Executive Functions and Improvement of ThinkingAn Intervention Program to Enhance Deductive Reasoning Abilities

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. (2017). Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 607–617. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.004
• Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16(1), 17–42. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x
• Ariës, R. J., Ghysels, J., Groot, W., & van den Brink, H Maassen. (2017). Does n-back training in a school-based context improve reasoning? A literature review. TIER Working Paper Series 17/08, 1–17.
• Ariës, R. J., Groot, W., & van den Brink, H. M. (2014). Improving reasoning skills in secondary history education by working memory training. British Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3142
• Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought and action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001
• Baddeley, A. D. (2010). Long-term and working memory: How do they interact? In Bäckman, L. & Nyberg, L. (Eds.), Memory, aging and the brain: A festschrift in honor of Lars-Göran Nilsson (pp. 18–30). Psychology Press.
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8., pp. 47–89). Academic Press. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
• Baggetta, P., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Conceptualization and operationalization of executive function. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(1), 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12100
• Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic? Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90–109. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014
• Bago, B., Raoelison, M., & De Neys, W. (2019). Second-guess: Testing the specificity of error detection in the bat-and-ball problem. Acta Psychologica, 193, 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.008
• Barnes, J. J., Woolrich, M. W., Baker, K., Colclough, G. L., & Astle, D. E. (2016). Electrophysiological measures of resting state functional connectivity and their relationship with working memory capacity in childhood. Developmental Science, 19(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12297
• Barrouillet, P., & Lecas, J.-F. (1999). Mental models in conditional reasoning and working memory. Thinking & Reasoning, 5(4), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467899393940
• Barrouillet, P., Grosset, N., & Lecas, J.-F. (2000). Conditional reasoning by mental models: Chronometric and developmental evidence. Cognition, 75(3), 237–266. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00066-4
• Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2014). Closing the achievement gap through modification of neurocognitive and neuroendocrine function: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of an innovative approach to the education of children in kindergarten. PLoS ONE, 9(11), Article e112393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112393
• Blakemore, S.-J., & Frith, U. (2005). The learning brain. Lesson for education. Blackwell Publishing.
• Braine, M. D. S., & O’Brien, D. P. (1998). The theory of mental-propositional logic: Description and illustration. In Braine, M. D. S., O’Brien, D. P., & Braine, M. (Eds.), Mental logic (pp.79–89). Psychology Press. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603005-9
• Camos, V., & Barrouillet, P. (2018). Working memory in domain-specific developmental theories. In Camos, V. & Barrouillet, P. (Eds.), Working memory in development (pp. 56–76). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315660851-3
• Capon, A., Handley, S., & Dennis, I. (2003). Working memory and reasoning: An individual differences perspective. Thinking & Reasoning, 9(3), 203–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546781343000222
• Carretti, B., Borella, E., Elosúa, M. R., Gómez-Veiga, I., & García-Madruga, J. A. (2017). Improvements in reading comprehension performance after a training program focusing on executive processes of working memory. Journal of Cognitive Enhance, 1, 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0012-9
• Cheng, P. W., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Oliver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 293–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90002-2
• Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
• Christoforides, M, Spanoudis, G., & Demetriou, A. (2016). Coping with logical fallacies: A developmental training program for learning to reason. Child Development, 87(6), 1856–1876. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12557
• Cummings, J. L. (1993). Frontal subcortical circuits and human behavior. Archives of Neurology, 50, 873–880. http://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1993.00540080076020
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
• Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001
• De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429354
• De Neys, W. (Ed.). (2018). Dual process theory 2.0. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204550
• De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106(3), 1248–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002
• De Neys, W., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Logic, fast and slow: Advances in dual-process theorizing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 503–509. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419855658
• Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
• Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2016). Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005
• Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2020). Review of the evidence on, and fundamental questions about, efforts to improve executive functions, including working memory. In Novick, J. M., Bunting, M. F., Dougherty, M. R., & Engle, R. W. (Eds.), Cognitive and working memory training (pp. 143–431). Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199974467.003.0008
• Dunning, D. L., Holmes, J., & Gathercole, S. E. (2013). Does working memory training lead to generalized improvements in children with low working memory? A randomized controlled trial. Developmental Science, 16(6), 915–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12068
• Duque de Blas, G., Gómez-Veiga, I., & García-Madruga, J. A. (2021). Arithmetic word problems revisited: Cognitive processes and academic performance in secondary school. Education Sciences, 11(4), Article 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040155
• Engle, R. W. (2001). What is working memory capacity? In Roediger, H. L III, Naime, J. S., Neath, I., & Supremant, A. M. (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 297–314). American Psychological Association. http://doi.org/10.1037/10394-016
• Evans, J., & Over, D. (2004). If. Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525134.001.0001
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Biases in human reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
• Evans, J. St. B. T. (2012). How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? In Evans, J. St. B. T & Frankish, K. (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 33–54). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0002 (Original work published 2009).
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Lynch, J. S. (1973). Matching bias in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01365.x
• Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
• Fangmeier, T., Knauff, M., Ruff, C. C., & Sloutsky, V. (2006). fMRI evidence for a three-stage model of deductive reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(3), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.3.320
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
• Fuster, J. M. (1989). The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, physiology and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe (2nd Ed.). Raven Press.
• García-Madruga, J. A. (1982). Razonamiento silogístico e interpretación de premisas: Un estudio evolutivo [Syllogistic reasoning and interpretation of premises: A developmental study]. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 5, 175–204. http://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.1982.10821951
• García Madruga, J. A. (1983). Un modelo general sobre el razonamiento silogístico: Doble procesamiento y fase de comprobación con verificación [A general model on syllogistic reasoning: double processing and verification phase]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 38(3), 439–466.
• García-Madruga, J. A., Elosúa, M. R., Gil, L., Gómez-Veiga, I., Vila, J. Ó., Orjales, I., Contreras, A., Rodríguez, R., Melero, M. A., & Duque, G. (2013). Reading comprehension and working memory’s executive processes: An intervention study in primary school students. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(82), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.44
• García-Madruga, J. A., Gómez-Veiga, I., & Vila, J. O. (2016). Executive functions and the improvement of thinking abilities: The intervention in reading comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00058
• García-Madruga, J. A., Gutiérrez, F., Carriedo, N., Luzón, J. M., & Vila, J. O. (2007). Mental models in propositional reasoning and working memory’s central executive. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(4), 370–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780701203813
• Gathercole, S. E., Dunning, D. L., Holmes, J., & Norris, D. (2019). Working memory training involves learning new skills. Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 19–42. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.10.003
• Gilhooly, K. J., Logie, R. H., & Wynn, V. (1999). Syllogistic reasoning tasks, working memory, and skill. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11(4), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/095414499382264
• Gobet, F., & Sala, G. (2022). Cognitive training: A field in search of a phenomenon. Psychological Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221091830
• Gómez-Chacón, I. M., García-Madruga, J. A., Vila, J. S., Elosúa, M. R., & Rodríguez, R. (2014). The dual processes hypothesis in mathematics performance: Beliefs, cognitive reflection, working memory and reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 67–73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.001
• Gómez-Veiga, I., Vila Chaves, J. O., Duque, G., & García-Madruga, J. A. (2018). A new look to a classic issue: Reasoning and academic achievement at secondary school. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00400
• Gottfried, A. E. (2019). Academic intrinsic motivation. Theory, assessment and longitudinal research. Advances in Motivation Science, 6, 71–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2018.11.001
• Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Evidence for an inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00148
• Houdé, O., Zago, L., Mellet, E., Moutier, S., Pineau, A., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2000). Shifting from the perceptual brain to the logical brain: The neural impact of cognitive inhibition training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900562525
• Im-Bolter, N., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2006). Processing limitations in children with specific language impairment: The role of executive function. Child Development, 77, 1822–1841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00976.x
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1955). De la logique de l’enfant à la logique de l’adolescent [From the logic of the child to the logic of the adolescent]. Presses Universitaires de France.
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). A taxonomy of thinking. In Sternberg, R. J. & Smith, E. E. (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 429–457). Cambridge University Press.
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1990). The development of reasoning ability. In Butterworth, G. & Bryant, P. (Eds.), Causes of development: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 85–110). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012). How we reason. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551330.001.0001 (Original published in 2008).
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2015). How to improve thinking. In Wegerif, R., Li, L., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking. Routledge.
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. (1991). Deduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M., & Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99(3), 418–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.418
• Jurado, M. B., & Rosselli, M. (2007). The elusive nature of executive functions: A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychology Review, 17(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-007-9040-z
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus & Giroux. https://doi.org/10.1086/674372
• Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004
• Karbach, J., & Unger, K. (2014). Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 390. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00390
• Karbach, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014). Making working memory work: A meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults. Psychological Science, 25, 2027–2203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614548725
• Khemlani, S. S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2017). Illusions in reasoning. Minds & Machines, 27, 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9421-x
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
• Klenberg, L., Korkman, M., & Lahti-Nuuttila, P. (2001). Differential development of attention and executive functions in 3- to 12-year-old finish children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2001_6
• Klingberg, T., Fernell, E., Olesen, P. J., Johnson, M., Gustafsson, P., Dahlström, K., Gillberg, C. G., Forssberg, H., & Westerberg, H. (2005). Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010
• Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002
• Lezak, M. D. (1982). The problem of assessing executive functions. International Journal of Psychology, 17, 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598208247445
• Luria, A. R. (1966). Human brain and psychological processes. Harper & Row.
• Markovits, H. (2000). A mental model analysis of young children’s conditional reasoning with meaningful premises. Thinking & Reasoning, 6(4), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467800750038166
• Markovits, H., & Barouillet, P. (2002). The development of conditional reasoning: A mental model account. Developmental Review, 22, 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0533
• Markovits, H., Thompson, V. A., & Brisson, J. (2014). Metacognition and abstract reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 42, 681–693. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0488-9
• Melby-Lervâg, M., & Hulme, C. I. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228
• Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”: Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 512–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635612
• Meltzer, L., Pollica, L. S., & Barzillai, M. (2007). Executive function in the classroom: Embedding strategy instruction into daily teaching practices. In Meltzer, L. (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice (pp. 165–193). Guilford Press.
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wagner, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
• Moreau, D., & Conway, A. R. A. (2014). The case for an ecological approach to cognitive training. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 334–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.009
• Moshman, D. (1990). The development of metalogical understanding. In Overton, W. F. (Ed.), Reasoning, necessity and logic: Developmental perspectives (pp. 205–225). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Moshman, D. (2011). Adolescent rationality and development: Cognition, morality, and identity (3rd Ed.). Psychology Press.
• Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press.
• Nisbett, R. E., Fong, G. T., Lehman, D. R., & Cheng, P. W. (1987). Teaching reasoning. Science, 238, 625–631. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.3672116
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2003). Conditional probability and the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Mind and Language, 18, 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00232
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2020). New paradigms in the psychology of reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 305–330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051132
• Oberauer, K., & Wilhelm, O. (2003). The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models, and personal utilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 680–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.680
• Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001
• Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it? Princeton University Press. http://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828678
• Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning in human reasoning. Choice Reviews Online, 32(02), 32–1231. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-1231
• Rojas-Barahona, C. A., Moreno-Ríos, S., & García-Madruga, J. A. (2010). Desarrollo del razonamiento deductivo: Diferencias entre condicionales fácticos y contrafácticos [Development of deductive reasoning: Differences between factual and counterfactual conditionals]. Psicológica, 31(1), 1–24.
• Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2017). Working memory training in typically developing children: A meta-analysis of the available evidence. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000265
• Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2020). Working memory training in typically developing children: A multilevel meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 423–434. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01681-y
• Sánchez-Pérez, N., Castillo, A., López-López, J. A., Pina, V., Puga, J. L., Campoy, G., González-Salinas, C., & Fuentes, L. J. (2018). Computer-based training in math and working memory improves cognitive skills and academic achievement in primary school children: Behavioral results. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02327
• Santamaría, C., Tse, P. P., Moreno-Ríos, S., & García-Madruga, J. A. (2013). Deductive reasoning and metalogical knowledge in preadolescence: A mental model appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.743988
• Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453. http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
• Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
• Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
• Soveri, A., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Salo, B., & Laine, M. (2017). Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 24, 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1217-0
• Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011). The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models. Developmental Review, 31(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.003
• Strobach, T., & Karbach, J. (2016). Cognitive training. An overview of features and applications. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42662-4
• Swanson, H. L. (2015). Cognitive strategy interventions improve word problem solving and working memory in children with math disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1099. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01099
• Thompson, V. A. (2012). Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In Evans, J. St. B. T. & Frankish, K. (Ed.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171–195). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0008 (Original work published 2009).
• Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
• Titz, C., & Karbach, J. (2014). Working memory and executive functions: Effects of training on academic achievement. Psychological Research, 78(6), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0537-1
• Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–295X.114.1.104
• Velasco, J., & García-Madruga, J. A. (1997). La búsqueda de contraejemplos como estrategia metalógica: Un estudio sobre la influencia de su entrenamiento en el razonamiento silogístico [Searching for counterexamples as metalogical strategy: A study on the influence of training on syllogistic reasoning]. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 80, 17–35. http://doi.org/10.1174/021037097761396144
• Verschueren, N., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005). A dual-process specification of causal reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 239–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780442000178
• von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Effects and mechanisms of working memory training: A review. Psychological Research, 78, 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0524-6
• Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Reznick, J. S., & Frye, D. (1997). Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 198–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.198
• Zelazo, P. D., Müller, U., Frye, D., Marcovitch, S., Argitis, G., Boseovski, J., Chiang, J. K., Hongwanishkul, D., Schuster, B. V., & Sutherland, A. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(3), vii–137. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0037-976x.2003.00260.x