9 October 2020).
  • Government of the Superior Court of Justice of the Region of Murcia: Report of the Superior Court of Justice of Murcia 2019, Government File 437/2020. Available online: https://www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Poder-Judicial/Tribunales-Superiores-de-Justicia/TSJ-Region-de-Murcia/Actividad-del-TSJ-Region-de-Murcia/Memoria-Judicial/Memoria-del-Tribunal-Superior-de-Justicia-de-Murcia-2019 (accessed on 11 March 2021).
  • Ley Orgánica 4/2015, de 27 de Abril, del Estatuto de la Víctima del Delito. 27 de Abril. Boletín Oficial del Estado. 2015. Available online: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2015-4606 (accessed on 11 March 2021).
  • Ríos Martín, J.C. Justicia restaurativa y mediación penal. Icade. Rev. Fac. Derecho 2016, 98, 103–126.
  • Welsh, R.O.; Little, S. The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Rev. Educ. Res. 2018, 88, 752–794.
  • Ley Orgánica 6/1985, de 1 de julio, del Poder Judicial. Boletín Oficial del Estado. 1985. Available online: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1985-12666 (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  • Castillejo, R. Estado de la mediación penal en España. Iuris. Tantum. 2019, 29, 99–142.
  • Smith, L.; Garnett, B.; Herbert, A.; Grudev, N.; Vogel, J.; Keefner, W.; Barnett, A.; Baker, T. The Hand of Professional School Counseling Meets the Glove of Restorative Practices: A Call to the Profession l2. Prof. Sch. Couns. 2018, 21, 1–10.
  • Ratts, M.J.; Greenleaf, A. Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competences: A leadership framework for profesional school counselors. Prof. Sch. Couns. 2018, 21, 1–9.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet