Is photography really limited in its capacity to communicate thought? A response to Hopkin

  1. Atencia Linares, Paloma 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
    info

    Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

    Ciudad de México, México

    ROR https://ror.org/01tmp8f25

Aldizkaria:
Laocoonte : revista de estética y teoría de las artes

ISSN: 2386-8449

Argitalpen urtea: 2018

Zenbakien izenburua: Número 5

Zenbakia: 5

Orrialdeak: 83-96

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.7203/LAOCOONTE.0.5.12391 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Laocoonte : revista de estética y teoría de las artes

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

In The Real Challenge to Photography (as a communicative representational art), Robert Hopkins claims that a particular and significant kind of photography – what he calls ‘authentic’ photography – cannot exploit the same range of resources as non-photographic images when it comes to communicating thoughts. In this paper, I question this claim by raising concerns regarding the conditions Hopkins poses for something to qualify as communication of thoughtand, more importantly, by arguing that there are indeed techniques in ‘authentic’ photography that allow the artist to exploit the vehicle properties of the medium independently of the content