El debate esta servido. La transparencia en los laudos arbitralesUn tribunal de apelación o un tribunal internacional de inversiones

Bibliographische Referenzen

• Álvarez Ávila, G., «Las características del arbitraje del CIADI». Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, 2002.
• Bentolila, D., «Hacia una jurisprudencia arbitral en el arbitraje internacional de inversiones», Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, 2012.
• Berger, K.P., «International Arbitration Practice and the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts», AM. J. COMP. L., Vol. 46, 1998.
• Bhatia, V., Candlin, Ch., Sharma, R., «Confidentiality and Integrity in. International Commercial Arbitration Practice», Arbitration, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2009.
• Blavi, F., «A Case in Favour of Publicly Available Awards in International Commercial Arbitration: Transparency v Confidentiality», INT’L BUS. L. J., Vol. 1, 2016.
• Born, G., International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, Segunda Edición, The Netherlands, 2014.
• Brenowitz, S., «Deadly Secrecy: «The Erosion of public information under private justice», Ohio Student Journal on Dispute Resolu¬tion, No. 19, 2004
• Carmody, M., «Overturning the Presumption of Confidentiality: Should the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency be applied to InernacionalCommercial Arbitration?», INT’L TRADE & BUS. L. REV., Vol. 19, 2016.
• Carmody, M., «Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribu¬nals», BJIL., Vol. 24, 2006.
• Carmody, M., «Reputation and Reality in the ICSID Annulment Process: Understanding the Distinction Between Annulment and Appeal», ICSID Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 7(1), 1992.
• Cheng, T.H., «Precedent and Control in Investment Treaty Arbitr¬tion», Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2006.
• Commission, J.P., «Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Ci¬tation Analysis of a Developing Jurisprudence», JIA, Vol. 24, 2007.
• Crawford, J., «Similarity of Issues in Disputes Arising under the Same or Similarly Drafted Investment Treaties», in Gaillard, E., Banifatemi, Y.: Precedent in international arbitration, Juris Arbitration, 2008.
• Dessemontet, F., «Arbitration and confidentiality», ARIA, No. 7, 1996, p. 318.
• Dugan, CH.F., Wallace, D.Jr., Rubins, N., Sabahi, B., Investor-State Arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008.
• Fauchald, O.K., «The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals — An Empirical Analysis», European Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, 2008.
• Feldman, M., «Investment Arbitration Appellate Mechanism Options: Consistency, Accuracy, and Balance of Power», ICSID Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2017.
• Fernández Arroyo, D.P., «El auge del arbitraje frente al debate sobre su legitimidad» en Jornadas sobre The Transformation of Enforce¬ment, Instituto Universitario Europeo de Florencia, 2013.
• Franck, S.D., «Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law», MGBDLJ, Vol. 19, 2007.
• Frimpong Oppong, R., Niro, L.C., «Enforcing Judgments of International Courts in National Courts», Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 5(2), pp. 334-371.
• García-Bolívar, O.E., «La crisis del derecho internacional de inversiones extranjeras: propuestas de reforma», Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión. Año 3, No. 5, 2015.
• García Da Fonseca, R., De Luizi Correia, A., «The Limits of Confidentiality in arbitration: A Brazilian perspective», Y.B. ON INT’L ARB., Vol. 3, 2013.
• Henkel, CH., «The Work-Product Doctrine as a Means toward a Judicially Enforceable Duty of Confidentiality in International Com¬mercial Arbitration», N.C. J. OF INT’L L., Vol. 37, 2012
• Hobér, K., Selected Writings on Investment Treaty Arbitration, 1st Ed., Studentlitteratur, Lund, 2013.
• Hodges, P., «The Perils of Complete Transparency in International Arbitration — Should Parties Be Exposed to the Glare of Public¬ity?», PARIS J. OF INT’L ARB., Vol. 3, 2012.
• Ishikawa, T., «Keeping Interpretation in Investment Treaty Arbitration ‘‘on Track’’: The Role of States Parties» in Kalicki, J., Joubin-Bret, A. (Eds.): Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, 2015.
• Karton, J.D.H., «Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Lessons from International Uniform Law», Queen’s University Faculty of Law, 2015.
• Kaufmann-Kohler, G., Potestà, M., «Can the Mauritius Convention serve as a model for the reform of Investor-State arbitration in connection with the introduction of a permanent investment tribunal or an appeal mechanism?», Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement, 2016.
• Kaufmann-Kohler. G., «Annulment of ICSID Awards in Contracts and Treaty Arbitrations: Are there Differences?», in Gaillard, E., Banifatemi, Y. (Eds.): Annulment of ICSID Awards, IAI Series No.1, Juris Publishing, New York, 2004.
• Kim, D., «The Annulment Committee’s Role in Multiplying Inconsistency in ICSID Arbitration: The Need to Move Away from an Annulment-Based System», New York University Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2011.
• Leben, CH., «Quelques réflexions théoriques à propos des contrats d’Etat», in AA.VV.: Souveraineté étatique et marchés internationaux à la fin du 20ème siècle, A propos de 30 ans de recherche du CRE¬DIMI, Mélanges en l’honneur de Philippe Kahn, Paris, Litec, 2000.
• López Linaldi, L.A.: La necesidad de crear un órgano de apelación para arbitrajes inversionista-estado en CIADI, Revista de Derecho Económico Internacional, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2012.
• López Rodríguez, A.M., «El Sistema de Tribunales de Inversión. Posibles incompatibilidades con el Derecho europeo», Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, No. 57, 2017.
• Lowe R., «Investment arbitration claims could be traded like derivatives», IBA Global Insigh, 2013.
• Lozada Pimiento, N.E., «El mecanismo de anulación de los laudos arbitrales del ciadi: qué es y para dónde va», Revista de Derecho Privado, No. 55, enero-junio, 2016.
• Malmsten, J., «Informal Reliance on Previously Rendered Awards. An Efficient Means to Promote Consistency on the MFN Question?», UPPSALA Universitet, 2013.
• Mourre, A., «The Case for the Publication of Arbitral Awards», in Malatesta, A., Sali, R. (Ed.): The Rise of Transparence in International Arbitration: The Case for the Anonymous Publication of Arbitral Awards, JurisNet. LLC, United States of America, 2013
• Mourre, A., «Precedent and Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbi¬tration: The Case for the Publication of Arbitral Awards», in Gaillard, E., Banifatemi, Y.: Precedent in international arbitration, Juris Arbitration, 2008.
• Oglindă, B., «The Principle of Confidentiality in Arbitration: Application and Limitations of the Principle», PERSPS. OF BUS. L, J., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2015.
• Pascual Vives, F.J., «La institución del amicus curiae y el arbitraje de inversiones», Anuario español de derecho internacional, Vol. 27, 2011.
• Polanco Lazo, R., «Transparencia y Derechos de terceros en arbitrajes internacionales sobre inversión extranjera», Revista de Derecho Económico, Año XLII, No. 75, 2010.
• Posner, E.A., Yoo, J.C., «Judicial Independence in International Tribunals», California Law. Rev. Vol. 93, No. 1, 2005.
• Reuben, R.C., «Constitutional Gravity: A Unitary Theory of Alternative Dispute Resolution and Public Civil Justice», UCLA L. REV., Vol. 47, 2000.
• Roberts, A., «Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States», AJIL, Vol. 104, 2010.
• Rodríguez Vicente, M., «¿Es necesario un tribunal multilateral de inversiones?», Boletín Económico de ICE, 2017.
• Schreuer, C., «Diversity and Harmonization of Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration», Transnational Dispute Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2006.
• Schreuer, C., The ICISD Convention: A Commentary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Second Ed., 2009.
• Ten Cate, I.M., «The costs of consistency: precedent in investment treaty arbitration», CJTL, Vol. 51, 2013.
• Torterola, I., «Transparencia y publicidad en el arbitraje de inversión», Revista Ecuatoriana de Arbitraje, 2015.
• Walsh, T.W., «Substantive Review of ICSID Awards: Is the Desire for Accuracy Sufficient to Compromise Finality», BJIL., Vol. 24, No. 2, 2006.
• Weidemaier, W.M.C., «Towards a Theory of Precedent in Arbitration», William and Mary Law. Review, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2010.